Bum Crack wrote:I think this is the first time I have ever seen you sort of admit you were incorrect
I wasn't incorrect, i just accidentally left out a word the first time
Bum Crack wrote:I think this is the first time I have ever seen you sort of admit you were incorrect
daysofourlives wrote:RB wrote:How is reporting the news scaremongering?
I agree it's not much of a story but I don't know how the news story I just watched could be interpreted as trying to induce fear.
Seriously? Just take a step back and think what it is reporting as its headline.
A person may or may not have caught a cold. Its not news, its speculating. How bout we just report facts in the news.
Now you do all realize when a person tests positive for a 2nd, 3rd or 4th time it is counted as another case of covid? They dont report that, that doesnt suit their narrative.
tigerpie wrote:daysofourlives wrote:RB wrote:How is reporting the news scaremongering?
I agree it's not much of a story but I don't know how the news story I just watched could be interpreted as trying to induce fear.
Seriously? Just take a step back and think what it is reporting as its headline.
A person may or may not have caught a cold. Its not news, its speculating. How bout we just report facts in the news.
Now you do all realize when a person tests positive for a 2nd, 3rd or 4th time it is counted as another case of covid? They dont report that, that doesnt suit their narrative.
What ****ing narrative?
What purpose does fudging stats serve?
Whats the motivation. Do you think the government want us all cooped up?
Its a new case ffs so stats need to reflect that.
Seriously, I just think you are an attention seeking millennial trying to be relevant in today's world.
Booney wrote:tigerpie wrote:daysofourlives wrote:RB wrote:How is reporting the news scaremongering?
I agree it's not much of a story but I don't know how the news story I just watched could be interpreted as trying to induce fear.
Seriously? Just take a step back and think what it is reporting as its headline.
A person may or may not have caught a cold. Its not news, its speculating. How bout we just report facts in the news.
Now you do all realize when a person tests positive for a 2nd, 3rd or 4th time it is counted as another case of covid? They dont report that, that doesnt suit their narrative.
What ****ing narrative?
What purpose does fudging stats serve?
Whats the motivation. Do you think the government want us all cooped up?
Its a new case ffs so stats need to reflect that.
Seriously, I just think you are an attention seeking millennial trying to be relevant in today's world.
No mate, he's a cranky boomer.
Booney wrote:tigerpie wrote:daysofourlives wrote:RB wrote:How is reporting the news scaremongering?
I agree it's not much of a story but I don't know how the news story I just watched could be interpreted as trying to induce fear.
Seriously? Just take a step back and think what it is reporting as its headline.
A person may or may not have caught a cold. Its not news, its speculating. How bout we just report facts in the news.
Now you do all realize when a person tests positive for a 2nd, 3rd or 4th time it is counted as another case of covid? They dont report that, that doesnt suit their narrative.
What ****ing narrative?
What purpose does fudging stats serve?
Whats the motivation. Do you think the government want us all cooped up?
Its a new case ffs so stats need to reflect that.
Seriously, I just think you are an attention seeking millennial trying to be relevant in today's world.
No mate, he's a cranky boomer.
daysofourlives wrote:Booney wrote:tigerpie wrote:daysofourlives wrote:[quote="RB"]How is reporting the news scaremongering?
I agree it's not much of a story but I don't know how the news story I just watched could be interpreted as trying to induce fear.
Seriously? Just take a step back and think what it is reporting as its headline.
A person may or may not have caught a cold. Its not news, its speculating. How bout we just report facts in the news.
Now you do all realize when a person tests positive for a 2nd, 3rd or 4th time it is counted as another case of covid? They dont report that, that doesnt suit their narrative.
What ****ing narrative?
What purpose does fudging stats serve?
Whats the motivation. Do you think the government want us all cooped up?
Its a new case ffs so stats need to reflect that.
Seriously, I just think you are an attention seeking millennial trying to be relevant in today's world.
No mate, he's a cranky boomer.
stan wrote:[Well actually the purpose that it does serve on some areas are purely politics. NY is a good example of this with pressure being out to assign as many deaths to C19 as possibly to push the figures to show the US government's handling of the C19 in as poor as light as possible.
Other than pure politics and political agenda, that's as much as I have.
Couple of US sources, of course they state talking to a handful of medical professionals in regards to his issue and the pressure about this. All comes down to politics, Blue v Red, always does.Q. wrote:stan wrote:[Well actually the purpose that it does serve on some areas are purely politics. NY is a good example of this with pressure being out to assign as many deaths to C19 as possibly to push the figures to show the US government's handling of the C19 in as poor as light as possible.
Other than pure politics and political agenda, that's as much as I have.
Extraordinary claim. Where is the evidence for this?
Jim05 wrote:363 in Victoria today, 4 deaths.
Face masks compulsory in Melbourne and Mitchell Shire from midnight Wednesday. $200 fines for non compliance
daysofourlives wrote:Jim05 wrote:363 in Victoria today, 4 deaths.
Face masks compulsory in Melbourne and Mitchell Shire from midnight Wednesday. $200 fines for non compliance
So its so contagious you need a mask to stop the spread but to test for it they need to stick a swab up your nose nearly to your brain?
Something doesnt add up there.
Psyber wrote:daysofourlives wrote:Jim05 wrote:363 in Victoria today, 4 deaths.
Face masks compulsory in Melbourne and Mitchell Shire from midnight Wednesday. $200 fines for non compliance
So its so contagious you need a mask to stop the spread but to test for it they need to stick a swab up your nose nearly to your brain?
Something doesnt add up there.
Sterile swab held in gloves by a person wearing a mask, gloves, and gown. Once it has been up your nose it goes into a sterile tube that seals, and is opened at the lab by someone similarly protected.
daysofourlives wrote:Psyber wrote:daysofourlives wrote:Jim05 wrote:363 in Victoria today, 4 deaths.
Face masks compulsory in Melbourne and Mitchell Shire from midnight Wednesday. $200 fines for non compliance
So its so contagious you need a mask to stop the spread but to test for it they need to stick a swab up your nose nearly to your brain?
Something doesnt add up there.
Sterile swab held in gloves by a person wearing a mask, gloves, and gown. Once it has been up your nose it goes into a sterile tube that seals, and is opened at the lab by someone similarly protected.
yes but why does it have to go so far up your nose? If its so contagious why not just a swab of the mouth?
daysofourlives wrote:Psyber wrote:daysofourlives wrote:Jim05 wrote:363 in Victoria today, 4 deaths.
Face masks compulsory in Melbourne and Mitchell Shire from midnight Wednesday. $200 fines for non compliance
So its so contagious you need a mask to stop the spread but to test for it they need to stick a swab up your nose nearly to your brain?
Something doesnt add up there.
Sterile swab held in gloves by a person wearing a mask, gloves, and gown. Once it has been up your nose it goes into a sterile tube that seals, and is opened at the lab by someone similarly protected.
yes but why does it have to go so far up your nose? If its so contagious why not just a swab of the mouth?

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 165 guests