AFL Round 13

Talk on the national game
User avatar
locky801
Coach
Posts: 60792
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 4:41 pm
Location: working all around Australia and loving it
Has thanked: 4867 times
Been thanked: 1566 times
Contact:

Re: AFL Round 13

Post by locky801 »

Senor Moto Gadili wrote:
Armchair expert wrote:
Senor Moto Gadili wrote:Whether we like it or not, the tribunal will more than likely suspend McKay. Hunter Clarke's face is a mess, three fractures and neeve and teeth damage. He will probably miss the rest of the season and may suffer the effects for the rest of his life. Because of the severity of his injuries, they will feel the need to take action. Will be interesting to see how it plays out. Either way, the game will survive. Teams may just have to live with players missing a few weeks when they crack in hard and someone accidentally gets hurt.


That is the thing though, the AFL does not want players to 'crack in hard"

that is why Mackay will be suspended even though they have to make up some bs to punish him.

Have a look at the score when it happened. Up until then the Crows were pathetic, but Mackay turned that game. The Crows coaching staff will never come out and admit it, but behind closed doors they would be praising him for what he did. I bet it gets him votes in their B&F.


Didnt you see the after match press conference with Nicks, he basically said that the incident started the momentum swing
Life is about moments, Create them
Brodlach
Coach
Posts: 51603
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 1:48 pm
Team: West Adelaide
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Colonel Light Gardens
Location: Unley
Has thanked: 72 times
Been thanked: 5256 times
Contact:

Re: AFL Round 13

Post by Brodlach »

MacKay has always been maligned for being an outside player, good on him for his attack on the ball
July 11th 2012....
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods



2024 Melbourne Cup Punting Challenge winner knocking off the Pirate King!
User avatar
amber_fluid
Coach
Posts: 16423
Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 9:48 am
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Carlton
Has thanked: 2468 times
Been thanked: 3047 times
Contact:

Re: AFL Round 13

Post by amber_fluid »

Brodlach wrote:MacKay has always been maligned for being an outside player, good on him for his attack on the ball


He’s been called soft by supporters in the past and when he does attack the ball and body he gets suspended.
It’s ridiculous.
There are no stupid questions, just stupid people.
daysofourlives
Coach
Posts: 12082
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 3:05 pm
Team: Central District
Team: Hawthorn
Team: Angaston
Has thanked: 2691 times
Been thanked: 1788 times
Contact:

Re: AFL Round 13

Post by daysofourlives »

Anyone remember the incident with Tex, i think it was last year, maybe Hurn was the opponent? It may have been a different situation, maybe a marking contest?
All the so called experts had a go at him for being soft and pulling out of a contest. Think it was discussed ad nauseum on here and in the media, i think Booney amongst others(probably myself included) took great pleasure in having a crack at him. Those same experts are now saying McKay shouldve pulled out. The guy cant win, either way they rip into him.
Its absolutely ridiculous to say he shouldve pulled up.
Supercoach Spring Racing Champion 2019
Spargo's Good Friday Cup Champion 2020
User avatar
amber_fluid
Coach
Posts: 16423
Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 9:48 am
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Carlton
Has thanked: 2468 times
Been thanked: 3047 times
Contact:

Re: AFL Round 13

Post by amber_fluid »

daysofourlives wrote:Anyone remember the incident with Tex, i think it was last year, maybe Hurn was the opponent? It may have been a different situation, maybe a marking contest?
All the so called experts had a go at him for being soft and pulling out of a contest. Think it was discussed ad nauseum on here and in the media, i think Booney amongst others(probably myself included) took great pleasure in having a crack at him. Those same experts are now saying McKay shouldve pulled out. The guy cant win, either way they rip into him.
Its absolutely ridiculous to say he shouldve pulled up.


Yep if you are pulling up it’s time to go play soccer!
There are no stupid questions, just stupid people.
User avatar
stan
Coach
Posts: 15668
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:23 am
Team: Norwood
Team: West Coast Eagles
Team: Goodwood Saints
Location: North Eastern Suburbs
Has thanked: 88 times
Been thanked: 1332 times
Contact:

Re: AFL Round 13

Post by stan »

daysofourlives wrote:Anyone remember the incident with Tex, i think it was last year, maybe Hurn was the opponent? It may have been a different situation, maybe a marking contest?
All the so called experts had a go at him for being soft and pulling out of a contest. Think it was discussed ad nauseum on here and in the media, i think Booney amongst others(probably myself included) took great pleasure in having a crack at him. Those same experts are now saying McKay shouldve pulled out. The guy cant win, either way they rip into him.
Its absolutely ridiculous to say he shouldve pulled up.
100% spot on here. It was 2019 I think when Tex tried to be a bit cute and looked like he backed out of a contest, copped it hard for doing so.
Now we are saying players need to pull out of a contest.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
Brodlach
Coach
Posts: 51603
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 1:48 pm
Team: West Adelaide
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Colonel Light Gardens
Location: Unley
Has thanked: 72 times
Been thanked: 5256 times
Contact:

Re: AFL Round 13

Post by Brodlach »

daysofourlives wrote:Anyone remember the incident with Tex, i think it was last year, maybe Hurn was the opponent? It may have been a different situation, maybe a marking contest?
All the so called experts had a go at him for being soft and pulling out of a contest. Think it was discussed ad nauseum on here and in the media, i think Booney amongst others(probably myself included) took great pleasure in having a crack at him. Those same experts are now saying McKay shouldve pulled out. The guy cant win, either way they rip into him.
Its absolutely ridiculous to say he shouldve pulled up.

Tex= trendsetter


Tex was reported a few weeks earlier than this and he didn’t want to get reported again. Wasn’t a good look. .
July 11th 2012....
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods



2024 Melbourne Cup Punting Challenge winner knocking off the Pirate King!
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
Posts: 47486
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:54 am
Team: Glenelg
Team: North Melbourne
Location: Location, Location
Has thanked: 2937 times
Been thanked: 4844 times
Contact:

Re: AFL Round 13

Post by Dutchy »

AFL coaching books actually teach drills for juniors around turning the body into pressure when collecting a ground ball and not leaving yourself open like Hunter Clark did.
User avatar
mots02
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4341
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 4:12 pm
Team: Sturt
Team: Gold Coast Suns
Team: Reynella
Has thanked: 205 times
Been thanked: 1341 times
Contact:

Re: AFL Round 13

Post by mots02 »

Dutchy wrote:
Booney wrote:
amber_fluid wrote:Are we at the point where we suspend someone if an injury occurs from any sort of contact?
McKay did nothing wrong, it was a footy collision.
Injuries happen, always have, always will!


If they consider you had an alternative / option, yes.


Hunter Clark had an alternative also, how far do you take it?


One of Clark's alternatives would have been to also brace for contact, instead of leading with his head.

In that case, they both would likely have bounced off each others shoulder, the ball would gave bounced free, Clark would have played on and we wouldn't be discussing this.

The AFL bang on about players having 'duty of care'... that has to be a 2 way street.
tigerpie
Coach
Posts: 5098
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2011 1:30 pm
Team: Glenelg
Team: Collingwood
Has thanked: 651 times
Been thanked: 529 times
Contact:

Re: AFL Round 13

Post by tigerpie »

mots02 wrote:
Dutchy wrote:
Booney wrote:
amber_fluid wrote:Are we at the point where we suspend someone if an injury occurs from any sort of contact?
McKay did nothing wrong, it was a footy collision.
Injuries happen, always have, always will!


If they consider you had an alternative / option, yes.


Hunter Clark had an alternative also, how far do you take it?


One of Clark's alternatives would have been to also brace for contact, instead of leading with his head.

In that case, they both would likely have bounced off each others shoulder, the ball would gave bounced free, Clark would have played on and we wouldn't be discussing this.

The AFL bang on about players having 'duty of care'... that has to be a 2 way street.

Players ARE leading with their heads and flopping heads on the ground to draw free kicks.
No different to selwood ducking for free kicks and getting constant head cuts.
User avatar
saintal
Coach
Posts: 5886
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 9:01 pm
Team: South Adelaide
Team: St Kilda
Location: Adelaide Hills
Has thanked: 380 times
Been thanked: 488 times
Contact:

Re: AFL Round 13

Post by saintal »

It's possibly slipped under the radar due to the McKay situation, but thought Worpel was stiff to get a week and was surprised the Hawks didn't challenge it.
SAFC- 60 years...
StKFC- 58 years..
User avatar
Mythical Creature
Veteran
Posts: 3584
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 11:52 am
Team: North Melbourne
Team: United
Has thanked: 189 times
Been thanked: 241 times
Contact:

Re: AFL Round 13

Post by Mythical Creature »

The de goey hit on Oliver is worse. He lined him up and luckily just clipped him.
McKay very unlucky to be sighted. Should get off no probs.
Unfortunately in an impact sport injuries are going to happen.
I would rather cop an injury like that where it is a pure accident, than cop a similar injury for something that is deliberate
If you don't like it, change it. If you don't want to change it, it can't be that bad!
User avatar
JK
Coach
Posts: 37469
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:41 am
Team: Norwood
Team: SMOSH West Lakes
Location: Coopers Hill
Has thanked: 4509 times
Been thanked: 3028 times
Contact:

Re: AFL Round 13

Post by JK »

McKay should get off, but I'll be surprised if he does. It's pretty clear the AFL want him rubbed out and they usually get what they want.

Massive ruling this, how long until the action around knee's gets targeted and we say goodbye to the speccy and centre bounces become basketball like "Jump Ball" situations?
FUSC
whufc
Coach
Posts: 29216
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:26 am
Team: Central District
Team: BSR
Location: Blakeview
Has thanked: 6065 times
Been thanked: 2933 times
Contact:

Re: AFL Round 13

Post by whufc »

JK wrote:McKay should get off, but I'll be surprised if he does. It's pretty clear the AFL want him rubbed out and they usually get what they want.

Massive ruling this, how long until the action around knee's gets targeted and we say goodbye to the speccy and centre bounces become basketball like "Jump Ball" situations?


Yeah we are one injury away where a ruckmen gets caught sitting under a bad bounce from the bounce being eliminated from the game.

I don't agree with Mackay being suspended but its clear as day as to where the AFL is heading, they haven't really made a secret about it yet the masses continue to show up each week, watch on tv etc. Whilst they are still getting the tv ratings they will vindicated in their decision making and approach.
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
FlyingHigh
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4948
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 10:42 am
Has thanked: 99 times
Been thanked: 184 times
Contact:

Re: AFL Round 13

Post by FlyingHigh »

To stick up for the AFL (which usually I don't do) we're all saying "this is where the AFL is heading" etc etc, but perhaps they don't particularly like or want it to be how the game looks or is played, but their hands are being forced, unlike some of the other silly rules they have brought in.
User avatar
Zelezny Chucks
League - Best 21
Posts: 2080
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 6:27 pm
Team: North Melbourne
Team: Morphett Vale
Has thanked: 22 times
Been thanked: 99 times
Contact:

Re: AFL Round 13

Post by Zelezny Chucks »

FlyingHigh wrote:To stick up for the AFL (which usually I don't do) we're all saying "this is where the AFL is heading" etc etc, but perhaps they don't particularly like or want it to be how the game looks or is played, but their hands are being forced, unlike some of the other silly rules they have brought in.


That argument would hold water if they were as hot on dirty hits behind the play or stamping out the kind of acts that Mumford got away with on the weekend - twice I might add. Until they separate intent and result they will continue to happen.

First thing judged in any incident should be was it an act you could expect on the footy field during a normal contest. If the answer is no then it should be instantly 2 weeks and go from there with severity of outcome. This BS of people getting off because the contact was insufficient when trying to elbow someone in the head is a joke.

Mackay is effectively being punished because he was better at protecting himself than Clark, if he ran in face first and they both got injured we wouldn't be having the discussion.

Also helps the AFL that Mackay isn't a big fish that they don't want to rub out for any period of time.
tigerpie
Coach
Posts: 5098
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2011 1:30 pm
Team: Glenelg
Team: Collingwood
Has thanked: 651 times
Been thanked: 529 times
Contact:

Re: AFL Round 13

Post by tigerpie »

Zelezny Chucks wrote:
FlyingHigh wrote:To stick up for the AFL (which usually I don't do) we're all saying "this is where the AFL is heading" etc etc, but perhaps they don't particularly like or want it to be how the game looks or is played, but their hands are being forced, unlike some of the other silly rules they have brought in.


That argument would hold water if they were as hot on dirty hits behind the play or stamping out the kind of acts that Mumford got away with on the weekend - twice I might add. Until they separate intent and result they will continue to happen.

First thing judged in any incident should be was it an act you could expect on the footy field during a normal contest. If the answer is no then it should be instantly 2 weeks and go from there with severity of outcome. This BS of people getting off because the contact was insufficient when trying to elbow someone in the head is a joke.

Mackay is effectively being punished because he was better at protecting himself than Clark, if he ran in face first and they both got injured we wouldn't be having the discussion.

Also helps the AFL that Mackay isn't a big fish that they don't want to rub out for any period of time.

At 32, if he gets games, and the crows win a couple and he can't get back in its potentially career done.
So even though he's a small fish in the pond, his outcome could be retirement.
Career potentially over.
Senor Moto Gadili
Veteran
Posts: 3645
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 4:22 pm
Team: North Adelaide
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Has thanked: 206 times
Been thanked: 540 times
Contact:

Re: AFL Round 13

Post by Senor Moto Gadili »

NOT GUILTY
mighty_tiger_79
Coach
Posts: 62502
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:59 pm
Team: Geelong
Location: at the TAB
Has thanked: 14201 times
Been thanked: 5170 times
Contact:

Re: AFL Round 13

Post by mighty_tiger_79 »

Senor Moto Gadili wrote:NOT GUILTY
Praise be.

Sent from my SM-G781B using Tapatalk
Matty Wade is a star and deserves more respect from the forum family!
mighty_tiger_79
Coach
Posts: 62502
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:59 pm
Team: Geelong
Location: at the TAB
Has thanked: 14201 times
Been thanked: 5170 times
Contact:

Re: AFL Round 13

Post by mighty_tiger_79 »

Booney will be devastated

Sent from my SM-G781B using Tapatalk
Matty Wade is a star and deserves more respect from the forum family!
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], gadj1976 and 225 guests