Blem12 wrote:Dallas Hill has just signed with GG.
Good get.
Has talent but would want to have a better attitude than he did at Centrals and North Clare.
by whufc » Mon Oct 10, 2022 10:04 am
Blem12 wrote:Dallas Hill has just signed with GG.
Good get.
by Blem12 » Mon Oct 10, 2022 10:05 am
Lightning McQueen wrote:Blem12 wrote:Dallas Hill has just signed with GG.
Good get.
Has Edwards been confirmed yet?
by Fools Gold » Mon Oct 10, 2022 10:28 am
Not happeningLightning McQueen wrote:Blem12 wrote:.
Has Edwards been confirmed yet?
by marbles » Mon Oct 10, 2022 2:37 pm
Footy Chick wrote:marbles wrote:who are the teams next year in this div
getting around to that - got busy at work
by The Bedge » Thu Oct 13, 2022 10:29 am
jo172 wrote:Another interesting point is whether the filing fee/legal fees should properly be declared under the salary cap if they weren't being paid (directly or indirectly) by Jesse himself.
On the face of it it would seem to me yes.
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by jo172 » Thu Oct 13, 2022 7:43 pm
The Bedge wrote:jo172 wrote:Another interesting point is whether the filing fee/legal fees should properly be declared under the salary cap if they weren't being paid (directly or indirectly) by Jesse himself.
On the face of it it would seem to me yes.
Did we end up finding or deciding on an answer for this, regarding Broadies and White?
by Footy Chick » Thu Oct 13, 2022 10:05 pm
jo172 wrote:The Bedge wrote:jo172 wrote:Another interesting point is whether the filing fee/legal fees should properly be declared under the salary cap if they weren't being paid (directly or indirectly) by Jesse himself.
On the face of it it would seem to me yes.
Did we end up finding or deciding on an answer for this, regarding Broadies and White?
Assuming White didn’t obtain an indemnity order on costs (which given the nature of the matter would be amazing) this is something if I was Rostrevor and wanted to stay in D1 I’d be making loud noises about.
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by DOC » Thu Oct 13, 2022 11:28 pm
by jo172 » Fri Oct 14, 2022 3:24 pm
by Trader » Fri Oct 14, 2022 3:36 pm
jo172 wrote:http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/sa/SASC//2022/113.html
Ooft 30% on a taxation going to take a lot of match fees to get back!
by DOC » Fri Oct 14, 2022 4:17 pm
Trader wrote:jo172 wrote:http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/sa/SASC//2022/113.html
Ooft 30% on a taxation going to take a lot of match fees to get back!
For those of us that are not legally minded, what's the summary?
My read was the courts have found that SAAFL have to pay one third of White's legal fees?
If so, guessing that his legal fees may have been say $15k, White's effectively in the hole for $10k, all to earn $400 for that match he got to play.
by jo172 » Fri Oct 14, 2022 4:19 pm
by DOC » Fri Oct 14, 2022 4:26 pm
jo172 wrote:In essence a taxed costs order means you get costs on the court scale as opposed to indemnity costs that are costs actually (and reasonably) incurred.
As a general rule of thumb a taxed costs order will be between 66% and 75% of costs actually incurred.
Given White was represented by (now) Kings Counsel, and the matter wasn’t certified for senior counsel he’d be out of pocket there.
I would suspect actual costs incurred would be between $20k and $30k indicating on a taxed 30% basis you might get $5k to $8k back from the other party (which is presumably insured).
Would suggest to me White would be $15k to $20k out of pocket at a guess
by redyellow&blue » Fri Oct 14, 2022 4:40 pm
by jo172 » Fri Oct 14, 2022 4:49 pm
redyellow&blue wrote:So is White paying it, or did Broadies stump it up? I would be surprised if White paid it himself.....
by TIRED TIGER » Sun Oct 16, 2022 9:37 am
Trader wrote:jo172 wrote:http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/sa/SASC//2022/113.html
Ooft 30% on a taxation going to take a lot of match fees to get back!
For those of us that are not legally minded, what's the summary?
My read was the courts have found that SAAFL have to pay one third of White's legal fees?
If so, guessing that his legal fees may have been say $15k, White's effectively in the hole for $10k, all to earn $400 for that match he got to play.
by jo172 » Sun Oct 16, 2022 11:50 am
by wristwatcher » Sun Oct 16, 2022 3:08 pm
by wristwatcher » Sun Oct 16, 2022 3:08 pm
by TheTranzlator » Wed Oct 19, 2022 9:04 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |