mots02 wrote:amber_fluid wrote:Rankine
Mark or not?
Would have been paid to Cripps
Cripps wouldn’t have gone to ground
mots02 wrote:amber_fluid wrote:Rankine
Mark or not?
Would have been paid to Cripps
mots02 wrote:Welfare check on the ‘the right in front of me’ guy
amber_fluid wrote:mots02 wrote:amber_fluid wrote:Rankine
Mark or not?
Would have been paid to Cripps
Cripps wouldn’t have gone to ground
mots02 wrote:amber_fluid wrote:mots02 wrote:amber_fluid wrote:Rankine
Mark or not?
Would have been paid to Cripps
Cripps wouldn’t have gone to ground
Carlton wouldn’t have been close enough for it to matter
amber_fluid wrote:Rankine
Mark or not?
mal wrote:amber_fluid wrote:Rankine
Mark or not?
First goal of Last qtr
Jed Walter played on or not ?
He did was not pinged = GC goal
Then the Rankine question yes mark or free both unpaid
= No shot for goal
What does happen at times :
In a post game speech Nicksy will deny the umps cost his team
In the front bar of a pub with his mates , he will say that his team was robbed
amber_fluid wrote:Rankine
Mark or not?
DOC wrote:amber_fluid wrote:Rankine
Mark or not?
Just seen it. If not a mark it’s a free for a tackle in the marking contest.
I’ll say it again.
The AFL is easily the worst umpired professional sporting league in the world.
amber_fluid wrote:DOC wrote:amber_fluid wrote:Rankine
Mark or not?
Just seen it. If not a mark it’s a free for a tackle in the marking contest.
I’ll say it again.
The AFL is easily the worst umpired professional sporting league in the world.
Yep mark and/or free
Pseudo wrote:I saw the last quarter of the Clowns game in the Holdy while.downing a few sherbets with mates before the real game.
As a neutral observer, indeed as one who has antipathy for the Clows, I say this:
The Clowns were robbed. No argument
amber_fluid wrote:Rankine
Mark or not?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 181 guests