rogernumber10 wrote:Their final list is in.
Oh ok, i wasn't aware of that. All media reports indicate the club was still weighing up their options.
Presumably this has only happened in the last day or so.
by GWW » Wed Oct 31, 2007 1:40 pm
rogernumber10 wrote:Their final list is in.
by NFC » Wed Oct 31, 2007 1:44 pm
by rogernumber10 » Wed Oct 31, 2007 1:45 pm
by Hondo » Wed Oct 31, 2007 2:33 pm
by GWW » Wed Oct 31, 2007 3:28 pm
hondo71 wrote:According to AFL web-site, they don't yet have details of Port's delistings, if any
by Macca19 » Wed Oct 31, 2007 3:47 pm
NFC wrote:Can't believe they're keeping Giles.
by rogernumber10 » Wed Oct 31, 2007 3:55 pm
by GWW » Wed Oct 31, 2007 3:56 pm
rogernumber10 wrote:Port - Mahoney, Symes and Wakelin the three to go, as the rules require. Grose retained as a second year rookie.
Adelaide - Bode, Hinge, Hudson, Mattner, Messen, Perrie, Pfeiffer, Ricciuto and Torney all departed since end of season.
Gallman promoted from rookies, Walker promoted from scholarship and Moran and Symes arriving as trades.
Mcleod also now qualifies as a veteran outside the list.
by rogernumber10 » Wed Oct 31, 2007 4:13 pm
by sydney-dog » Wed Oct 31, 2007 9:07 pm
by GWW » Wed Oct 31, 2007 9:14 pm
by sydney-dog » Wed Oct 31, 2007 9:30 pm
by GWW » Wed Oct 31, 2007 9:40 pm
sydney-dog wrote:GWW
My apology, you are correct.......
my main point was that this is the first lodgement only, and all clubs have two more opportunities to delist players
by NFC » Wed Oct 31, 2007 11:58 pm
Macca19 wrote:NFC wrote:Can't believe they're keeping Giles.
Why? He improved a lot this year. You dont give 17 year old ruckmen two years to make it and dump them when they have improved. He'll get two more seasons, mark it down. Hes only 19. Same with Minson.
by NFC » Thu Nov 01, 2007 12:01 am
sydney-dog wrote:this is why I have said previously, for the crows, maybe Doughty and Jericho are not safe just yet
by NFC » Thu Nov 01, 2007 12:02 am
GWW wrote:Yes, no problems. I think both Adelaide clubs will further study their options a bit longer before deciding whether to cut further players from their list. I guess it allows the club to put implied pressure on players on the "fringe" to ensure their fitness and attitude dont relax during the off season, leading up to when the final list lodgement is due.
by sydney-dog » Thu Nov 01, 2007 7:10 pm
by oldfella » Thu Nov 01, 2007 9:33 pm
by NFC » Thu Nov 01, 2007 11:25 pm
sydney-dog wrote:NFC
I would ask the qquestion, in regards to player surgery, do the clubs have a duty of care to enable the provide support for the surgery regardless of whether they intend to delist a player or not.....
The injury was suffered while the player was under contract
by Brad Man » Fri Nov 02, 2007 11:16 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |