Spargo wrote:am Bays wrote:Will take that
TBH North based on the last probably deserved the win as they were attacking the footy more where as we were just trying to hang on.
2 valuable points that keeps the Back to Back dream alive
Barring 13 mins of play in the last qtr we were
clearly the better side all day.
Harder at it, ran in numbers, played the percentages.
To dig in for those last 8-9 minutes with injured players on the field shows the hunger is still there.
Not bad for a team “going backwards”...
Have to agree with Spargo here, I thought the Bays were definitely the better side, apart from the first 17 minutes (when North got within a goal) of the last term. They really came to play yesterday, and applied lots of pressure which never really allowed us to execute our usually sharp skills (I lost count of how many times we panic-kicked to a Glenelg player), and displayed plenty of grit in the last part of the last to hang on when North had had all the momentum. I'm glad that North found an extra gear in the last and made a game of it, but it shouldn't have taken that long - you can't give sides a 5 goal start in a low scoring match and hope to win.
Naturally I'm disappointed to lose, but it was to a strong side who will feature come finals time, and we still retain second spot and a two game buffer over South. Having won five on the trot, I'm hoping a loss will provide an opportunity to examine some of our deficiencies in handling Glenelg's pressure. This week's clash with the Eagles promises to be very interesting, expecting Barns (finally!) and Clisby to return - I didn't think we picked up any injuries, so perhaps there'll be some tough calls at selection on Thursday.
Finally, a fantastic crowd and a great atmosphere made for a top day at the footy (even if it was a Sunday).