by sydney-dog » Sun Mar 26, 2006 5:49 pm
by Wedgie » Sun Mar 26, 2006 5:59 pm
sydney-dog wrote:Wegie
Mate, I never listen to Dumb and Dumber when I lived in Adel, now I live in Sydney I definitely do not listen to them
Back to your mathematical equation, your formula is flawed, firstly I would encourage you to look at data that is available on all club websites, and work out how many players for each club meet the qualification criteria against the current standards...
If you chose to test a high level formula or hypothesis, this needs to be supported by data, only this this data collection can you determine if the current standard creates a fair playing field, so it is not as simplistic as your simple maths
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by stan » Sun Mar 26, 2006 6:04 pm
Wedgie wrote:sydney-dog wrote:Wegie
Mate, I never listen to Dumb and Dumber when I lived in Adel, now I live in Sydney I definitely do not listen to them
Back to your mathematical equation, your formula is flawed, firstly I would encourage you to look at data that is available on all club websites, and work out how many players for each club meet the qualification criteria against the current standards...
If you chose to test a high level formula or hypothesis, this needs to be supported by data, only this this data collection can you determine if the current standard creates a fair playing field, so it is not as simplistic as your simple maths
I was explaining to you why the rule is as it is, Im not sure how its flawed. Its an explanation of why the rule is as it is.
If someone else wants to work out how many players played 100 VFL games during a similar period to the Crows and Port qualification they're welcome to.
Personally I dont have an issue with the system so I"m not going to.
If people want to prove its not fair (and I honestly dont know if it is or not but assume its pretty close to the money) they're welcome to follow it up.
My post in regard to Dumb and Dumber wasn't in regard to you mate, just a major reason why so many mindless people over here have a huge chip on their shoulder because they think the whole world is anti SA. Its quite sad.
by sydney-dog » Sun Mar 26, 2006 6:10 pm
by Wedgie » Sun Mar 26, 2006 6:15 pm
sydney-dog wrote:For closure on this particular topic and we may have to agree to disagree, at times certain strategies are introduce on what seems fair on a high level strategy without actually understanding the base data, in this case, on the information I have seen, the base data does not support the current law as being fair and equal.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Sheik Yerbouti » Mon Mar 27, 2006 6:28 am
by am Bays » Mon Mar 27, 2006 6:53 am
by Sheik Yerbouti » Mon Mar 27, 2006 8:08 am
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:Wouldn't ANJ son qualify ander the 100 game rule for Adelaide, I thought he got 100 games in for Adelaide, please correct me if I'm wrong....
by am Bays » Mon Mar 27, 2006 8:23 am
Sheik Yerbouti wrote:Sorry Tassie, I would'nt know.
Just to make your week starter though, there's a couple of Kernahans running around in the 13's, & they live in Manningham, smack in the guts of Roosterland.
by Sheik Yerbouti » Mon Mar 27, 2006 8:40 am
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:Sheik Yerbouti wrote:Sorry Tassie, I would'nt know.
Just to make your week starter though, there's a couple of Kernahans running around in the 13's, & they live in Manningham, smack in the guts of Roosterland.
muttermuttercursecurse
maybe a family cousin will pay the $3000 transfer fee a la Nic Fosdike when he played in the Glenelg U/15s....
by Leaping Lindner » Mon Mar 27, 2006 9:27 am
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:Wouldn't ANJ son qualify ander the 100 game rule for Adelaide, I thought he got 100 games in for Adelaide, please correct me if I'm wrong....
by JK » Mon Mar 27, 2006 9:56 am
by GWW » Mon Mar 27, 2006 6:37 pm
by Dissident » Fri Mar 31, 2006 4:15 pm
Wedgie wrote:The Crows trying to change the rules so games count after they were formed for another club is absolutely ridiculous
by doggies4eva » Fri Mar 31, 2006 5:18 pm
by Punk Rooster » Fri Mar 31, 2006 7:27 pm
Quiet you...doggies4eva wrote:The Father/Son rule is grossly unfair to Collywobbles.
How would a son know if his father played for that team?
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |