mal wrote:amber_fluid wrote:mal wrote:Warner needs to play shots
sitting duck if he defends
He heard you
Down the track on drive 4
Cover drive 4
DefendsLBW
![]()
The Prosection rests
thats GOLD MaL
mal wrote:amber_fluid wrote:mal wrote:Warner needs to play shots
sitting duck if he defends
He heard you
Down the track on drive 4
Cover drive 4
DefendsLBW
![]()
The Prosection rests
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
Brodlach wrote:Embarrassing
RB wrote:1. Gabba test is irrelevant to whether the Nagpur pitch is 'doctored'.Dutchy wrote:so where is the evidence?
Lets not forget the Gabba 2 day test recently [emoji38]
2. Given the strength of RSA's pace attack the Gabba pitch wasn't particularly to our advantage, heading in to the match. Also I hardly think the board wanted a 2-day test. Just a howler from the grounds staff.
The end is coming quick now!locky801 wrote:Going to be bowled out in less than a session it seems![]()

Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
Brodlach wrote:Make the batsman bat in the nets the next two days non stop for hours
Starc in for Boland?PatowalongaPirate wrote:Hopefully Green comes good, he comes in with Head and Renshaw and Handscomb out. Boland toiled well but may lose his spot.
PS, just because a team loses due to being inferior during the Test doesn't mean the pitch wasn't doctored. The intent in the preparing of the pitch should be sanctioned. The better team won.
PatowalongaPirate wrote:Hopefully Green comes good, he comes in with Head and Renshaw and Handscomb out. Boland toiled well but may lose his spot.
PS, just because a team loses due to being inferior during the Test doesn't mean the pitch wasn't doctored. The intent in the preparing of the pitch should be sanctioned. The better team won.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 92 guests