by FOURTH ESTATE » Sun Apr 03, 2022 10:49 am
by blublurag » Sun Apr 03, 2022 10:56 am
by zedman » Sun Apr 03, 2022 11:01 am
FOURTH ESTATE wrote:The new system PLAYHQ certainly has it quirks.
The Premiership table has the percentages AFL style. For some teams this might be a good thing if they got smashed in round 1 as they still have a percentage of + 50%
You still don't get a finalized team sheet at the end of the day once you have keyed in your goal kickers and best players.
You still have to fill it out by hand if you want to keep a record.
I most definitely do not like the look up score report.
It now shows what gets kicked for the qtr. not the accumulative score. Something that we have all grown up with.
It just looks untidy from my point of view.
For years we have always keyed in the accumulative score now this. Members were asking why does it look like that or words to that effect or did I screw up when putting the score in.
When I explained it to them the answers were not exactly printable for this forum.
Thoughts????
by Sass! » Sun Apr 03, 2022 11:26 am
by Armchair expert » Sun Apr 03, 2022 11:33 am
by Brodlach » Sun Apr 03, 2022 12:12 pm
Sass! wrote:Definitely created its head aches for me yesterday.. It was always going to have teething issues but it was an additonal headache for round 1!
the adding of scores and best players after the game is significantly easier than Game Day in my view, and in a couple of months time i am hoping alot of the kinks have been ironed out. Its come a long way in a few months and actually seems like there is significant investment in getting it right for end users.
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by Down the Hill » Sun Apr 03, 2022 12:19 pm
by Sass! » Sun Apr 03, 2022 7:27 pm
by Bluedemon » Tue Apr 05, 2022 12:03 pm
by scottroo » Tue Apr 05, 2022 12:12 pm
by Jim05 » Tue Apr 05, 2022 12:27 pm
by gadj1976 » Tue Apr 05, 2022 12:39 pm
Jim05 wrote:Just wait to cricket season. People have spent years learning mycricket and now have to swap
by Footy Chick » Tue Apr 05, 2022 4:30 pm
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by gadj1976 » Tue Apr 05, 2022 4:35 pm
by Mr Beefy » Tue Apr 05, 2022 5:09 pm
I don't think the big comps in Melb are using it, the AFL are probably fine with it...Footy Chick wrote:Do we take some cold comfort that AFL would be copping from everyone ?
Apparently the head of AFL Community in Melbourne has copped some tongue acid on Monday that had the AFL guy needing to look up some of the words in the Dictionary used to describe the system and I dare say the AFL too. [emoji38]
Plenty of other comps having just a hard time of it...
by Password Please » Fri Apr 08, 2022 10:40 am
by Barkeroo » Fri Apr 08, 2022 11:33 am
by gadj1976 » Wed Apr 13, 2022 2:45 pm
by Down the Hill » Wed Apr 13, 2022 4:55 pm
by gadj1976 » Wed Apr 13, 2022 5:55 pm
Down the Hill wrote:It seems the system has a default setting that only allows you to allocate players to a team who turn that age in the current year. e.g. only a child born in 2008 can be allocated to an Under 14 team. This is obviously stupid and the league should be able to adjust the parameters to allow a wider range of ages for selection in a team. If the league can't then they need to get PlayHQ to change the settings. Can't answer the gender one but in the AdFL there were some issues with team selections for non-binary in male and female comps but the league was able to change the settings at their end to allow this.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |