by Brodlach » Mon Feb 19, 2024 4:33 pm
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by LaughingKookaburra » Mon Feb 19, 2024 5:11 pm
wenchbarwer wrote:https://www.mondaq.com/australia/contract-of-employment/972202/payg-withholding--should-amateur-sporting-clubs-be-withholding-tax-from-match-payments-they-make-to-players
Interesting read, seems there's lots of grey areas
by The Big Shrek » Mon Feb 19, 2024 5:41 pm
by Jimmy_041 » Mon Feb 19, 2024 10:31 pm
tigerpie wrote:I find a $300 000 fine an exercise in futility . There's no way they are paying that back.
They'd struggle to pay back $30 000 by the sounds.
SANFL would need to suspend $300 000 of it which is a joke.
The monetary penalty has to be smaller but on field bigger.
Zero points for 5 years and sent to the lowest grade possible.
President, treasurer to be banned from holding office for ever.
If SANFL want to get really serious criminal penalties for players and officials.
by tigerpie » Mon Feb 19, 2024 10:53 pm
Jimmy_041 wrote:tigerpie wrote:I find a $300 000 fine an exercise in futility . There's no way they are paying that back.
They'd struggle to pay back $30 000 by the sounds.
SANFL would need to suspend $300 000 of it which is a joke.
The monetary penalty has to be smaller but on field bigger.
Zero points for 5 years and sent to the lowest grade possible.
President, treasurer to be banned from holding office for ever.
If SANFL want to get really serious criminal penalties for players and officials.
I haven’t read further down, and I’m not a footy administrator, but let’s be clear; the fine equals the breach
by whufc » Tue Feb 20, 2024 8:47 am
Jimmy_041 wrote:tigerpie wrote:I find a $300 000 fine an exercise in futility . There's no way they are paying that back.
They'd struggle to pay back $30 000 by the sounds.
SANFL would need to suspend $300 000 of it which is a joke.
The monetary penalty has to be smaller but on field bigger.
Zero points for 5 years and sent to the lowest grade possible.
President, treasurer to be banned from holding office for ever.
If SANFL want to get really serious criminal penalties for players and officials.
I haven’t read further down, and I’m not a footy administrator, but let’s be clear; the fine equals the breach
by LaughingKookaburra » Tue Feb 20, 2024 9:11 am
by amber_fluid » Tue Feb 20, 2024 9:14 am
by The Bedge » Tue Feb 20, 2024 9:20 am
tigerpie wrote:If SANFL want to get really serious criminal penalties for players and officials.
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by The Bedge » Tue Feb 20, 2024 9:41 am
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by tigerpie » Tue Feb 20, 2024 9:48 am
The Bedge wrote:There has been more times than I care to remember over the years when people have vehemently called for clubs to be booted from competition.
Salisbury West no longer exist.. Smithfield for a while copped plenty.. Central United for a bit.. Ingle Farm every time something happens... kick em out! Hell remember when the former Ingle Farm Chairman pulled the sides and used covid as an excuse? Every man and their dog wanted the club pulled down brick by brick FFS!
Granted all these clubs have messed up and weren't innocent in those times, but there was no sympathy or remorse for the "good people" at those clubs who were affected or going to be affected by it all.
Gaza have rorted the system and broke the rules for the best part of half a decade - they've potentially cost other clubs finals spots, grand final spots and promotions.. they lied and denied it.. the didn't cooperate.. They broke the rules and they deserve everything that comes their way. In fact I'd be surprised if it's only the last few years its occured.
by The Bedge » Tue Feb 20, 2024 9:53 am
tigerpie wrote:Who gets the $300 000?
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by Trader » Tue Feb 20, 2024 9:55 am
by Down the Hill » Tue Feb 20, 2024 10:03 am
by tigerpie » Tue Feb 20, 2024 10:26 am
Down the Hill wrote:Seriously Tigerpie - criminal penalties!!! Have you been smoking those grass clippings again!
Our courts struggle to penalise real criminals let alone adding another layer to what is considered criminal activity. I think the SANFL and Community Football Board have handled these cases fairly well and dished out penalties that pass the pub test. Gaza is a whole new level of offences so will be interesting what the final wash-up is.
But the SANFL can only deal with the cases that come before them which have mostly been whistleblower cases. Even most or all the Gaza offences could have stayed under the carpet forever if not for disgruntled ex-player(s).
by Jimmy_041 » Tue Feb 20, 2024 10:29 am
tigerpie wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:tigerpie wrote:I find a $300 000 fine an exercise in futility . There's no way they are paying that back.
They'd struggle to pay back $30 000 by the sounds.
SANFL would need to suspend $300 000 of it which is a joke.
The monetary penalty has to be smaller but on field bigger.
Zero points for 5 years and sent to the lowest grade possible.
President, treasurer to be banned from holding office for ever.
If SANFL want to get really serious criminal penalties for players and officials.
I haven’t read further down, and I’m not a footy administrator, but let’s be clear; the fine equals the breach
So shut the doors Jimmy?
by LaughingKookaburra » Tue Feb 20, 2024 10:30 am
tigerpie wrote:Down the Hill wrote:Seriously Tigerpie - criminal penalties!!! Have you been smoking those grass clippings again!
Our courts struggle to penalise real criminals let alone adding another layer to what is considered criminal activity. I think the SANFL and Community Football Board have handled these cases fairly well and dished out penalties that pass the pub test. Gaza is a whole new level of offences so will be interesting what the final wash-up is.
But the SANFL can only deal with the cases that come before them which have mostly been whistleblower cases. Even most or all the Gaza offences could have stayed under the carpet forever if not for disgruntled ex-player(s).
Given up smoking!
We all know or there's rumours of clubs fiddling the books for years.
Some still push the envelope (pardon the pun).
If you want to take away any temptation then legal ramifications will do it.
by tigerpie » Tue Feb 20, 2024 10:48 am
LaughingKookaburra wrote:tigerpie wrote:Down the Hill wrote:Seriously Tigerpie - criminal penalties!!! Have you been smoking those grass clippings again!
Our courts struggle to penalise real criminals let alone adding another layer to what is considered criminal activity. I think the SANFL and Community Football Board have handled these cases fairly well and dished out penalties that pass the pub test. Gaza is a whole new level of offences so will be interesting what the final wash-up is.
But the SANFL can only deal with the cases that come before them which have mostly been whistleblower cases. Even most or all the Gaza offences could have stayed under the carpet forever if not for disgruntled ex-player(s).
Given up smoking!
We all know or there's rumours of clubs fiddling the books for years.
Some still push the envelope (pardon the pun).
If you want to take away any temptation then legal ramifications will do it.
If it was only that simple…
by LaughingKookaburra » Tue Feb 20, 2024 11:00 am
tigerpie wrote:LaughingKookaburra wrote:tigerpie wrote:Down the Hill wrote:Seriously Tigerpie - criminal penalties!!! Have you been smoking those grass clippings again!
Our courts struggle to penalise real criminals let alone adding another layer to what is considered criminal activity. I think the SANFL and Community Football Board have handled these cases fairly well and dished out penalties that pass the pub test. Gaza is a whole new level of offences so will be interesting what the final wash-up is.
But the SANFL can only deal with the cases that come before them which have mostly been whistleblower cases. Even most or all the Gaza offences could have stayed under the carpet forever if not for disgruntled ex-player(s).
Given up smoking!
We all know or there's rumours of clubs fiddling the books for years.
Some still push the envelope (pardon the pun).
If you want to take away any temptation then legal ramifications will do it.
If it was only that simple…
Hmmmm criminal conviction versus paying a mercenary more than they're worth.
Easy answer.
by Dutchy » Tue Feb 20, 2024 11:11 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |