mighty_tiger_79 wrote:combined 7 goals 20 under the roof
and raise you to 9.22
by locky801 » Sun May 07, 2023 6:58 pm
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:combined 7 goals 20 under the roof
by mighty_tiger_79 » Sun May 07, 2023 7:00 pm
locky801 wrote:mighty_tiger_79 wrote:combined 7 goals 20 under the roof
and raise you to 9.22
by mots02 » Sun May 07, 2023 7:40 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Match for the ages at Marvel
by The Dark Knight » Sun May 07, 2023 8:00 pm
Absolute grind of a game but another loss for North, six in a row now. The novelty of Clarko has definitely worn off and surely they won't finish above the bottom four now.Armchair expert wrote:Match for the ages at Marvel
by Armchair expert » Sun May 07, 2023 8:04 pm
by The Dark Knight » Sun May 07, 2023 8:09 pm
They were on early, Draper was giving Teakle a bath and his mids first use as the Bombers ball use inside 50 hitting their forwards looked ominous for Port. After their start they really died off in the second half and Ports terrible inaccuracy kept them from really over running over Essendon.Jim05 wrote:Just another loss by this weak club.
by Lightning McQueen » Sun May 07, 2023 8:28 pm
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:combined 7 goals 20 under the roof
by Wedgie » Sun May 07, 2023 8:51 pm
Armchair expert wrote:JHF looked a bit sore today might rest him next week
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Jim05 » Sun May 07, 2023 10:41 pm
Lost all structure when Rioli took out Ridley. We were already undermanned and short in defence and by having to send Langford back we ended up losing out in two areas. Just a horribly skilled side aswell which doesn’t help as the better sides punish all our mistakes every week. Another bottom 6-8 year coming up and I’d be happy to let Parish and Redman go to give us 3 top 10 picks if we had a competent list management team but we don’t so Brad is stuck with this woeful listThe Dark Knight wrote:They were on early, Draper was giving Teakle a bath and his mids first use as the Bombers ball use inside 50 hitting their forwards looked ominous for Port. After their start they really died off in the second half and Ports terrible inaccuracy kept them from really over running over Essendon.Jim05 wrote:Just another loss by this weak club.
Their game today was almost the opposite to last weak where they started really slow against the Cats.
Essendon v Port 1st quarter 6.1 and the next 3 kicked 7.8.
Essendon v Geelong 1st quarter 2.0 and the next 3 kicked 14.8
by Booney » Mon May 08, 2023 9:49 am
Jim05 wrote:The Dark Knight wrote:They were on early, Draper was giving Teakle a bath and his mids first use as the Bombers ball use inside 50 hitting their forwards looked ominous for Port. After their start they really died off in the second half and Ports terrible inaccuracy kept them from really over running over Essendon.Jim05 wrote:Just another loss by this weak club.
Their game today was almost the opposite to last weak where they started really slow against the Cats.
Essendon v Port 1st quarter 6.1 and the next 3 kicked 7.8.
Essendon v Geelong 1st quarter 2.0 and the next 3 kicked 14.8
Lost all structure when Rioli took out Ridley. We were already undermanned and short in defence and by having to send Langford back we ended up losing out in two areas. Just a horribly skilled side aswell which doesn’t help as the better sides punish all our mistakes every week. Another bottom 6-8 year coming up and I’d be happy to let Parish and Redman go to give us 3 top 10 picks if we had a competent list management team but we don’t so Brad is stuck with this woeful list
by Booney » Mon May 08, 2023 9:53 am
Rik E Boy wrote:Jim05 wrote:Rioli should get a couple of weeks for his dog act. Going to stuff up our structure badly now
Match winning move by Rioli. Deserves weeks for sure.
regards,
REB
by Jim05 » Mon May 08, 2023 10:12 am
Went off with concussion and will miss this week. Will be graded careless, high, high which is a 2 week suspensionBooney wrote:Jim05 wrote:The Dark Knight wrote:They were on early, Draper was giving Teakle a bath and his mids first use as the Bombers ball use inside 50 hitting their forwards looked ominous for Port. After their start they really died off in the second half and Ports terrible inaccuracy kept them from really over running over Essendon.Jim05 wrote:Just another loss by this weak club.
Their game today was almost the opposite to last weak where they started really slow against the Cats.
Essendon v Port 1st quarter 6.1 and the next 3 kicked 7.8.
Essendon v Geelong 1st quarter 2.0 and the next 3 kicked 14.8
Lost all structure when Rioli took out Ridley. We were already undermanned and short in defence and by having to send Langford back we ended up losing out in two areas. Just a horribly skilled side aswell which doesn’t help as the better sides punish all our mistakes every week. Another bottom 6-8 year coming up and I’d be happy to let Parish and Redman go to give us 3 top 10 picks if we had a competent list management team but we don’t so Brad is stuck with this woeful list
That glancing blow across the chest really took him out.
by Booney » Mon May 08, 2023 10:14 am
by Jim05 » Mon May 08, 2023 10:24 am
His arm made contact to the head.Booney wrote:From when he hit the ground?
by am Bays » Mon May 08, 2023 10:33 am
Jim05 wrote:Went off with concussion and will miss this week. Will be graded careless, high, high which is a 2 week suspensionBooney wrote:Jim05 wrote:
Lost all structure when Rioli took out Ridley. We were already undermanned and short in defence and by having to send Langford back we ended up losing out in two areas. Just a horribly skilled side aswell which doesn’t help as the better sides punish all our mistakes every week. Another bottom 6-8 year coming up and I’d be happy to let Parish and Redman go to give us 3 top 10 picks if we had a competent list management team but we don’t so Brad is stuck with this woeful list
That glancing blow across the chest really took him out.
by Booney » Mon May 08, 2023 10:37 am
by Jim05 » Mon May 08, 2023 10:42 am
I didn’t catch his name this morning but heard some bozo on SEN say that it will be graded intentional which ups it 3-4.Booney wrote:Who was saying 3 or 4?
More than 1 will be a stinking decision.
by am Bays » Mon May 08, 2023 10:45 am
Booney wrote:Who was saying 3 or 4?
More than 1 will be a stinking decision.
by Spargo » Mon May 08, 2023 10:51 am
Booney wrote:Who was saying 3 or 4?
More than 1 will be a stinking decision.
by am Bays » Mon May 08, 2023 10:54 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |