Schulz (HD) and Grosser (OSB) are two very dominant rucks also, whilst Dylan Male (HD) is kicking bags in A/B grade this year.
Don't mind Caleb Dean (OSB) bit to like about him - except his hair. Vandermoer brothers (HD) can play, but they've missed a lot of footy, Also Luke Cooper (MP) was great against us both times.
Also think the kid Stroud from Para Hills has a very bright future.
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
Schulz (HD) and Grosser (OSB) are two very dominant rucks also, whilst Dylan Male (HD) is kicking bags in A/B grade this year.
Don't mind Caleb Dean (OSB) bit to like about him - except his hair. Vandermoer brothers (HD) can play, but they've missed a lot of footy, Also Luke Cooper (MP) was great against us both times.
Also think the kid Stroud from Para Hills has a very bright future.
How is Mitch Slater not the best in the COMP or top 2 has me baffled along with Steven Osbourne not being in the top 10 ??????? Clearly these people who make up these lists do not do a lot of home work
They wouldnt do any homework, they would just use stats from playhq.
It's a quick easy click bait piece for the media knowing 1000's will click looking for their name or their friends name. It's not meant to be a serious indepth analaysis of a low division football league.
whufc wrote:They wouldnt do any homework, they would just use stats from playhq.
It's a quick easy click bait piece for the media knowing 1000's will click looking for their name or their friends name. It's not meant to be a serious indepth analaysis of a low division football league.
Correct.
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
whufc wrote:They wouldnt do any homework, they would just use stats from playhq.
It's a quick easy click bait piece for the media knowing 1000's will click looking for their name or their friends name. It's not meant to be a serious indepth analaysis of a low division football league.
Correct.
Not that I am saying this list is a "serious in-depth analysis" but If they just used stats from playhq then there would be Hackham, Mawson Lakes and Brahma blokes at the pointy end. But I reckon No 32 should be a lot higher up, and there are much better players than the No1 going around.
whufc wrote:They wouldnt do any homework, they would just use stats from playhq.
It's a quick easy click bait piece for the media knowing 1000's will click looking for their name or their friends name. It's not meant to be a serious indepth analaysis of a low division football league.
I wouldn't bet against Artificial Intelligence having written at least a fair chunk of it tbh
whufc wrote:They wouldnt do any homework, they would just use stats from playhq.
It's a quick easy click bait piece for the media knowing 1000's will click looking for their name or their friends name. It's not meant to be a serious indepth analaysis of a low division football league.
I wouldn't bet against Artificial Intelligence having written at least a fair chunk of it tbh
Sounds like the tribunal
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
ROUNDTHETRAPS wrote:Any idea yet on this weeks fixture? Will the reserves follow the A grade and play at para hills and lonsdale?
Should be out later today i'd say.
I suspect it'll be Para Hills will host their A/B grade, OSB will host the other two games.. unless OSB aren't eligible to host finals, but doubt that's the case.
Potential adjustment in start times to allow Houghton to go from OSB to Para Hills.
No C grade game for Para Hills this week, guess they could potentially host two B grade matches but that seems unlikely.
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..