SANFL 2025

All discussions to do with the SANFL
Post Reply
Dogs64
Under 18s
Posts: 612
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2018 9:11 am
Team: Central District
Has thanked: 435 times
Been thanked: 266 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL 2025

Post by Dogs64 »

Maybe Bell, Watkins or Liddy to come?
User avatar
goddy11
League Bench Warmer
Posts: 1369
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2014 4:35 pm
Team: Eagles
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Myponga-Sellicks
Has thanked: 678 times
Been thanked: 221 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL 2025

Post by goddy11 »

Poor South losing a player.
Dogs64
Under 18s
Posts: 612
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2018 9:11 am
Team: Central District
Has thanked: 435 times
Been thanked: 266 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL 2025

Post by Dogs64 »

Noah Howes from South to Collingwood (random).Port the pricks take Liddy.
whufc
Coach
Posts: 29217
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 9:56 am
Team: Central District
Team: BSR
Location: Blakeview
Has thanked: 6065 times
Been thanked: 2933 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL 2025

Post by whufc »

Liddy to port done!!!
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
Dogs64
Under 18s
Posts: 612
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2018 9:11 am
Team: Central District
Has thanked: 435 times
Been thanked: 266 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL 2025

Post by Dogs64 »

No Watkins or Jezza, not a good advertisement for Port's development of "magpies" players.
User avatar
goddy11
League Bench Warmer
Posts: 1369
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2014 4:35 pm
Team: Eagles
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Myponga-Sellicks
Has thanked: 678 times
Been thanked: 221 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL 2025

Post by goddy11 »

Dogs64 wrote:No Watkins or Jezza, not a good advertisement for Port's development of "magpies" players.
I thought Watkins might be the best of the SA players. Obviously, the clubs didn't rate him, including Port.
Dogs64
Under 18s
Posts: 612
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2018 9:11 am
Team: Central District
Has thanked: 435 times
Been thanked: 266 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL 2025

Post by Dogs64 »

goddy11 wrote:
Dogs64 wrote:No Watkins or Jezza, not a good advertisement for Port's development of "magpies" players.
I thought Watkins might be the best of the SA players. Obviously, the clubs didn't rate him, including Port.
Central should try to recruit Watkins, obviously Port don't rate him. Though with the extra $70k the sanfl gifted port/crows it makes it hard.
northerner
League Bench Warmer
Posts: 1294
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2017 3:48 pm
Team: Central District
Team: Eastern Park
Has thanked: 295 times
Been thanked: 573 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL 2025

Post by northerner »

Dogs and Bays the two of the Top 5 hit hard. Dogs lose one this years very best mids whilst Bays lose two tall defenders.

Eagles and Sturt the winners tonight.

This whole process doesn't make it easy to enjoy being a fan of an SANFL Club.
whufc
Coach
Posts: 29217
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 9:56 am
Team: Central District
Team: BSR
Location: Blakeview
Has thanked: 6065 times
Been thanked: 2933 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL 2025

Post by whufc »

northerner wrote:Dogs and Bays the two of the Top 5 hit hard. Dogs lose one this years very best mids whilst Bays lose two tall defenders.

Eagles and Sturt the winners tonight.

This whole process doesn't make it easy to enjoy being a fan of an SANFL Club.
Agree but sadly you just have to watch the players reaction to Mani being drafted to see where the SANFL sits

It’s what the players want
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
Dogs64
Under 18s
Posts: 612
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2018 9:11 am
Team: Central District
Has thanked: 435 times
Been thanked: 266 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL 2025

Post by Dogs64 »

whufc wrote:
northerner wrote:Dogs and Bays the two of the Top 5 hit hard. Dogs lose one this years very best mids whilst Bays lose two tall defenders.

Eagles and Sturt the winners tonight.

This whole process doesn't make it easy to enjoy being a fan of an SANFL Club.
Agree but sadly you just have to watch the players reaction to Mani being drafted to see where the SANFL sits

It’s what the players want
I think all are happy for the player. But a mid season draft is complete BS. The players should get a minimum 18 month contract. It also would have been more tolerable in the pre reserves teams environment. At least then they'd still potentially be playing for you (if drafted by port or crows), and at a minimum not for a team you're competing against.
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
Posts: 20533
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:04 pm
Team: Glenelg
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Has thanked: 192 times
Been thanked: 2324 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL 2025

Post by am Bays »

Ahh well, any delisted player this year or AFL hopeful come okay for us we’re happy for you to progress up or back to the next level.

Some will go, some will stay. Ossie was huge in last years GF.
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
User avatar
Hazydog
League Bench Warmer
Posts: 1343
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2005 10:02 pm
Team: Central District
Location: Paralowie
Has thanked: 190 times
Been thanked: 267 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL 2025

Post by Hazydog »

whufc wrote:
northerner wrote:Dogs and Bays the two of the Top 5 hit hard. Dogs lose one this years very best mids whilst Bays lose two tall defenders.

Eagles and Sturt the winners tonight.

This whole process doesn't make it easy to enjoy being a fan of an SANFL Club.
Agree but sadly you just have to watch the players reaction to Mani being drafted to see where the SANFL sits

It’s what the players want
Which is fine, it’s natural they should aspire to play at the top level and get what, maybe an instant 1000% pay rise?

But by the same token, the members contribute a significant amount of a clubs revenue, and if the product they are providing continually gets watered down and compromised at what point does that membership lose its lustre and value. What then?
Players win touches, Teams win matches, Clubs win Premierships.
bertiebeatle1
Under 16s
Posts: 414
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2022 10:58 am
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Has thanked: 22 times
Been thanked: 58 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL 2025

Post by bertiebeatle1 »

Dogs64 wrote:
whufc wrote:
northerner wrote:Dogs and Bays the two of the Top 5 hit hard. Dogs lose one this years very best mids whilst Bays lose two tall defenders.

Eagles and Sturt the winners tonight.

This whole process doesn't make it easy to enjoy being a fan of an SANFL Club.
Agree but sadly you just have to watch the players reaction to Mani being drafted to see where the SANFL sits

It’s what the players want
I think all are happy for the player. But a mid season draft is complete BS. The players should get a minimum 18 month contract. It also would have been more tolerable in the pre reserves teams environment. At least then they'd still potentially be playing for you (if drafted by port or crows), and at a minimum not for a team you're competing against.
Players can choose to have a minimum 18 month contract as part of their drafting conditions
User avatar
Hazydog
League Bench Warmer
Posts: 1343
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2005 10:02 pm
Team: Central District
Location: Paralowie
Has thanked: 190 times
Been thanked: 267 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL 2025

Post by Hazydog »

And potentially reduce their attraction/convenience to some of the AFL clubs. I’ll assume that info won’t be made public or reported on.
Players win touches, Teams win matches, Clubs win Premierships.
bertiebeatle1
Under 16s
Posts: 414
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2022 10:58 am
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Has thanked: 22 times
Been thanked: 58 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL 2025

Post by bertiebeatle1 »

Hazydog wrote:And potentially reduce their attraction/convenience to some of the AFL clubs. I’ll assume that info won’t be made public or reported on.
What info? There is a list of who nominated and the length of contract they nominated
User avatar
Hazydog
League Bench Warmer
Posts: 1343
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2005 10:02 pm
Team: Central District
Location: Paralowie
Has thanked: 190 times
Been thanked: 267 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL 2025

Post by Hazydog »

Ok - fair enough.. didn’t realise that
Players win touches, Teams win matches, Clubs win Premierships.
TDJ44
Under 16s
Posts: 488
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2018 8:03 am
Team: Central District
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Noarlunga
Has thanked: 250 times
Been thanked: 52 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL 2025

Post by TDJ44 »

northerner wrote:Dogs and Bays the two of the Top 5 hit hard. Dogs lose one this years very best mids whilst Bays lose two tall defenders.

Eagles and Sturt the winners tonight.

This whole process doesn't make it easy to enjoy being a fan of an SANFL Club.
Yes...it makes you wonder why we bother to go each week.
Last edited by TDJ44 on Wed May 28, 2025 10:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
Posts: 47486
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Team: Glenelg
Team: North Melbourne
Location: Location, Location
Has thanked: 2936 times
Been thanked: 4838 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL 2025

Post by Dutchy »

Have to be a record haul from the SANFL since the MSD came in?

It was brought in to fix immediate needs of AFL lists, now its just an opportunity to grab talent prior to the next draft.

SSP period was less than 100 days ago, none of these players were considered good enough for AFL lists then but are now?
TDJ44
Under 16s
Posts: 488
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2018 8:03 am
Team: Central District
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Noarlunga
Has thanked: 250 times
Been thanked: 52 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL 2025

Post by TDJ44 »

Dogs64 wrote:
goddy11 wrote:
Dogs64 wrote:No Watkins or Jezza, not a good advertisement for Port's development of "magpies" players.
I thought Watkins might be the best of the SA players. Obviously, the clubs didn't rate him, including Port.
Central should try to recruit Watkins, obviously Port don't rate him. Though with the extra $70k the sanfl gifted port/crows it makes it hard.
He would be handy but as you mentioned, we wouldn't have the same cash to offer.
Any chance we could recruit someone else.
Jim05
Coach
Posts: 49466
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 8:03 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Essendon
Team: South Gawler
Has thanked: 1136 times
Been thanked: 4041 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL 2025

Post by Jim05 »

Dutchy wrote:
It was brought in to fix immediate needs of AFL lists, now its just an opportunity to grab talent prior to the next draft.
Correct.
Very disappointing. Essendon for example has no defenders due to injuries and they don’t even take one in the MSD instead preferring to bolster other areas as it’s basically a free hit where they can play them in the VFL and get a look at them for next year
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: goddy11 and 290 guests