wenchbarwer wrote:I think the moral of the story is don't support Adelaide
Yep, that’s definitely part of the problem
wenchbarwer wrote:I think the moral of the story is don't support Adelaide
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
wenchbarwer wrote:I think the moral of the story is don't support Adelaide
dedja wrote:Pseudo wrote:dedja wrote:Faark me, she lost $459 … it didn’t even twig that this was way above the $70 odd the ticket should have cost.![]()
![]()
![]()
Might have to revert her to operating on a fully cash basis from now on.![]()
I gots to know ... how did she fall for this?
It’s a great question, and I have hinted in previous posts, not the first time she has ‘interacted’ with scammers.
I have spent countless hours over the years ‘educating’ her and providing awareness of online risks, but she for some reason still falls for stuff. The worst bit is that she gets really confused and can’t explain what she’s done, which makes it nigh impossible to help her.
She rang me after it happened, wondering if something was wrong, so she has some awareness, but it’s like Adrenalin kicks in and overrides any rational thought while it’s happening.
Will discuss with the missus on what we should do from here. My strong inclination is to suggest that we ‘ban’ her from online trading, but that’s easier said than done.
Dutchy wrote:My wife works at ANZ and for all online shopping she uses a debit card that is solely for that purpose, just moves funds over when she uses it.

Jimmy_041 wrote:Always use a credit card- best protection you have
The responsibility is on them for scams or shoddy products
All you have to do is dispute a charge within 90 days
dedja wrote:As a follow up, apparently police want to question the person in question and have publicly called for him to hand himself in.
What he did was absolutely abhorrent, but I’d be surprised if he broke any Laws. Freedom of speech is one of the things that defines our identity as a country, so I’m not sure what the charge would be if that is what police are aiming for.
MW wrote:Wouldn't be a bad thing to at least identify him and put him on some sort of watch list
Trader wrote:dedja wrote:As a follow up, apparently police want to question the person in question and have publicly called for him to hand himself in.
What he did was absolutely abhorrent, but I’d be surprised if he broke any Laws. Freedom of speech is one of the things that defines our identity as a country, so I’m not sure what the charge would be if that is what police are aiming for.
Agree on both fronts.
The guy clearly did it to antagonise, but it's not illegal.
The initial response from the police to want to go after this guy, who has shown support for the man that killed one of their colleagues, is somewhat understandable, but equally, the police need to remain impartial and professional.
Just cause he's annoyed you, doesn't mean you get to go after this clown.
If anything, the overreach by the police to go after this dipsh!t will only fuel the sovereign citizens even more.
MW wrote:What is a sovereign citizen? From what I can gather, it is someone who believes their birth rite is to have access and ability to own or occupy every natural resource on the land?
The sovereign citizen movement is a loose group of anti-government activists, conspiracy theorists, vexatious litigants, tax protesters and financial scammers found mainly in English-speaking common law countries—the United States, Canada, Australia, the United Kingdom, and New Zealand.
Sovereign citizens have a pseudo-legal belief system based on misinterpretations of common law, and claim not to be subject to any government statutes unless they consent to them.
MW wrote:What is a sovereign citizen? From what I can gather, it is someone who believes their birth rite is to have access and ability to own or occupy every natural resource on the land?
Jimmy_041 wrote:Trader wrote:dedja wrote:As a follow up, apparently police want to question the person in question and have publicly called for him to hand himself in.
What he did was absolutely abhorrent, but I’d be surprised if he broke any Laws. Freedom of speech is one of the things that defines our identity as a country, so I’m not sure what the charge would be if that is what police are aiming for.
Agree on both fronts.
The guy clearly did it to antagonise, but it's not illegal.
The initial response from the police to want to go after this guy, who has shown support for the man that killed one of their colleagues, is somewhat understandable, but equally, the police need to remain impartial and professional.
Just cause he's annoyed you, doesn't mean you get to go after this clown.
If anything, the overreach by the police to go after this dipsh!t will only fuel the sovereign citizens even more.
If the Victorian Police get ahold of him he will have died with 3 self inflicted shots to the back of the head
A man photographed and filmed holding up an “offensive” and “disgraceful” Dezi Freeman poster at a March for Australia rally in Adelaide has been arrested.
South Australian Police announced the arrest on Tuesday, saying a 39-year-old Golden Grove man had attended the Grenfell Street police station in the CBD.
“After being interviewed, he was charged with displaying offensive material in a public place,” the police said.
The poster reads “free man” beneath an image of alleged cop killer Dezi Freeman.
“After being interviewed, he was charged with displaying offensive material in a public place,” the police said.
dedja wrote:
Has now been arrested.A man photographed and filmed holding up an “offensive” and “disgraceful” Dezi Freeman poster at a March for Australia rally in Adelaide has been arrested.
South Australian Police announced the arrest on Tuesday, saying a 39-year-old Golden Grove man had attended the Grenfell Street police station in the CBD.
“After being interviewed, he was charged with displaying offensive material in a public place,” the police said.
The poster reads “free man” beneath an image of alleged cop killer Dezi Freeman.
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot] and 121 guests