Round 17 North v Glenelg

[Rox]

Can someone tell us 2.10 were easy shots or snaps , rushed ?

[Spargo]

Can someone tell us 2.10 were easy shots or snaps , rushed ?

Most were very gettable.

[am Bays]

Second half : NA 9.0, GL 2.10.

Inside 50’s , Glenelg 59 North 41
We just burnt the ball all day, forward entry was horrific, again. Should’ve been at least 5 goals up at qtr time, came back to bite us, again.

Also includes an OOBOTF in the 3rd as well

[Rox]

Can someone tell us 2.10 were easy shots or snaps , rushed ?

Most were very gettable.

Different result maybe ?

[Spargo]

Can someone tell us 2.10 were easy shots or snaps , rushed ?

Most were very gettable.

Different result maybe ?

Nah, blew it in the first qtr. NA far more efficient.

[robranisgod]

Can someone tell us 2.10 were easy shots or snaps , rushed ?

Most were very gettable.

Different result maybe ?

I just watched the replay. There were 2 or at most 3 shots that should have been goals. McBean missed a set shot after the half time siren from about 30 metres or so virtually dead in front, Reynolds missed a set shot from about 20 metres out on a slight angle after nose diving into the Prospect dirt, in the last quarter and I think that it was Bell who ran into an open goal and tried to dribble the ball through rather than kicking a drop punt. He was about 40 metres out but there was no one between him and the goals.
Reynolds in particular and McBean missed about 5 set shots from about 50 metres out where they were off line trying to make the extra distance. Sometimes they go through but often they miss like happened on Saturday. A couple of similar shots were punched through.
North on the other hand kicked there last 10 goals without a miss. Most of these 10 goals were "gimmes". Dignan and Harvey both kicked great shots from the boundary. The other 8 were regulation goals.

[dedja]

North deserved the win, full stop.

[am Bays]

The missed shots is one thing what was worse. IMO, was that we had 31 less tackles than the week before.

Our defensive intent was just not these