Negative defensive footy cure?

All discussions to do with the SANFL
User avatar
Apachebulldog
League - Best 21
Posts: 2387
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 2:05 pm
Team: Central District
Location: On the prairie
Has thanked: 381 times
Been thanked: 115 times

Re: Negative defensive footy cure?

Post by Apachebulldog »

Hey Gazza good to come up with a different approach but i am not convinced.


I reckon i have seen a post or heard some one regarding overhauling the whole scoring system.


If the ball goes thru between both goal posts its a goal. still 6 points

if the ball hits the goal post and goes past in between both goal posts or is touched by a player its a goal. still 6 points

If the ball hits the goal post or the point post and the ball goes past in between goal post and point post its a point.

If the ball hits the goal post or the the point post and the ball bounces back into play its play on just like the world game.

This would also get rid of the controversial video replay adjudication.


Another option i thought re the scoring

If the ball hits the goal post or the ball is touched by a player and goes in between both goal posts then its 3 points.

Thus still retaining the Video Review Replay making it more controversial and exciting maybe.
SANFL 2000 - 2011 Central District 12 consecutive Grand Final appearances and 9 Premierships.

WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOFFFFFFFFFF.

Hit em hard let them get up and hit em again.
woodublieve12
Coach
Posts: 17954
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 5:48 pm
Team: Glenelg
Team: Sydney Swans
Has thanked: 3236 times
Been thanked: 2578 times
Contact:

Re: Negative defensive footy cure?

Post by woodublieve12 »

Sick of this attitude that defensive/pressure footy is a bad thing. Defence wins premierships...
I would rather watch an enthralling contest than a one sided goal fest.

I strongly believe the true measure of a side is 1. How they handle the pressure and 2. How well they can shut down sides and apply as much pressure as possible on the opposing side for long periods of time.

Ball movement and goals will follow if you can achieve that
"Be curious, not judgmental""
User avatar
JK
Coach
Posts: 37469
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:11 am
Team: Norwood
Team: SMOSH West Lakes
Location: Coopers Hill
Has thanked: 4509 times
Been thanked: 3028 times
Contact:

Re: Negative defensive footy cure?

Post by JK »

gazzamagoo wrote:
amber_fluid wrote:
gazzamagoo wrote:
Booney wrote:My first thought is, how early did Gaz start drinking?

When I was about 11 I think.


Late start for a central supporter

Sorry, I was in jail :D


Outstanding :lol:
FUSC
Bum Crack
Coach
Posts: 8006
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 4:20 pm
Team: Geelong
Team: Berri
Location: Here
Has thanked: 329 times
Been thanked: 923 times
Contact:

Re: Negative defensive footy cure?

Post by Bum Crack »

woodublieve12 wrote:Sick of this attitude that defensive/pressure footy is a bad thing. Defence wins premierships...
I would rather watch an enthralling contest than a one sided goal fest.

I strongly believe the true measure of a side is 1. How they handle the pressure and 2. How well they can shut down sides and apply as much pressure as possible on the opposing side for long periods of time.

Ball movement and goals will follow if you can achieve that

I don't think you'd be saying that if you weren't a Sydney supporter. Possibly the most boring team to watch bar none I reckon.
So you've seen everything have you?
Yep
Have you ever seen a man eat his own head?
No
Well you haven't seen everything then have you.
woodublieve12
Coach
Posts: 17954
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 5:48 pm
Team: Glenelg
Team: Sydney Swans
Has thanked: 3236 times
Been thanked: 2578 times
Contact:

Re: Negative defensive footy cure?

Post by woodublieve12 »

Bum Crack wrote:
woodublieve12 wrote:Sick of this attitude that defensive/pressure footy is a bad thing. Defence wins premierships...
I would rather watch an enthralling contest than a one sided goal fest.

I strongly believe the true measure of a side is 1. How they handle the pressure and 2. How well they can shut down sides and apply as much pressure as possible on the opposing side for long periods of time.

Ball movement and goals will follow if you can achieve that

I don't think you'd be saying that if you weren't a Sydney supporter. Possibly the most boring team to watch bar none I reckon.


Yeah and they have played more finals than most.

Also just about every side who has won a flag over the past 20 years have been the best defensive side... and on sydney, i couldn't care less how they win and any side i coached as long as they won... winning is winning and if your bored by that i couldn't give rats

And don't assume what i think...
"Be curious, not judgmental""
Bum Crack
Coach
Posts: 8006
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 4:20 pm
Team: Geelong
Team: Berri
Location: Here
Has thanked: 329 times
Been thanked: 923 times
Contact:

Re: Negative defensive footy cure?

Post by Bum Crack »

woodublieve12 wrote:
Bum Crack wrote:
woodublieve12 wrote:Sick of this attitude that defensive/pressure footy is a bad thing. Defence wins premierships...
I would rather watch an enthralling contest than a one sided goal fest.

I strongly believe the true measure of a side is 1. How they handle the pressure and 2. How well they can shut down sides and apply as much pressure as possible on the opposing side for long periods of time.

Ball movement and goals will follow if you can achieve that

I don't think you'd be saying that if you weren't a Sydney supporter. Possibly the most boring team to watch bar none I reckon.


Yeah and they have played more finals than most.

Also just about every side who has won a flag over the past 20 years have been the best defensive side... and on sydney, i couldn't care less how they win and any side i coached as long as they won... winning is winning and if your bored by that i couldn't give rats

And don't assume what i think...

I thought the team that kicks the most goals wins???
So you've seen everything have you?
Yep
Have you ever seen a man eat his own head?
No
Well you haven't seen everything then have you.
woodublieve12
Coach
Posts: 17954
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 5:48 pm
Team: Glenelg
Team: Sydney Swans
Has thanked: 3236 times
Been thanked: 2578 times
Contact:

Re: Negative defensive footy cure?

Post by woodublieve12 »

Bum Crack wrote:
woodublieve12 wrote:
Bum Crack wrote:
woodublieve12 wrote:Sick of this attitude that defensive/pressure footy is a bad thing. Defence wins premierships...
I would rather watch an enthralling contest than a one sided goal fest.

I strongly believe the true measure of a side is 1. How they handle the pressure and 2. How well they can shut down sides and apply as much pressure as possible on the opposing side for long periods of time.

Ball movement and goals will follow if you can achieve that

I don't think you'd be saying that if you weren't a Sydney supporter. Possibly the most boring team to watch bar none I reckon.


Yeah and they have played more finals than most.

Also just about every side who has won a flag over the past 20 years have been the best defensive side... and on sydney, i couldn't care less how they win and any side i coached as long as they won... winning is winning and if your bored by that i couldn't give rats

And don't assume what i think...

I thought the team that kicks the most goals wins???

it is... but you also have to stop the other side. So if i win 2 goals to 1... It's a win and i'll take it
"Be curious, not judgmental""
gazzamagoo

Re: Negative defensive footy cure?

Post by gazzamagoo »

woodublieve12 wrote:Sick of this attitude that defensive/pressure footy is a bad thing. Defence wins premierships...
I would rather watch an enthralling contest than a one sided goal fest.

I strongly believe the true measure of a side is 1. How they handle the pressure and 2. How well they can shut down sides and apply as much pressure as possible on the opposing side for long periods of time.

Ball movement and goals will follow if you can achieve that

Well sunshine, it ain't working & that's my point!
The game has become a tedious defensive roving scrum with low scores,
BORING.
Bum Crack
Coach
Posts: 8006
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 4:20 pm
Team: Geelong
Team: Berri
Location: Here
Has thanked: 329 times
Been thanked: 923 times
Contact:

Re: Negative defensive footy cure?

Post by Bum Crack »

gazzamagoo wrote:
woodublieve12 wrote:Sick of this attitude that defensive/pressure footy is a bad thing. Defence wins premierships...
I would rather watch an enthralling contest than a one sided goal fest.

I strongly believe the true measure of a side is 1. How they handle the pressure and 2. How well they can shut down sides and apply as much pressure as possible on the opposing side for long periods of time.

Ball movement and goals will follow if you can achieve that

Well sunshine, it ain't working & that's my point!
The game has become a tedious defensive roving scrum with low scores,
BORING
.

Not if you're a Sydney supporter. Which is the point I was getting at.
So you've seen everything have you?
Yep
Have you ever seen a man eat his own head?
No
Well you haven't seen everything then have you.
woodublieve12
Coach
Posts: 17954
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 5:48 pm
Team: Glenelg
Team: Sydney Swans
Has thanked: 3236 times
Been thanked: 2578 times
Contact:

Re: Negative defensive footy cure?

Post by woodublieve12 »

Bum Crack wrote:
gazzamagoo wrote:
woodublieve12 wrote:Sick of this attitude that defensive/pressure footy is a bad thing. Defence wins premierships...
I would rather watch an enthralling contest than a one sided goal fest.

I strongly believe the true measure of a side is 1. How they handle the pressure and 2. How well they can shut down sides and apply as much pressure as possible on the opposing side for long periods of time.

Ball movement and goals will follow if you can achieve that

Well sunshine, it ain't working & that's my point!
The game has become a tedious defensive roving scrum with low scores,
BORING
.

Not if you're a Sydney supporter. Which is the point I was getting at.


maybe if your side could defend better and didn't have too many blokes who wanted to get their hands dirty you wouldn't have lost last week...
"Be curious, not judgmental""
Bum Crack
Coach
Posts: 8006
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 4:20 pm
Team: Geelong
Team: Berri
Location: Here
Has thanked: 329 times
Been thanked: 923 times
Contact:

Re: Negative defensive footy cure?

Post by Bum Crack »

woodublieve12 wrote:
Bum Crack wrote:
gazzamagoo wrote:
woodublieve12 wrote:Sick of this attitude that defensive/pressure footy is a bad thing. Defence wins premierships...
I would rather watch an enthralling contest than a one sided goal fest.

I strongly believe the true measure of a side is 1. How they handle the pressure and 2. How well they can shut down sides and apply as much pressure as possible on the opposing side for long periods of time.

Ball movement and goals will follow if you can achieve that

Well sunshine, it ain't working & that's my point!
The game has become a tedious defensive roving scrum with low scores,
BORING
.

Not if you're a Sydney supporter. Which is the point I was getting at.


maybe if your side could defend better and didn't have too many blokes who wanted to get their hands dirty you wouldn't have lost last week...

We defend ok mate. Don't you worry about us too much. We're going ok
So you've seen everything have you?
Yep
Have you ever seen a man eat his own head?
No
Well you haven't seen everything then have you.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 265 guests