Booney wrote:I bet Richmond would have liked to have know they weren't paying Rance $800k next year before the trade period.
Apparently the club knew he was thinking about it.
Maybe they did know?
Booney wrote:I bet Richmond would have liked to have know they weren't paying Rance $800k next year before the trade period.
Jim05 wrote:MW wrote:Mr Beefy wrote:Rance to retire?
Confirmed by Richmond. Strange call at 30 but good luck to him.
Don’t all the Jovo’s have to spend a year or two spreading the word or something?
David Brent wrote:Feel a bit hollow after hearing about this earlier today. More the fact it doesn't seem right for him to be going out with just the one flag when we won two in his time at the club.
We we're a rabble when he started and he was one of the keys on and off field that started the resurgence towards the top.
If you can be the standout best player in your position for the decade across the competition then your an absolute star. That's what Rancey was, one of the best I've seen in my time at Tigerland.
Lightning McQueen wrote:David Brent wrote:Feel a bit hollow after hearing about this earlier today. More the fact it doesn't seem right for him to be going out with just the one flag when we won two in his time at the club.
We we're a rabble when he started and he was one of the keys on and off field that started the resurgence towards the top.
If you can be the standout best player in your position for the decade across the competition then your an absolute star. That's what Rancey was, one of the best I've seen in my time at Tigerland.
I'm not a tiger fan but I have the same sentiments, definitely made the game better and plenty of players would've learnt a lot from him, his ability to leave his opponent to make a contest elsewhere and win the ball was remarkable.
daysofourlives wrote:OMG who will take the 4th best forward now?
Rik E Boy wrote:daysofourlives wrote:OMG who will take the 4th best forward now?
Quality post. Better than average obviously but massively overhyped. Better than Scarlett Lethal? Please.
regards,
REB
Booney wrote:Rik E Boy wrote:daysofourlives wrote:OMG who will take the 4th best forward now?
Quality post. Better than average obviously but massively overhyped. Better than Scarlett Lethal? Please.
regards,
REB
Massively overhyped?
Oh, not in a Geelong guernsey. My bad.
Jim05 wrote:I kind of see where REB is coming from though. Rance is very good but comparisons to Scarlett are laughable.
Booney wrote:Jim05 wrote:I kind of see where REB is coming from though. Rance is very good but comparisons to Scarlett are laughable.
Comparing him to Scarlett isn't laughable, they play the same bloody position.
Is he as good as Scarlett? No, not many are. Is he as close as anyone in recent times? Absolutely he is.
Jim05 wrote:Booney wrote:Jim05 wrote:I kind of see where REB is coming from though. Rance is very good but comparisons to Scarlett are laughable.
Comparing him to Scarlett isn't laughable, they play the same bloody position.
Is he as good as Scarlett? No, not many are. Is he as close as anyone in recent times? Absolutely he is.
I meant what is laughable is guys like Matthews etc saying Rance is as good as Scarlett. No doubt he is next in line but the gulf is massive
Booney wrote:Where does McGovern sit?
Booney wrote:Jim05 wrote:Booney wrote:Jim05 wrote:I kind of see where REB is coming from though. Rance is very good but comparisons to Scarlett are laughable.
Comparing him to Scarlett isn't laughable, they play the same bloody position.
Is he as good as Scarlett? No, not many are. Is he as close as anyone in recent times? Absolutely he is.
I meant what is laughable is guys like Matthews etc saying Rance is as good as Scarlett. No doubt he is next in line but the gulf is massive
Well that's all subjective, isn't it?
Where does McGovern sit?
Jim05 wrote:I have McGovern about level with Rance currently but will go past him soon
Booney wrote:Jim05 wrote:I have McGovern about level with Rance currently but will go past him soon
I don't, McGovern never plays on anyone, Rance does.
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot] and 228 guests