Winner winner chicken dinnerRB wrote:Warner 11.
by The Dark Knight » Sun Sep 15, 2019 9:29 pm
Winner winner chicken dinnerRB wrote:Warner 11.
by Armchair expert » Sun Sep 15, 2019 9:30 pm
RB wrote:Warner 11.
by carey » Sun Sep 15, 2019 9:30 pm
by whufc » Sun Sep 15, 2019 9:30 pm
by whufc » Sun Sep 15, 2019 9:31 pm
carey wrote:Keep smiling you filthy little grub. Suck s**t
Karma bus toot toot
by FlyingHigh » Sun Sep 15, 2019 9:32 pm
The Dark Knight wrote:I thought it the length of time they were off the field? But then I found this-FlyingHigh wrote:Doesn't matter now, but I was going to ask what the rules were about how long players had to wait to bat if they didn't field, seeing Harris was off the field for so long.
https://sports.stackexchange.com/questi ... d-the-whol
by Grenville » Sun Sep 15, 2019 9:34 pm
by batmanbegins » Sun Sep 15, 2019 9:35 pm
by FlyingHigh » Sun Sep 15, 2019 9:36 pm
batmanbegins wrote:Im only young but has anyone had a worse series with the bat and not got dropped? Warner has had a mare, he will be fine when hes back here though.
by Jim05 » Sun Sep 15, 2019 9:40 pm
FlyingHigh wrote:batmanbegins wrote:Im only young but has anyone had a worse series with the bat and not got dropped? Warner has had a mare, he will be fine when hes back here though.
Greg Chappell, Darryl Cullinan?
by FlyingHigh » Sun Sep 15, 2019 9:42 pm
by The Dark Knight » Sun Sep 15, 2019 9:54 pm
For me personally, no, not at all.FlyingHigh wrote:[emoji38]
Do you think MItch Marsh would be treated with so much cynicism if it wasn't for all the chances his Shaun was also given?
by daysofourlives » Sun Sep 15, 2019 10:02 pm
by stan » Sun Sep 15, 2019 10:05 pm
by The Dark Knight » Sun Sep 15, 2019 10:10 pm
FlyingHigh wrote:The Dark Knight wrote:I thought it the length of time they were off the field? But then I found this-FlyingHigh wrote:Doesn't matter now, but I was going to ask what the rules were about how long players had to wait to bat if they didn't field, seeing Harris was off the field for so long.
https://sports.stackexchange.com/questi ... d-the-whol
Thanks DK. Didn't think it was as strict as if bowlers were off but thought it was something. If not, Arjuna and Inzamam would never have been out there,
Those rules sound reasonable, but obviously they aren't using them this series?
Coz remember the other year against South Africa in Adelaide and Du PLessis declared coz Warner was off the field for a couple overs when they were 9-for
by Armchair expert » Sun Sep 15, 2019 10:14 pm
by jackpot jim » Sun Sep 15, 2019 10:23 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Whatever slim hope we had is gone now.
by Trader » Sun Sep 15, 2019 10:53 pm
The Dark Knight wrote:FlyingHigh wrote:The Dark Knight wrote:I thought it the length of time they were off the field? But then I found this-FlyingHigh wrote:Doesn't matter now, but I was going to ask what the rules were about how long players had to wait to bat if they didn't field, seeing Harris was off the field for so long.
https://sports.stackexchange.com/questi ... d-the-whol
Thanks DK. Didn't think it was as strict as if bowlers were off but thought it was something. If not, Arjuna and Inzamam would never have been out there,
Those rules sound reasonable, but obviously they aren't using them this series?
Coz remember the other year against South Africa in Adelaide and Du PLessis declared coz Warner was off the field for a couple overs when they were 9-for
Yeah obviously not using those rules in this series and yes that was a strategic declaration from du Plessis as he knew Warner hadn't been back on the field long enough to be able to open the batting.
24.3 A player’s absence will not incur Penalty time if,
24.3.1 he/she has suffered an external blow during the match and, as a result, has justifiably left the field or is unable to take the field.
by Armchair expert » Sun Sep 15, 2019 11:36 pm
by locky801 » Sun Sep 15, 2019 11:40 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |