tigerpie wrote:What's Hawkins going to get for looking at his phone or a phone?
Is it that big a deal?
No, players have to have their phones locked up during games and his was.
Players look at authorised devices during a game all the time.
Mr Beefy wrote:locky801 wrote:Wedgie wrote:tigerpie wrote:What's Hawkins going to get for looking at his phone or a phone?
Is it that big a deal?
No, players have to have their phones locked up during games and his was.
Players look at authorised devices during a game all the time.
evidently it was an authorised device, once again the media makin g a fuss over it
He was apparently looking at the rain radar
whufc wrote:Yep apparently was 100% to do with his farming which is why he has permission.
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
Brodlach wrote:Wasn’t his phone and was in his possession for about 4 seconds. Looked at the screen then gave it back.
No big deal IMO
Brodlach wrote:Wasn’t his phone and was in his possession for about 4 seconds. Looked at the screen then gave it back.
No big deal IMO
MW wrote:Brodlach wrote:Wasn’t his phone and was in his possession for about 4 seconds. Looked at the screen then gave it back.
No big deal IMO
Same thing cost Collingwood $20k
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
Brodlach wrote:MW wrote:Brodlach wrote:Wasn’t his phone and was in his possession for about 4 seconds. Looked at the screen then gave it back.
No big deal IMO
Same thing cost Collingwood $20k
I know of that one but not the actual facts.
Had they not come off for lightning it wouldn’t have occurred.