by Spargo » Fri Jul 31, 2020 10:49 pm
by Jim05 » Fri Jul 31, 2020 10:54 pm
Every Essendon fan knows the score. Soft draw to start the season and badly undermanned. Even the most optimistic fans have us winning maybe 2-3 more tops.Spargo wrote:Essendon 5 & 2 going in to tonight - very deceiving
Fell in against non finalists Freo 6 pts, Syd 6 pts, Adel 3 pts, struggled to beat North by 14 pts
Lost to Carlton, have been touched up by the Dogs & now Bris.
Only decent win was Coll by 15 pts.
Still have GWS, StK, Rich, WC, Geel & Port to come - currently won’t get close to any of them
50/50 games with GC, Haw & Melb
by LMA » Fri Jul 31, 2020 11:55 pm
DOC wrote:How much is a ticket for the NM v M game?
by LMA » Sat Aug 01, 2020 12:00 am
Jim05 wrote:Every Essendon fan knows the score. Soft draw to start the season and badly undermanned. Even the most optimistic fans have us winning maybe 2-3 more tops.Spargo wrote:Essendon 5 & 2 going in to tonight - very deceiving
Fell in against non finalists Freo 6 pts, Syd 6 pts, Adel 3 pts, struggled to beat North by 14 pts
Lost to Carlton, have been touched up by the Dogs & now Bris.
Only decent win was Coll by 15 pts.
Still have GWS, StK, Rich, WC, Geel & Port to come - currently won’t get close to any of them
50/50 games with GC, Haw & Melb
I don’t know any Bomber fans that at the start of the season had us in the top 8, most thought 10th-14th is about it
by Jim05 » Sat Aug 01, 2020 12:03 am
The proof is in the pudding.LMA wrote:Jim05 wrote:Every Essendon fan knows the score. Soft draw to start the season and badly undermanned. Even the most optimistic fans have us winning maybe 2-3 more tops.Spargo wrote:Essendon 5 & 2 going in to tonight - very deceiving
Fell in against non finalists Freo 6 pts, Syd 6 pts, Adel 3 pts, struggled to beat North by 14 pts
Lost to Carlton, have been touched up by the Dogs & now Bris.
Only decent win was Coll by 15 pts.
Still have GWS, StK, Rich, WC, Geel & Port to come - currently won’t get close to any of them
50/50 games with GC, Haw & Melb
I don’t know any Bomber fans that at the start of the season had us in the top 8, most thought 10th-14th is about it
To be fair to the optimistic Bomber fans though, you could have a spine of Andrews, Moore, Cripps, Cameron & Kennedy and still not rate them.
by DOC » Sun Aug 02, 2020 10:19 am
by Jim05 » Sun Aug 02, 2020 10:20 am
by locky801 » Sun Aug 02, 2020 10:49 am
Jim05 wrote:So is Buckley on the next plane home or Ed full of shit once again
by Corona Man » Sun Aug 02, 2020 8:48 pm
by Bum Crack » Sun Aug 02, 2020 8:57 pm
by MW » Mon Aug 03, 2020 8:50 am
by Jim05 » Mon Aug 03, 2020 9:06 am
Mitch Cleary is employed directly by the AFL I believe so you would think his obligations to the AFL should override any obligations he has a journalist.MW wrote:Can someone explain the grounds for dismissal (or standing down indef) on Mitch Cleary with the AFL after he shared the Cotchin missus insta post of her breaching covid rules? I don't get it...
by MW » Mon Aug 03, 2020 9:10 am
by Booney » Mon Aug 03, 2020 9:10 am
Jim05 wrote:Mitch Cleary is employed directly by the AFL I believe so you would think his obligations to the AFL should override any obligations he has a journalist.MW wrote:Can someone explain the grounds for dismissal (or standing down indef) on Mitch Cleary with the AFL after he shared the Cotchin missus insta post of her breaching covid rules? I don't get it...
Bizarre decision either way
by Booney » Mon Aug 03, 2020 9:11 am
MW wrote:That's the bit I dont get.
so his obligation to the AFL is to keep it a secret and not repost what she did?
by MW » Mon Aug 03, 2020 9:13 am
by Jim05 » Mon Aug 03, 2020 9:22 am
I’m not saying I agree with it but that would be the logic the AFL would be applying.Booney wrote:Jim05 wrote:Mitch Cleary is employed directly by the AFL I believe so you would think his obligations to the AFL should override any obligations he has a journalist.MW wrote:Can someone explain the grounds for dismissal (or standing down indef) on Mitch Cleary with the AFL after he shared the Cotchin missus insta post of her breaching covid rules? I don't get it...
Bizarre decision either way
Codswallop! His job as a journalist is to report on football news, not to drive AFL propaganda, that's rubbish Jim and his sacking has the finger prints of a dictator all over it.
by Booney » Mon Aug 03, 2020 9:27 am
by MW » Mon Aug 03, 2020 9:41 am
Booney wrote:Immediately anything written on the AFL.com site now has zero credibility. I feel for the journo's who are left, hardly worth them putting in.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |