by Wedgie » Tue May 18, 2021 1:25 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by The Bedge » Tue May 18, 2021 1:26 pm
Wedgie wrote:Geezus and I thought I was grumpy, I get shrapnel thrown at me all the time, I thank them and put it in the kids cancer donation box.
Must admit a guy asked me to take out enough for a drink for myself on Sunday from his card but I turned him down politely. I feel scummy taking tips but appreciate them and make sure I thank them.
I prefer something nice said but I'm probably in the unique position of having a higher income than most of my customers.
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by Wedgie » Tue May 18, 2021 1:46 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Dutchy » Thu May 20, 2021 5:34 pm
by Wedgie » Sat May 22, 2021 12:21 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Wedgie » Sat May 22, 2021 12:27 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Lightning McQueen » Mon May 24, 2021 3:09 pm
by MW » Mon May 24, 2021 4:39 pm
by Booney » Mon May 24, 2021 4:47 pm
MW wrote:People thinking even though the 'deliberate' out of bounds by Murray was proven to be touched by Spargo, it still should have been called deliberate
by RB » Mon May 24, 2021 5:17 pm
The rule (Law 18.10.2) is that a FK is to be paid against a player who 'kicks, handballs or forces the football over the boundary line and does not demonstrate sufficient intent to keep the football in play'.MW wrote:People thinking even though the 'deliberate' out of bounds by Murray was proven to be touched by Spargo, it still should have been called deliberate [emoji38] [emoji38]
by am Bays » Mon May 24, 2021 5:46 pm
RB wrote:The rule (Law 18.10.2) is that a FK is to be paid against a player who 'kicks, handballs or forces the football over the boundary line and does not demonstrate sufficient intent to keep the football in play'.MW wrote:People thinking even though the 'deliberate' out of bounds by Murray was proven to be touched by Spargo, it still should have been called deliberate [emoji38] [emoji38]
It doesn't say anything about touching an opponent on the way over.
In this case I don't think there was 'sufficient intent' so correct call would be FK to Melbourne.
I note also that the 'spirit and intention' (Law 18.10.1) of this rule is that 'players shall be encouraged to keep the ball in play'.
To me, this means that a deflection is irrelevant where it's clear that the player didn't demonstrate 'sufficient intent'.
by Booney » Mon May 24, 2021 6:30 pm
by mighty_tiger_79 » Mon May 24, 2021 6:35 pm
by Brodlach » Mon May 24, 2021 6:49 pm
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by MW » Mon May 24, 2021 7:04 pm
by amber_fluid » Mon May 24, 2021 7:36 pm
MW wrote:Turn it up if you think a deflection off the opposition doesn't cancel it out laughable to suggest otherwise.
May as well give out on the fulls even if touched, and goals now count if touched
by MW » Mon May 24, 2021 7:42 pm
by Brodlach » Mon May 24, 2021 7:45 pm
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by MW » Mon May 24, 2021 7:46 pm
Brodlach wrote:Some of you blokes must be pissed,if someone kicks the ball 50 meters close to the line and it’s about to go OOF but someone touches it it should be called deliberate?
by mighty_tiger_79 » Mon May 24, 2021 7:47 pm
NopeMW wrote:The rule states that player forces it over the line. Surely for that player to put it over the line they need to last touch it!
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |