The South Australian Political Landscape

Labor, Liberal, Greens, Democrats? Here's the place to discuss.
Post Reply
Dinglinga75
Under 16s
Posts: 334
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2020 2:18 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Team: Salisbury
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by Dinglinga75 »

turmoil in the Lib ranks already
Shadow Ministry for Regional
Who shall they pick

A) One of few Libs to have a swing towards them in (7%)
B) Bloke who had a 22% swing against in a safe Liberal seat

Matt Cowdrey didnt deny before the last election if he wasn't promoted within the party he wouldn't run for Colton.
User avatar
rd
Under 18s
Posts: 747
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 2:37 pm
Team: Sturt
Team: Adelaide Crows
Location: Double Blue Heaven.
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by rd »

jo172 wrote:Genuinely filthy about having to vote three times in three months.


Shouldn't be a by election happening.

If you win a seat and resign within twelve months - unless you have died or are suffering severe health issues - the seat should go to who ever finished 2nd in the last election...

That would stop the Vickie's of the political world giving the "up yours" to the citizens they supposedly represent.
User avatar
Booney
Coach
Posts: 64099
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:17 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Location: Alberton proud
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by Booney »

I've never seen a more disgusting snout in trough moment than this one from Chapman.

To receive the maximum parliamentary pension ( $300,984 per year ) you have to serve 20 years and 1 month.

1 month after the election Chapman resigns, triggering a by-election that could cost upwards of $700,000.

You guessed, upon announcing her retirement she'd served 20 years and 1 month. What a pig.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
MW
Coach
Posts: 14197
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 9:25 pm
Team: West Adelaide
Team: Adelaide Crows
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by MW »

Booney wrote:I've never seen a more disgusting snout in trough moment than this one from Chapman.

To receive the maximum parliamentary pension ( $300,984 per year ) you have to serve 20 years and 1 month.

1 month after the election Chapman resigns, triggering a by-election that could cost upwards of $700,000.

You guessed, upon announcing her retirement she'd served 20 years and 1 month. What a pig.


Hate to defend a pollie, but anyone of us would have done the same in the same situation.
User avatar
Booney
Coach
Posts: 64099
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:17 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Location: Alberton proud
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by Booney »

MW wrote:
Booney wrote:I've never seen a more disgusting snout in trough moment than this one from Chapman.

To receive the maximum parliamentary pension ( $300,984 per year ) you have to serve 20 years and 1 month.

1 month after the election Chapman resigns, triggering a by-election that could cost upwards of $700,000.

You guessed, upon announcing her retirement she'd served 20 years and 1 month. What a pig.


Hate to defend a pollie, but anyone of us would have done the same in the same situation.


Not with a clear conscience.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
User avatar
RB
Coach
Posts: 6639
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 3:15 pm
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by RB »

Booney wrote:I've never seen a more disgusting snout in trough moment than this one from Chapman.

To receive the maximum parliamentary pension ( $300,984 per year ) you have to serve 20 years and 1 month.

1 month after the election Chapman resigns, triggering a by-election that could cost upwards of $700,000.

You guessed, upon announcing her retirement she'd served 20 years and 1 month. What a pig.


I totally agree that she should not have run for election again without intending to serve out her term, but she was first elected on 9 February 2002, so she would already have served the 20 years and one month prior to this year's election.
R.I.P. the SANFL 1877 - 2013
User avatar
Jimmy_041
Coach
Posts: 15660
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 6:00 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Collingwood
Team: Port District
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by Jimmy_041 »

RB wrote:
Booney wrote:I've never seen a more disgusting snout in trough moment than this one from Chapman.

To receive the maximum parliamentary pension ( $300,984 per year ) you have to serve 20 years and 1 month.

1 month after the election Chapman resigns, triggering a by-election that could cost upwards of $700,000.

You guessed, upon announcing her retirement she'd served 20 years and 1 month. What a pig.


I totally agree that she should not have run for election again without intending to serve out her term, but she was first elected on 9 February 2002, so she would already have served the 20 years and one month prior to this year's election.


As I have said previously, she would have stayed on had they won the election.
Weatherill and Rau did the same thing but waited 9 months. It happens more oftern than not.
She's actually done the right thing - the Liberals need to get some good new people in there because they are very thin
Silly woman should have put herself up for SC like Rau did. Now that was not good!

I am surprised that Gardiner is deputy. I've never met him but he comes across as a complete doofus
dedja: Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
Posts: 20533
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:34 pm
Team: Glenelg
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by am Bays »

Booney wrote:I've never seen a more disgusting snout in trough moment than this one from Chapman.

To receive the maximum parliamentary pension ( $300,984 per year ) you have to serve 20 years and 1 month.

1 month after the election Chapman resigns, triggering a by-election that could cost upwards of $700,000.

You guessed, upon announcing her retirement she'd served 20 years and 1 month. What a pig.


It smells to high heaven should've been made to wait at least 12 months and then transition out

You're wrong Booney Bernard Finnegan staying on the public tit whilst facing kiddy p0rn charges will never be beaten as a snout in the trough moment and the nadir of South Australian politics. With Rann et al complicit in allowing him to stay as an MLC so if worst come to the worst they have get his vote even though he was kicked out of the party.

Labor even re-pre-selected his protector Don Farrell to be a Senator. FMD *oink*
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
User avatar
RB
Coach
Posts: 6639
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 3:15 pm
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by RB »

am Bays wrote:You're wrong Booney Bernard Finnegan staying on the public tit whilst facing kiddy p0rn charges will never be beaten as a snout in the trough moment and the nadir of South Australian politics. With Rann et al complicit in allowing him to stay as an MLC so if worst come to the worst they have get his vote even though he was kicked out of the party.


What do you think Rann et al could have done to prevent Finnegan remaining an MLC?
R.I.P. the SANFL 1877 - 2013
jo172
Veteran
Posts: 3602
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 5:30 pm
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by jo172 »

Jimmy_041 wrote:
RB wrote:
Booney wrote:I've never seen a more disgusting snout in trough moment than this one from Chapman.

To receive the maximum parliamentary pension ( $300,984 per year ) you have to serve 20 years and 1 month.

1 month after the election Chapman resigns, triggering a by-election that could cost upwards of $700,000.

You guessed, upon announcing her retirement she'd served 20 years and 1 month. What a pig.


I totally agree that she should not have run for election again without intending to serve out her term, but she was first elected on 9 February 2002, so she would already have served the 20 years and one month prior to this year's election.


As I have said previously, she would have stayed on had they won the election.
Weatherill and Rau did the same thing but waited 9 months. It happens more oftern than not.
She's actually done the right thing - the Liberals need to get some good new people in there because they are very thin
Silly woman should have put herself up for SC like Rau did. Now that was not good!

I am surprised that Gardiner is deputy. I've never met him but he comes across as a complete doofus


A good mate's missus is his ex. Some stories she can tell
Jim05
Coach
Posts: 49466
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 8:33 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Essendon
Team: South Gawler
Contact:

The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by Jim05 »

So for the first time ever SA gets a One Nation MP
User avatar
Jimmy_041
Coach
Posts: 15660
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 6:00 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Collingwood
Team: Port District
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by Jimmy_041 »

Jim05 wrote:So for the first time ever SA gets a One Nation MP


and Prince Russell Wortley gets to fill his pockets even more
dedja: Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
User avatar
stan
Coach
Posts: 15668
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:23 am
Team: Norwood
Team: West Coast Eagles
Team: Goodwood Saints
Location: North Eastern Suburbs
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by stan »

Jim05 wrote:So for the first time ever SA gets a One Nation MP
Should be interesting in the mix of SAs mornic crop.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
jo172
Veteran
Posts: 3602
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 5:30 pm
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by jo172 »

Jimmy_041 wrote:
Jim05 wrote:So for the first time ever SA gets a One Nation MP


and Prince Russell Wortley gets to fill his pockets even more


He'll actually be dirty. Was running again to get the redundancy pension. Now he has to at least feign an effort to earn a pay packet.
User avatar
DOC
Coach
Posts: 20240
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Team: South Adelaide
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by DOC »

Not eligibile.
Dinglinga75
Under 16s
Posts: 334
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2020 2:18 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Team: Salisbury
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by Dinglinga75 »

Vicki why dont you just stay home .....
jo172
Veteran
Posts: 3602
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 5:30 pm
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by jo172 »

After masterminding the gutting of ICAC Labor installs Terry Stephens as President of the House of Assembly.

Very hard to reconcile Malinauskas' position on corruption with that of federal Labor.
User avatar
Jimmy_041
Coach
Posts: 15660
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 6:00 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Collingwood
Team: Port District
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by Jimmy_041 »

Booney wrote:I've never seen a more disgusting snout in trough moment than this one from Chapman.

To receive the maximum parliamentary pension ( $300,984 per year ) you have to serve 20 years and 1 month.

1 month after the election Chapman resigns, triggering a by-election that could cost upwards of $700,000.

You guessed, upon announcing her retirement she'd served 20 years and 1 month. What a pig.
Attachments
Grub.png
Grub.png (266.13 KiB) Viewed 5886 times
dedja: Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
User avatar
RB
Coach
Posts: 6639
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 3:15 pm
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by RB »

Jimmy_041 wrote:
RB wrote:
Jimmy_041 wrote:
Brodlach wrote:When are the final election results due?


Here is the result as of today: https://www.abc.net.au/news/elections/s ... lc-results

I haven't worked out the numbers Labor have


ALP 27, LIB 16, IND 4 in the House of Assembly, and (likely) ALP 9, LIB 8, GRN 2, SAB 2, One Nation 1 in the Upper House.


Makes the President important then
They are going to do everything to lure one of the SAB or ON people
I know its not about their personal gain with these people but:
Nice salary (75% more) / car + driver / big swinging dick...........
Who's going to be tempted...... =P~


I had fully expected this to be the case. A member of the opposition on the other hand...
R.I.P. the SANFL 1877 - 2013
User avatar
Jimmy_041
Coach
Posts: 15660
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 6:00 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Collingwood
Team: Port District
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by Jimmy_041 »

RB wrote:
Jimmy_041 wrote:
RB wrote:
Makes the President important then
They are going to do everything to lure one of the SAB or ON people
I know its not about their personal gain with these people but:
Nice salary (75% more) / car + driver / big swinging dick...........
Who's going to be tempted...... =P~


I had fully expected this to be the case. A member of the opposition on the other hand...


That comment was very tongue in cheek and Stephens took it with both hands
Making up for the lost allowances.............
dedja: Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests