Booney wrote: He'll play SANFL. The ground covered in the two is chalk and cheese.
Distance not so much in particular if you are getting beaten (chasing)
The percent intensity, of the distance covered though....
**** knows but if the absolute authority on all things PA disagrees look out. Don't you dare disagree with him. #selfimportance
Daisy! Good to hear from you. Everyone just assumed you were a front running flog who disappeared once Hawthorn dropped out of contention, not me, I knew you'd hang tough.
Booney wrote: He'll play SANFL. The ground covered in the two is chalk and cheese.
Distance not so much in particular if you are getting beaten (chasing)
The percent intensity, of the distance covered though....
**** knows but if the absolute authority on all things PA disagrees look out. Don't you dare disagree with him. #selfimportance
Daisy! Good to hear from you. Everyone just assumed you were a front running flog who disappeared once Hawthorn dropped out of contention, not me, I knew you'd hang tough.
I do reckon he has another alias on here as a Geelong supporter. He seems to have gone quiet as well.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
I know Port keep saying they can’t afford to pay out Ken’s final 2 years but surely they can’t afford 26k to home games on a perfect night when break even at AO is 30k? Maybe they can’t sack Ken otherwise the board would have to admit their mistakes and fall on their swords too
Jim05 wrote:I know Port keep saying they can’t afford to pay out Ken’s final 2 years but surely they can’t afford 26k to home games on a perfect night when break even at AO is 30k? Maybe they can’t sack Ken otherwise the board would have to admit their mistakes and fall on their swords too
Jim05 wrote:I know Port keep saying they can’t afford to pay out Ken’s final 2 years but surely they can’t afford 26k to home games on a perfect night when break even at AO is 30k? Maybe they can’t sack Ken otherwise the board would have to admit their mistakes and fall on their swords too
Discussed the first part last night.
And your thoughts? The members apathy for the club is nearly at an all time high and could really affect memberships next year. Surely there comes a breaking point where you bite the bullet and send him packing. Can’t see how you go into 2020 with him there
Jim05 wrote:I know Port keep saying they can’t afford to pay out Ken’s final 2 years but surely they can’t afford 26k to home games on a perfect night when break even at AO is 30k? Maybe they can’t sack Ken otherwise the board would have to admit their mistakes and fall on their swords too
40000 break even due to poor big bash crowds for the strikers this season
27k on a Saturday night.
Who else apart from those of us who did could of predicted ports crowds would drop off so dramatically.
Again.
Last edited by UK Fan on Sun Jul 28, 2019 11:40 am, edited 4 times in total.
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
Jim05 wrote:I know Port keep saying they can’t afford to pay out Ken’s final 2 years but surely they can’t afford 26k to home games on a perfect night when break even at AO is 30k? Maybe they can’t sack Ken otherwise the board would have to admit their mistakes and fall on their swords too
Discussed the first part last night.
And your thoughts? The members apathy for the club is nearly at an all time high and could really affect memberships next year. Surely there comes a breaking point where you bite the bullet and send him packing. Can’t see how you go into 2020 with him there
We can't afford to have people voting with their feet, as they did last night and will for the remaining home games.
Jim05 wrote:I know Port keep saying they can’t afford to pay out Ken’s final 2 years but surely they can’t afford 26k to home games on a perfect night when break even at AO is 30k? Maybe they can’t sack Ken otherwise the board would have to admit their mistakes and fall on their swords too
Discussed the first part last night.
And your thoughts? The members apathy for the club is nearly at an all time high and could really affect memberships next year. Surely there comes a breaking point where you bite the bullet and send him packing. Can’t see how you go into 2020 with him there
We can't afford to have people voting with their feet, as they did last night and will for the remaining home games.
Dutchy wrote:AFL have stepped in to take control of Port's finances.
How's this mail going mate?
It takes a while to review 4 years of mis-management
Only 4 ??
Im talking about the KT/Kooochie era only, Port fans acknowledge their previous admin mismanaged Port, not sure when they are going to face facts that this admin have also....
Jim05 wrote:I know Port keep saying they can’t afford to pay out Ken’s final 2 years but surely they can’t afford 26k to home games on a perfect night when break even at AO is 30k? Maybe they can’t sack Ken otherwise the board would have to admit their mistakes and fall on their swords too
Discussed the first part last night.
And your thoughts? The members apathy for the club is nearly at an all time high and could really affect memberships next year. Surely there comes a breaking point where you bite the bullet and send him packing. Can’t see how you go into 2020 with him there
We can't afford to have people voting with their feet, as they did last night and will for the remaining home games.
I thought Adelaide Oval was going to miraculously fix all of this ??
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
Dutchy wrote: Im talking about the KT/Kooochie era only, Port fans acknowledge their previous admin mismanaged Port, not sure when they are going to face facts that this admin have also....
Jim05 wrote:I know Port keep saying they can’t afford to pay out Ken’s final 2 years but surely they can’t afford 26k to home games on a perfect night when break even at AO is 30k? Maybe they can’t sack Ken otherwise the board would have to admit their mistakes and fall on their swords too
40000 break even due to poor big bash crowds for the strikers this season
27k on a Saturday night.
Who else apart from those of us who did could of predicted ports crowds would drop off so dramatically.
Again.
Your obsession of PA crowds is embarrassing. I suspect you also support UUU CROWS but don't have the balls to admit it.
Jim05 wrote:I know Port keep saying they can’t afford to pay out Ken’s final 2 years but surely they can’t afford 26k to home games on a perfect night when break even at AO is 30k? Maybe they can’t sack Ken otherwise the board would have to admit their mistakes and fall on their swords too
40000 break even due to poor big bash crowds for the strikers this season
27k on a Saturday night.
Who else apart from those of us who did could of predicted ports crowds would drop off so dramatically.
How did Ryder go? Did he predominantly play as a forward or did he go in the middle as well? I didn’t see much of the game as I was celebrating Carlton’s win over the Crows.
I heard Sutcliffe didn’t do much again either.
There are no stupid questions, just stupid people.
Jim05 wrote:I know Port keep saying they can’t afford to pay out Ken’s final 2 years but surely they can’t afford 26k to home games on a perfect night when break even at AO is 30k? Maybe they can’t sack Ken otherwise the board would have to admit their mistakes and fall on their swords too
40000 break even due to poor big bash crowds for the strikers this season
27k on a Saturday night.
Who else apart from those of us who did could of predicted ports crowds would drop off so dramatically.
Again.
You're f****** cooked.
He's got to amuse himself somehow, Centrals have fallen in a hole like they were in for the first 40 years so he's got nothing to be hanging his hat on.
amber_fluid wrote:How did Ryder go? Did he predominantly play as a forward or did he go in the middle as well? I didn’t see much of the game as I was celebrating Carlton’s win over the Crows.
I heard Sutcliffe didn’t do much again either.
Ryder would have rucked 40% of the game at a guess. Allowed Lycett to spend some time forward rather than going to the bench when he's not rucking.
Sutcliffe was his usual self, and by that I mean generally irrelevant. Missed an easy goal in the last quarter too.
Duur's miss half way through the last qtr hurt a lot. 7.13 and losing by a point. Bad kicking is bad footy.
I couldn't believe the lack of respect we showed Finlayson. Always had plenty of room and he hurt us. 3.3, with all three points being hit the post. Could have easily had 5 or 6 and made us look even more stupider than we already do.
Danny Southern telling Plugga he's fat, I'd like to see that!
amber_fluid wrote:How did Ryder go? Did he predominantly play as a forward or did he go in the middle as well? I didn’t see much of the game as I was celebrating Carlton’s win over the Crows.
I heard Sutcliffe didn’t do much again either.
I haven't been able to watch Port closely enough in the last few weeks to form an opinion, but one Port supporter threw up an interesting take in a FB group the other day. Whilst Supercoach can be a terrible guide for success or failure, Sutcliffe on Neale and then Martin (IIRC) saw those two players record SC scores miles below their average. Like I said, not necessarily a reasonable guide but maybe he's limited the output of matchwinners better than most have given him credit for?
Port had so many chances to actually take the lead at times on Sat night but would miss very gettable goals .. Always makes supporters/viewers question their mental belief/confidence (albeit that might not be relevant at all).
Tough for Port now which is a shame because everyone knows how capable they can be.
