Tasmania Devils

Talk on the national game
Post Reply
User avatar
Booney
Coach
Posts: 64099
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:17 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Location: Alberton proud
Has thanked: 8790 times
Been thanked: 12735 times
Contact:

Re: Tasmania Devils

Post by Booney »

All but confirmed, the Greens have publicly stated they'll support the Labor no confidence motion making the stadium a Tasmanian Tiger.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
User avatar
Lightning McQueen
Coach
Posts: 55273
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 10:13 am
Location: Radiator Springs
Has thanked: 4971 times
Been thanked: 9061 times
Contact:

Re: Tasmania Devils

Post by Lightning McQueen »

Booney wrote:All but confirmed, the Greens have publicly stated they'll support the Labor no confidence motion making the stadium a Tasmanian Tiger.


So they'll be based at Inceston?
HOGG SHIELD DIVISION V WINNER 2018.
User avatar
RB
Coach
Posts: 6639
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 3:15 pm
Has thanked: 931 times
Been thanked: 1392 times
Contact:

Re: Tasmania Devils

Post by RB »

In the eyes of this mainlander, it would be a good outcome if Tasmania get a team without having to spend a gazillion dollars on a 26k-capacity stadium in Hobart, when there's a 19k-capacity stadium a couple of miles away.

I'd also like the AFL to understand that it's not their place to issue ridiculous ultimatums to state governments.
R.I.P. the SANFL 1877 - 2013
User avatar
Booney
Coach
Posts: 64099
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:17 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Location: Alberton proud
Has thanked: 8790 times
Been thanked: 12735 times
Contact:

Re: Tasmania Devils

Post by Booney »

RB wrote:In the eyes of this mainlander, it would be a good outcome if Tasmania get a team without having to spend a gazillion dollars on a 26k-capacity stadium in Hobart, when there's a 19k-capacity stadium a couple of miles away.

I'd also like the AFL to understand that it's not their place to issue ridiculous ultimatums to state governments.


I'm not sure it's an ultimatum, the terms of entry were negotiated by both parties and the conditions stipulated a roofed stadium.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
User avatar
Lightning McQueen
Coach
Posts: 55273
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 10:13 am
Location: Radiator Springs
Has thanked: 4971 times
Been thanked: 9061 times
Contact:

Re: Tasmania Devils

Post by Lightning McQueen »

RB wrote:In the eyes of this mainlander, it would be a good outcome if Tasmania get a team without having to spend a gazillion dollars on a 26k-capacity stadium in Hobart, when there's a 19k-capacity stadium a couple of miles away.

I'd also like the AFL to understand that it's not their place to issue ridiculous ultimatums to state governments.


They wouldn't fill the 19K stadium.

I'd prefer it if they waited and introduced two teams at the same time to keep the one team bye out of our game.
HOGG SHIELD DIVISION V WINNER 2018.
wenchbarwer
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4319
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2021 1:00 pm
Team: West Adelaide
Team: Essendon
Has thanked: 2021 times
Been thanked: 977 times
Contact:

Re: Tasmania Devils

Post by wenchbarwer »

RB wrote:In the eyes of this mainlander, it would be a good outcome if Tasmania get a team without having to spend a gazillion dollars on a 26k-capacity stadium in Hobart, when there's a 19k-capacity stadium a couple of miles away.

I'd also like the AFL to understand that it's not their place to issue ridiculous ultimatums to state governments.


To channel one of the better AFL ad campaigns:

AFL House staying in their own lane? I'd like to see that!!
my yes be yes, my no be no
User avatar
Lightning McQueen
Coach
Posts: 55273
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 10:13 am
Location: Radiator Springs
Has thanked: 4971 times
Been thanked: 9061 times
Contact:

Re: Tasmania Devils

Post by Lightning McQueen »

Booney wrote:
RB wrote:In the eyes of this mainlander, it would be a good outcome if Tasmania get a team without having to spend a gazillion dollars on a 26k-capacity stadium in Hobart, when there's a 19k-capacity stadium a couple of miles away.

I'd also like the AFL to understand that it's not their place to issue ridiculous ultimatums to state governments.


I'm not sure it's an ultimatum, the terms of entry were negotiated by both parties and the conditions stipulated a roofed stadium.


Should've involved the BBL committee too.
HOGG SHIELD DIVISION V WINNER 2018.
Jim05
Coach
Posts: 49466
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 8:33 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Essendon
Team: South Gawler
Has thanked: 1137 times
Been thanked: 4041 times
Contact:

Re: Tasmania Devils

Post by Jim05 »

RB wrote:In the eyes of this mainlander, it would be a good outcome if Tasmania get a team without having to spend a gazillion dollars on a 26k-capacity stadium in Hobart, when there's a 19k-capacity stadium a couple of miles away.

I'd also like the AFL to understand that it's not their place to issue ridiculous ultimatums to state governments.
The AFL can make all the ultimatums it wants but the government also didn’t have to fold like a deck of cards.
I’ve maintained tight from the start that the AFL didn’t want Tassie in the comp. They made these silly ultimatums thinking it would fall over and reckon they were blindsided by how easy the Tassie government caved in
User avatar
stan
Coach
Posts: 15668
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:23 am
Team: Norwood
Team: West Coast Eagles
Team: Goodwood Saints
Location: North Eastern Suburbs
Has thanked: 88 times
Been thanked: 1332 times
Contact:

Re: Tasmania Devils

Post by stan »

daysofourlives wrote:
whufc wrote:
MW wrote:Would be down to 50/50 that this team actually gets in the league in the end. Can't see a state govt commit to $1bn (with federal help no doubt) to a sports stadium. Would need a shift by the AFL to accept no roof.


I can't see the AFL rejecting the team. Whilst they will throw the blame on the Tassie government the AFL don't come out looking great in this either.

Then throw in the fact every year they don't have a 20th team they are losing money through the TV rights that an extra game would cause. So they need to get to 20 teams as soon as possible and the first step is getting a competitive 19th team.

Most likely outcome will be a tassie team to enter playing at both Hobart and Launceston with the AFL agreeing to some form of extension on a time frame for a new stadium.


Ive said from the start the AFL have no intention of having a team from Tassie, they know the conditions they have set will not be met. A 19th team creates massive issues and no benefits, a 20th team is a pipe dream imo.
At the end of the day a Tassie team will only strip money from their bottom line. It doesnt create any extra games it in fact takes away games that are big money spinners, at least one per week. Even if you look at from not so big matches, like instead of say Essendon playing Bulldogs a 2nd time they now play Tassie, 50k at marvel vs 18k if theyre lucky. It will hit the executives KPI's badly and their bonuses. Its a massive risk to go to 19 without a clear plan for 20. Their bonuses could be hit for 10 years, no one is signing up for that.
The AFL will not budge on the roof
Could this be why the AFL is holding off on making key appointments and or sackings. Waiting for Benny Gale to become available in 6 weeks time
I reckon your on the money here. The AFL know the stadium won't happen and it the put they want.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
User avatar
dedja
Coach
Posts: 26497
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 10:40 pm
Team: Glenelg
Has thanked: 1105 times
Been thanked: 2072 times
Contact:

Re: Tasmania Devils

Post by dedja »

RB wrote:In the eyes of this mainlander, it would be a good outcome if Tasmania get a team without having to spend a gazillion dollars on a 26k-capacity stadium in Hobart, when there's a 19k-capacity stadium a couple of miles away.

I'd also like the AFL to understand that it's not their place to issue ridiculous ultimatums to state governments.


Why stop now? They’ve been doing it for years.
Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
Brodlach
Coach
Posts: 51603
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 1:48 pm
Team: West Adelaide
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Colonel Light Gardens
Location: Unley
Has thanked: 72 times
Been thanked: 5256 times
Contact:

Re: Tasmania Devils

Post by Brodlach »

RB wrote:In the eyes of this mainlander, it would be a good outcome if Tasmania get a team without having to spend a gazillion dollars on a 26k-capacity stadium in Hobart, when there's a 19k-capacity stadium a couple of miles away.

I'd also like the AFL to understand that it's not their place to issue ridiculous ultimatums to state governments.

They are currently spending $100 million on the current stadium now too
July 11th 2012....
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods



2024 Melbourne Cup Punting Challenge winner knocking off the Pirate King!
mighty_tiger_79
Coach
Posts: 62502
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:59 pm
Team: Geelong
Location: at the TAB
Has thanked: 14201 times
Been thanked: 5170 times
Contact:

Re: Tasmania Devils

Post by mighty_tiger_79 »

Brodlach wrote:
RB wrote:In the eyes of this mainlander, it would be a good outcome if Tasmania get a team without having to spend a gazillion dollars on a 26k-capacity stadium in Hobart, when there's a 19k-capacity stadium a couple of miles away.

I'd also like the AFL to understand that it's not their place to issue ridiculous ultimatums to state governments.

They are currently spending $100 million on the current stadium now too

Drop in the ocean when considering total investment required
Matty Wade is a star and deserves more respect from the forum family!
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
Posts: 47486
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:54 am
Team: Glenelg
Team: North Melbourne
Location: Location, Location
Has thanked: 2937 times
Been thanked: 4844 times
Contact:

Re: Tasmania Devils

Post by Dutchy »

Can anyone explain to me why a roof on the new stadium was a non negotiable?
User avatar
dedja
Coach
Posts: 26497
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 10:40 pm
Team: Glenelg
Has thanked: 1105 times
Been thanked: 2072 times
Contact:

Re: Tasmania Devils

Post by dedja »

It’s been a clusterfaark from the day it was conceived, but with Eric Abetz’s involvement, this almost guarantees failure.

If I’m not mistaken, the AFL contribution is a paltry $15M.

A successful no-confidence motion in the Premier will result in an election.

#shambles
Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
User avatar
RB
Coach
Posts: 6639
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 3:15 pm
Has thanked: 931 times
Been thanked: 1392 times
Contact:

Re: Tasmania Devils

Post by RB »

Booney wrote:
RB wrote:In the eyes of this mainlander, it would be a good outcome if Tasmania get a team without having to spend a gazillion dollars on a 26k-capacity stadium in Hobart, when there's a 19k-capacity stadium a couple of miles away.

I'd also like the AFL to understand that it's not their place to issue ridiculous ultimatums to state governments.


I'm not sure it's an ultimatum, the terms of entry were negotiated by both parties and the conditions stipulated a roofed stadium.


You're correct - ultimatum was the wrong word.

Imposing overly-strenuous conditions is perhaps a better way of phrasing it, noting that as someone pointed out, the government folding like a deck of cards doesn't help.

The AFL have received enough public money as it is.
R.I.P. the SANFL 1877 - 2013
User avatar
dedja
Coach
Posts: 26497
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 10:40 pm
Team: Glenelg
Has thanked: 1105 times
Been thanked: 2072 times
Contact:

Re: Tasmania Devils

Post by dedja »

Not to mention the AFL’s not for profit status …
Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
User avatar
RB
Coach
Posts: 6639
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 3:15 pm
Has thanked: 931 times
Been thanked: 1392 times
Contact:

Re: Tasmania Devils

Post by RB »

mighty_tiger_79 wrote:
Brodlach wrote:
RB wrote:In the eyes of this mainlander, it would be a good outcome if Tasmania get a team without having to spend a gazillion dollars on a 26k-capacity stadium in Hobart, when there's a 19k-capacity stadium a couple of miles away.

I'd also like the AFL to understand that it's not their place to issue ridiculous ultimatums to state governments.

They are currently spending $100 million on the current stadium now too

Drop in the ocean when considering total investment required
How much investment do you think is required?
R.I.P. the SANFL 1877 - 2013
Brodlach
Coach
Posts: 51603
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 1:48 pm
Team: West Adelaide
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Colonel Light Gardens
Location: Unley
Has thanked: 72 times
Been thanked: 5256 times
Contact:

Re: Tasmania Devils

Post by Brodlach »

RB wrote:
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:
Brodlach wrote:
RB wrote:In the eyes of this mainlander, it would be a good outcome if Tasmania get a team without having to spend a gazillion dollars on a 26k-capacity stadium in Hobart, when there's a 19k-capacity stadium a couple of miles away.

I'd also like the AFL to understand that it's not their place to issue ridiculous ultimatums to state governments.

They are currently spending $100 million on the current stadium now too

Drop in the ocean when considering total investment required
How much investment do you think is required?

My point was why spend the $100 million if they are not going to play there much longer
July 11th 2012....
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods



2024 Melbourne Cup Punting Challenge winner knocking off the Pirate King!
User avatar
mots02
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4341
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 4:12 pm
Team: Sturt
Team: Gold Coast Suns
Team: Reynella
Has thanked: 205 times
Been thanked: 1341 times
Contact:

Re: Tasmania Devils

Post by mots02 »

Dutchy wrote:Can anyone explain to me why a roof on the new stadium was a non negotiable?


Particularly when the roof rules out international cricket being played there.

A nice stadium, completely surrounded by grandstands keeps the bulk of the weather out… particularly with the roof over hangs these days.

They have bloody open air stadiums in Europe and North America playing in the snow.

Dumb ultimatum to have the roof.
User avatar
Lightning McQueen
Coach
Posts: 55273
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 10:13 am
Location: Radiator Springs
Has thanked: 4971 times
Been thanked: 9061 times
Contact:

Re: Tasmania Devils

Post by Lightning McQueen »

Dutchy wrote:Can anyone explain to me why a roof on the new stadium was a non negotiable?


The neighbours tree drops a lot of leaves.
HOGG SHIELD DIVISION V WINNER 2018.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 205 guests