by Hazydog » Sun Sep 08, 2019 11:00 pm
by LMA » Sun Sep 08, 2019 11:01 pm
MW wrote:Higher salary means higher output? Please
As usual this is only an issue when they are winning
by JK » Sun Sep 08, 2019 11:07 pm
am Bays wrote:Good Game of footy we had our chances but didn’t capitalise on them
No excuse, next game is our focus
by Wedgie » Sun Sep 08, 2019 11:10 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by LMA » Sun Sep 08, 2019 11:11 pm
daysofourlives wrote:LMA wrote:Jim05 wrote:LMA wrote:Just last week on here both Port and Adelaide were accused of not trying and not wanting to win. FFS stick to one view, are they trying or are they too good.
Glenelg are still the best side by far, our Ammo boys stood up today though.
I’ve always maintained they are too good and wouldn’t care if they were forced to field a team that was beaten by 10 goals every week. They absolutely should not ever be allowed to win a flag
If Port or Adelaide can win a flag than AFL listed players is the least of the SANFL problems. They need to cap the amount payments true amateur footballers are getting to keep quality players at SANFL level. SANFL clubs also need to stop paying reserve players and reward higher payments for the league players. This will ensure that Port or Adelaide will never win a flag, not capping the amount of SANFL standard AFL players playing SANFL.
Nope the SANFL needs to lift the salary cap and if the clubs cant afford it the AFL should subsidise it. Basically double it to about 700k, and increase of about 300k or 2.4m per year. chicken feed for the AFL to ensure their franchises keep getting talent through the doors.
Either that or I like Cennals idea, all 8 clubs just agree to play their league side in the reserves and vice versa
by LMA » Sun Sep 08, 2019 11:17 pm
Wedgie wrote:Im with MW, there's no reason Adelaide United would get beaten by Manchester City. Salary is irrelevent.
There's obviously not an IQ test to become a Crows or West supporter.
by Dutchy » Sun Sep 08, 2019 11:18 pm
MW wrote:Higher salary means higher output? Please
As usual this is only an issue when they are winning
by StrayDog » Mon Sep 09, 2019 12:43 am
LMA wrote:daysofourlives wrote:LMA wrote:Jim05 wrote:I’ve always maintained they are too good and wouldn’t care if they were forced to field a team that was beaten by 10 goals every week. They absolutely should not ever be allowed to win a flag
If Port or Adelaide can win a flag than AFL listed players is the least of the SANFL problems. They need to cap the amount payments true amateur footballers are getting to keep quality players at SANFL level. SANFL clubs also need to stop paying reserve players and reward higher payments for the league players. This will ensure that Port or Adelaide will never win a flag, not capping the amount of SANFL standard AFL players playing SANFL.
Nope the SANFL needs to lift the salary cap and if the clubs cant afford it the AFL should subsidise it. Basically double it to about 700k, and increase of about 300k or 2.4m per year. chicken feed for the AFL to ensure their franchises keep getting talent through the doors.
Either that or I like Cennals idea, all 8 clubs just agree to play their league side in the reserves and vice versa
Good way of flushing $50k a year from the league down the toilet. Knowing that Centrals and South voted no are they accepting the money from the SANFL?
by therisingblues » Mon Sep 09, 2019 12:50 am
by StrayDog » Mon Sep 09, 2019 12:53 am
therisingblues wrote:I dunno Stray dog.
Those 2 are capable of posting decent stuff, but when we get to THIS particular issue, common sense and an ability to keep track of a conversation go flying out the window.
by Alex » Mon Sep 09, 2019 3:30 am
by Booney » Mon Sep 09, 2019 7:59 am
by gazzamagoo » Mon Sep 09, 2019 8:45 am
Booney wrote:Morning all.
Going well then?
by whufc » Mon Sep 09, 2019 8:48 am
Booney wrote:Morning all.
Going well then?
by whybother » Mon Sep 09, 2019 8:51 am
by Booney » Mon Sep 09, 2019 8:52 am
gazzamagoo wrote:Booney wrote:Morning all.
Going well then?
PERSETAN
by Booney » Mon Sep 09, 2019 8:53 am
whybother wrote:With 2 afl reserve teams playing, and a combined membership of 100000+, a crowd of about 11000 seems a bit poor
by Jim05 » Mon Sep 09, 2019 9:09 am
Booney wrote:Morning all.
Going well then?
by Booney » Mon Sep 09, 2019 9:18 am
Wedgie wrote:There's obviously not an IQ test to become a Crows or West supporter.
by woodublieve12 » Mon Sep 09, 2019 9:53 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |