The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

All discussions to do with the SANFL
Post Reply
User avatar
Jimmy_041
Coach
Posts: 15660
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 6:00 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Collingwood
Team: Port District
Has thanked: 897 times
Been thanked: 1407 times
Contact:

Re: reserves

Post by Jimmy_041 »

This doesn't seem to fit in with another event.
Call me cynical (because I am) but I think the recent reduction in TPPS / APPS was to stem the flow of SANFL players to the Adelaide FL / country leagues.
There are plenty of cashed up clubs having not paid players this year
There's going to be a huge transfer if they bin the Reserves
dedja: Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
mighty_tiger_79
Coach
Posts: 62502
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:59 pm
Team: Geelong
Location: at the TAB
Has thanked: 14199 times
Been thanked: 5169 times
Contact:

Re: reserves

Post by mighty_tiger_79 »

I heard that the AFL reserves in the SANFL are goneski. And will revert back to players being distributed to other SANFL clubs.

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk
Matty Wade is a star and deserves more respect from the forum family!
Jim05
Coach
Posts: 49466
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 8:33 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Essendon
Team: South Gawler
Has thanked: 1136 times
Been thanked: 4041 times
Contact:

Re: reserves

Post by Jim05 »

mighty_tiger_79 wrote:I heard that the AFL reserves in the SANFL are goneski. And will revert back to players being distributed to other SANFL clubs.

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk
Have also heard that
User avatar
RB
Coach
Posts: 6639
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 3:15 pm
Has thanked: 931 times
Been thanked: 1392 times
Contact:

Re: reserves

Post by RB »

mighty_tiger_79 wrote:I heard that the AFL reserves in the SANFL are goneski. And will revert back to players being distributed to other SANFL clubs.

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk
Here's hoping.
R.I.P. the SANFL 1877 - 2013
User avatar
Armchair expert
Coach
Posts: 13550
Joined: Tue May 15, 2018 8:48 am
Team: Glenelg
Team: Ports
Has thanked: 432 times
Been thanked: 2002 times
Contact:

Re: reserves

Post by Armchair expert »

WE WANT AFL IN SANFL

sing it loud and clear
dammit pantera this beer is warm
mighty_tiger_79
Coach
Posts: 62502
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:59 pm
Team: Geelong
Location: at the TAB
Has thanked: 14199 times
Been thanked: 5169 times
Contact:

Re: reserves

Post by mighty_tiger_79 »

Armchair expert wrote:WE WANT AFL IN SANFL

sing it loud and clear
Blasphemous

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk
Matty Wade is a star and deserves more respect from the forum family!
Dogs64
Under 18s
Posts: 612
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2018 9:41 am
Team: Central District
Has thanked: 435 times
Been thanked: 266 times
Contact:

Re: reserves

Post by Dogs64 »

mighty_tiger_79 wrote:I heard that the AFL reserves in the SANFL are goneski. And will revert back to players being distributed to other SANFL clubs.

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

Thought theyve said Goddens their reserves coach?
User avatar
Jimmy_041
Coach
Posts: 15660
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 6:00 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Collingwood
Team: Port District
Has thanked: 897 times
Been thanked: 1407 times
Contact:

Re: reserves

Post by Jimmy_041 »

mighty_tiger_79 wrote:I heard that the AFL reserves in the SANFL are goneski. And will revert back to players being distributed to other SANFL clubs.

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk


My mail is they're back next year
dedja: Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
Eagles2014
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4128
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2014 1:26 pm
Has thanked: 199 times
Been thanked: 627 times
Contact:

Re: reserves

Post by Eagles2014 »

Jim05 wrote:
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:I heard that the AFL reserves in the SANFL are goneski. And will revert back to players being distributed to other SANFL clubs.

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk
Have also heard that


Lots of talk re no AFL teams in comp next year, but then both teams making lots of announcements suggesting otherwise, like Godden to coach Crows team and Port wanting Sutcliffe to play in their team, so fairly interesting how it will all play out!
mighty_tiger_79
Coach
Posts: 62502
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:59 pm
Team: Geelong
Location: at the TAB
Has thanked: 14199 times
Been thanked: 5169 times
Contact:

Re: reserves

Post by mighty_tiger_79 »

Its a fascinating situation....

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk
Matty Wade is a star and deserves more respect from the forum family!
User avatar
Groucho
Under 18s
Posts: 731
Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 12:34 am
Team: Central District
Team: Adelaide Crows
Location: Hope Valley
Has thanked: 106 times
Been thanked: 160 times
Contact:

Re: reserves

Post by Groucho »

No. It's giving me the 5h1ts, I want them both gone! :evil:
Jackal1
Mini-League
Posts: 43
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2020 4:40 pm
Team: Eagles
Been thanked: 17 times
Contact:

Re: reserves

Post by Jackal1 »

At this stage the AFL clubs are 100% in the league competition (unfortunately). It will depend on how Covid shapes AFL next year - they may not be able to play in our league again next year.
But the SANFL clubs are now holding the whip hand and believe that the original arrangements made were way too favourable towards the AFL clubs.
The clubs have given the SANFL some non negotiables including... no marquee players and top up players to receive a flat payment of $200.00 per game.
User avatar
RB
Coach
Posts: 6639
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 3:15 pm
Has thanked: 931 times
Been thanked: 1392 times
Contact:

Re: reserves

Post by RB »

As an aside, does anyone know if the AFL has given any indication as to list sizes next year?
R.I.P. the SANFL 1877 - 2013
User avatar
Thiele
Coach
Posts: 28411
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 12:37 pm
Team: West Adelaide
Team: Adelaide Crows
Location: The wolf packs den
Has thanked: 186 times
Been thanked: 125 times
Contact:

Re: reserves

Post by Thiele »

RB wrote:As an aside, does anyone know if the AFL has given any indication as to list sizes next year?
No they haven't
James Ezard Joint 2009 Magarey Medalist

Personal views only not views of the West Adelaide Footy Club or Bedford Indstries
mighty_tiger_79
Coach
Posts: 62502
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:59 pm
Team: Geelong
Location: at the TAB
Has thanked: 14199 times
Been thanked: 5169 times
Contact:

Re: reserves

Post by mighty_tiger_79 »

42 + 2 cat B rookies is the most common I've heard

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk
Matty Wade is a star and deserves more respect from the forum family!
User avatar
Aerie
Coach
Posts: 5826
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 1:35 am
Team: Eagles
Has thanked: 199 times
Been thanked: 610 times
Contact:

Re: reserves

Post by Aerie »

The SANFL competition is so much better without the AFL Reserves.

If they do come back:

- Port should pay the same as the Crows.
- That amount should be increased as there were no extra crowds or extra effort by the Crows or Port to promote the competition.
- No marquee players.
User avatar
Groucho
Under 18s
Posts: 731
Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 12:34 am
Team: Central District
Team: Adelaide Crows
Location: Hope Valley
Has thanked: 106 times
Been thanked: 160 times
Contact:

Re: reserves

Post by Groucho »

NO AFL IN THE S.A.N.F.L. :evil: :twisted:
User avatar
goddy11
League Bench Warmer
Posts: 1368
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2014 5:05 pm
Team: Eagles
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Myponga-Sellicks
Has thanked: 677 times
Been thanked: 221 times
Contact:

Re: reserves

Post by goddy11 »

Aerie wrote:The SANFL competition is so much better without the AFL Reserves.

If they do come back:

- Port should pay the same as the Crows.
- That amount should be increased as there were no extra crowds or extra effort by the Crows or Port to promote the competition.
- No marquee players.

Agree with all of the.
Your 3rd point regarding marquis players. How did that happen. The AFL sides were strong enough and somehow someone at the SANFL decided they need strengthening. PA need to pay as they are no longer a SANFL side. They just can't come into the comp and go at will. I would suggest that they play for no points as well.
User avatar
ferret
Reserves
Posts: 913
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 2:46 pm
Team: Eagles
Team: Adelaide Crows
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 144 times

Re: reserves

Post by ferret »

Jackal1 wrote:At this stage the AFL clubs are 100% in the league competition (unfortunately). It will depend on how Covid shapes AFL next year - they may not be able to play in our league again next year.
But the SANFL clubs are now holding the whip hand and believe that the original arrangements made were way too favourable towards the AFL clubs.
The clubs have given the SANFL some non negotiables including... no marquee players and top up players to receive a flat payment of $200.00 per game.


Here we go again.....the power delists Cam Sutcliffe but wants him to continue playing in their SANFL side. I reckon they will be under handed (again) and offer some sought of inducement which the SANFL sides can't match.
He's already been a marqee player once.
Jim05
Coach
Posts: 49466
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 8:33 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Essendon
Team: South Gawler
Has thanked: 1136 times
Been thanked: 4041 times
Contact:

Re: reserves

Post by Jim05 »

ferret wrote:
Jackal1 wrote:At this stage the AFL clubs are 100% in the league competition (unfortunately). It will depend on how Covid shapes AFL next year - they may not be able to play in our league again next year.
But the SANFL clubs are now holding the whip hand and believe that the original arrangements made were way too favourable towards the AFL clubs.
The clubs have given the SANFL some non negotiables including... no marquee players and top up players to receive a flat payment of $200.00 per game.


Here we go again.....the power delists Cam Sutcliffe but wants him to continue playing in their SANFL side. I reckon they will be under handed (again) and offer some sought of inducement which the SANFL sides can't match.
He's already been a marqee player once.
Yep.
Scrap the marquee player completely and make it that no one who has been on a AFL list previously is eligible to play.

I still don’t believe the AFL reserves are a fait accompli and that the SANFL has a number of proposals to run the rule over
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 266 guests