AFL Round 11

dedja · Post by **dedja** » Mon May 26, 2025 10:22 am

448 - Peter Carey

MW · Post by MW » Mon May 26, 2025 11:57 am

Just saw the Liam Baker incident. That’s gotta be weeks, what a dog act.

wenchbarwer · Post by **wenchbarwer** » Mon May 26, 2025 12:40 pm

MW wrote:Just saw the Liam Baker incident. That’s gotta be weeks, what a dog act.

It's weak as piss, not sure he'll get games though.

If I was Peatling I'd be looking for a square up next time they play, Baker got utterly ragdolled in the vision, too. Shouldn't throw cheapies if you can't back it up.

Lightning McQueen · Post by **Lightning McQueen** » Mon May 26, 2025 1:29 pm

MW wrote:Just saw the Liam Baker incident. That’s gotta be weeks, what a dog act.

Love the way Izak threw him around, he's lucky it wasn't big Thilthy.

wenchbarwer · Post by **wenchbarwer** » Mon May 26, 2025 1:37 pm

Lightning McQueen wrote:
MW wrote:Just saw the Liam Baker incident. That’s gotta be weeks, what a dog act.

Love the way Izak threw him around, he's lucky it wasn't big Thilthy.

Disappointed that the big unit got involved right at the start then didn't really want a piece of it after being pushed over by Jack Graham.

stan · Post by **stan** » Mon May 26, 2025 2:26 pm

MW wrote:Just saw the Liam Baker incident. That’s gotta be weeks, what a dog act.

Ask yourself, would Cripps get weeks for this?
Then add the non cripps multiplier followed by the addition of not a good bloke, but remember if he's been on an Friendly AFL show then you subtract part of the good bloke discount.

After that, ask yourself what you think he will get.

Probably get a week I would say.

Lightning McQueen · Post by **Lightning McQueen** » Mon May 26, 2025 2:30 pm

stan wrote:
MW wrote:Just saw the Liam Baker incident. That’s gotta be weeks, what a dog act.
Ask yourself, would Cripps get weeks for this?
Then add the non cripps multiplier followed by the addition of not a good bloke, but remember if he's been on an Friendly AFL show then you subtract part of the good bloke discount.

After that, ask yourself what you think he will get.

Probably get a week I would say.

I love your breakdown on it but Cripps wouldn't do that.

am Bays · Post by **am Bays** » Mon May 26, 2025 5:18 pm

wenchbarwer wrote:
MW wrote:Just saw the Liam Baker incident. That’s gotta be weeks, what a dog act.

It's weak as piss, not sure he'll get games though.

If I was Peatling I'd be looking for a square up next time they play, Baker got utterly ragdolled in the vision, too. Shouldn't throw cheapies if you can't back it up.

It’s the sort of act that proliferates in senior colts/community footy if they think they can get away with it.

Send a message.

Used to sh!t me when fellow older school umpires used to let players get away with it. I understood that’s what they were used to but **** it could result in games getting out of hand.

Armchair expert · Post by **Armchair expert** » Mon May 26, 2025 6:18 pm

Baker only received a fine $5000

what a joke

DOC · Post by **DOC** » Tue May 27, 2025 6:39 am

woodublieve12 wrote:
Armchair expert wrote:
woodublieve12 wrote:
Armchair expert wrote:More thug acts from Swans players enjoy your long holiday Callum

Gee whiz, you are made of plastercine. Nothing in it

3 weeks just like Alex Pearce

No concussion. No suspension.

Got one.

It’s not like they give different suspensions for the same offence.

stan · Post by **stan** » Tue May 27, 2025 7:04 am

DOC wrote:
woodublieve12 wrote:
Armchair expert wrote:
woodublieve12 wrote:[quote="Armchair expert"]More thug acts from Swans players enjoy your long holiday Callum

Gee whiz, you are made of plastercine. Nothing in it

3 weeks just like Alex Pearce

No concussion. No suspension.

Got one.

It’s not like they give different suspensions for the same offence.[/quote]I clearly explained how the formula works when talking about Baker. I showed full working.

stan · Post by **stan** » Tue May 27, 2025 7:05 am

Lightning McQueen wrote:
stan wrote:
MW wrote:Just saw the Liam Baker incident. That’s gotta be weeks, what a dog act.
Ask yourself, would Cripps get weeks for this?
Then add the non cripps multiplier followed by the addition of not a good bloke, but remember if he's been on an Friendly AFL show then you subtract part of the good bloke discount.

After that, ask yourself what you think he will get.

Probably get a week I would say.

I love your breakdown on it but Cripps wouldn't do that.

Needed a base case to start with.

Armchair expert · Post by **Armchair expert** » Tue May 27, 2025 8:20 pm

Alex Pearce decision overturned and he is free to play.

:shock:

saintal · Post by **saintal** » Tue May 27, 2025 8:35 pm

Armchair expert wrote:Alex Pearce decision overturned and he is free to play.

A good outcome :shock:

mots02 · Post by **mots02** » Tue May 27, 2025 8:36 pm

Armchair expert wrote:Alex Pearce decision overturned and he is free to play.

The AFL like to keep us on our toes and themselves in the news cycle…. Mission accomplished as everyone will discuss this tomorrow on the AFL media shows

Brodlach · Post by **Brodlach** » Tue May 27, 2025 8:38 pm

As he should, just a football collision

Armchair expert · Post by **Armchair expert** » Tue May 27, 2025 8:44 pm

Sydney accepted Callum Mills ban

lets all laugh at Sydney

Jim05 · Post by **Jim05** » Tue May 27, 2025 8:47 pm

Armchair expert wrote:Alex Pearce decision overturned and he is free to play.

Rightly so

AFL Round 11

Re: AFL Round 11

Re: AFL Round 11

Re: AFL Round 11

Re: AFL Round 11

Re: AFL Round 11

Re: AFL Round 11

Re: AFL Round 11

Re: AFL Round 11

Re: AFL Round 11

Re: AFL Round 11

Re: AFL Round 11

Re: AFL Round 11

Re: AFL Round 11

Re: AFL Round 11

Re: AFL Round 11

Re: AFL Round 11

Re: AFL Round 11

Re: AFL Round 11

Who is online