Booney wrote:Not surprised to see Sydney struggling last night. With Kennedy and Naismith it would have been an emotionally draining day. Feel for Naismith.
For sure, although despite getting off to a poor start I still rate the Bulldogs.
I understand perfectly, I am just astounded at the rank hypocrisy of the whole situation
Came from overseas where you may have or may not have been in close contact with someone with covid-19, two weeks quarantine. Football training in close contact with a positive covid-19 person, nah you are fine
I understand perfectly, I am just astounded at the rank hypocrisy of the whole situation
Came from overseas where you may have or may not have been in close contact with someone with covid-19, two weeks quarantine. Football training in close contact with a positive covid-19 person, nah you are fine
James Steward obviously pissed he is the sacrificial lamb
Tested negative 5 times in under two weeks leading up to his 1 positive test. Has tested negative 3 times since now so 9 tests in a few weeks and 1 comes back as a slight positive. Which test do you think is correct? Stewart has never tested positive and all players and officials have never tested positive. Conor’s housemates also negative. Players are being tested 3 times per week and yet despite all these negative tests you want them to miss 2 weeks. Stewart was identified because he was Conor’s wrestling partner and after pouring over hours of footage from training it was found he had exceeded the close contact time. Both players will miss 14 days, the club was cleaned thoroughly, players will be subjected to regular testing and life will go on.
I understand perfectly, I am just astounded at the rank hypocrisy of the whole situation
Came from overseas where you may have or may not have been in close contact with someone with covid-19, two weeks quarantine. Football training in close contact with a positive covid-19 person, nah you are fine
James Steward obviously pissed he is the sacrificial lamb
Tested negative 5 times in under two weeks leading up to his 1 positive test. Has tested negative 3 times since now so 9 tests in a few weeks and 1 comes back as a slight positive. Which test do you think is correct? Stewart has never tested positive and all players and officials have never tested positive. Conor’s housemates also negative. Players are being tested 3 times per week and yet despite all these negative tests you want them to miss 2 weeks. Stewart was identified because he was Conor’s wrestling partner and after pouring over hours of footage from training it was found he had exceeded the close contact time. Both players will miss 14 days, the club was cleaned thoroughly, players will be subjected to regular testing and life will go on.
They didn't happen to find that missing spread sheet at the same time did they?
Bulldogs 1-39 > Macrae 20+ disposals > Tim English any time goal scorer - @ $12
English kicks a goal at the 21 minute mark of last quarter.
Bulldogs 1-39 > total score under 124.5 > Papley any time GS > Naughton any time GS > Macrae 20+ disposals > Lloyd 20+ disposals >Kennedy 20+ disposals.
Was paying $270 for my $10, Kennedy finished on 19 disposals.
Exact same as mine, 5th multi in a row missed out by 1. Luckily Ladbrokes give a refund on one miss.
Could be all over in the first minute. whole multi resting on flip of a coin really. I guess most legs are like that but i like my money to ride a little bit longer than that. You know like going over 120pts and they go at 20 per quarter, i like the slow death haha
Supercoach Spring Racing Champion 2019 Spargo's Good Friday Cup Champion 2020
Jim05 wrote:Matt Crouch dropped but Tex keeps his spot
From the surface it seems like a bewildering decision to me to drop Crouch, usually a solid contributor who hasn't been near their worst player this year? Crows supporters on here who watch more closely I'd like to know what you think?