by Down the Hill » Tue Jul 02, 2019 2:15 pm
by marbles » Tue Jul 02, 2019 2:43 pm
by Mr Beefy » Tue Jul 02, 2019 2:48 pm
by The Bedge » Tue Jul 02, 2019 2:53 pm
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by Down the Hill » Tue Jul 02, 2019 3:09 pm
by Mr Beefy » Tue Jul 02, 2019 3:21 pm
Down the Hill wrote:That is more likely the MDO's in that picture. Not sure what Rosewater do but there is no need for a dedicated Interchange Steward now that all interchanges don't need to be recorded which they shouldn't have to be in this day and age of wholesale interchanges. It's a waste of a volunteer to have a dedicated person fill out the League supplied White Card for something that may not even happen in a given game.
The clubs should be conversant with the rules and Team Managers or someone else who has a role on the bench can easily manage this task. But no club should take it upon themselves as to when their player can return to the field and you should always get a nod or a thumbs up from the other bench to confirm they too are satisfied that the 10 minutes has elapsed. At least that's what we do.
by oldman » Tue Jul 02, 2019 4:07 pm
by marbles » Tue Jul 02, 2019 8:02 pm
Mr Beefy wrote:I assume one of the blokes in orange is the interchange steward.....wouldn't have a clue who is coming on and off for Districtsinterchange.JPG
oldman wrote:Also districts admitted wrong doing at half time as the player was then sat on the bench for the remained of that time which he didn't serve originally.
by FOURTH ESTATE » Tue Jul 02, 2019 11:02 pm
Down the Hill wrote:That is more likely the MDO's in that picture. Not sure what Rosewater do but there is no need for a dedicated Interchange Steward now that all interchanges don't need to be recorded which they shouldn't have to be in this day and age of wholesale interchanges. It's a waste of a volunteer to have a dedicated person fill out the League supplied White Card for something that may not even happen in a given game.
The clubs should be conversant with the rules and Team Managers or someone else who has a role on the bench can easily manage this task. But no club should take it upon themselves as to when their player can return to the field and you should always get a nod or a thumbs up from the other bench to confirm they too are satisfied that the 10 minutes has elapsed. At least that's what we do.
by Look Good In Leather » Wed Jul 03, 2019 12:52 am
oldman wrote:Let's stop passing the blame here. Every A grade player and coach know that a yellow card is 10 mins. Only the coach and players are responsible for interchanges between players. Pretty simple decision to be made on this regardless of the final score. Player kicked a goal when his 10 mins for a yellow card is still valid he should never have been put back on the field until after this time elapsed. Goal should not count as he can be seen on the video footage on the field and goaling. Also districts admitted wrong doing at half time as the player was then sat on the bench for the remained of that time which he didn't serve originally.
It's unfortunate that the game was decided the way of a draw if Henley had won or districts by more than a goal then so be it but this has had a direct impact on that result and the goal should be withdrawn.
by oldman » Wed Jul 03, 2019 9:35 am
by jo172 » Wed Jul 03, 2019 12:04 pm
by The Bedge » Wed Jul 03, 2019 12:11 pm
jo172 wrote:I'm tending to think this is all a bit storm meet tea cup.
Yeah it's D1, yeah it would appear to have had the potential to alter the match, and perhaps consequentially the final 5.
Ultimately it's still amateur footy. Shit will at times happen for no other reason than accident.
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by Armchair expert » Wed Jul 03, 2019 12:29 pm
by jo172 » Wed Jul 03, 2019 12:44 pm
The Bedge wrote:jo172 wrote:I'm tending to think this is all a bit storm meet tea cup.
Yeah it's D1, yeah it would appear to have had the potential to alter the match, and perhaps consequentially the final 5.
Ultimately it's still amateur footy. Shit will at times happen for no other reason than accident.
Who cares about the top 5, it could well be the difference between Henley staying up or being relegated.. i mean they still need to close percentage gap on AU, and win games.. but not sure "shit happens" would make them feel better if they ended up in D2 off the back of this.
by Senor Moto Gadili » Wed Jul 03, 2019 1:51 pm
Armchair expert wrote:If a players comes back on early and doesn't kick a goal, would anyone know?
by oldman » Wed Jul 03, 2019 3:20 pm
Senor Moto Gadili wrote:Armchair expert wrote:If a players comes back on early and doesn't kick a goal, would anyone know?
Possibly not and that's the issue. I don't believe the fact that he kicked a goal is relevant. One could argue that the player who replaced him could have kicked the goal. If Port Districts are to be penalised I don't believe taking the goal off them is an appropriate penalty.
by Trader » Wed Jul 03, 2019 3:31 pm
oldman wrote:Senor Moto Gadili wrote:Armchair expert wrote:If a players comes back on early and doesn't kick a goal, would anyone know?
Possibly not and that's the issue. I don't believe the fact that he kicked a goal is relevant. One could argue that the player who replaced him could have kicked the goal. If Port Districts are to be penalised I don't believe taking the goal off them is an appropriate penalty.
I'm sure the powers to be will make the correct decision. My thoughts are the only suitable penalty is to disallow the goal as that's the only outcome which is fair to Henley who are the innocent victim I'm this case.
by marbles » Wed Jul 03, 2019 3:47 pm
Trader wrote:oldman wrote:Senor Moto Gadili wrote:Armchair expert wrote:If a players comes back on early and doesn't kick a goal, would anyone know?
Possibly not and that's the issue. I don't believe the fact that he kicked a goal is relevant. One could argue that the player who replaced him could have kicked the goal. If Port Districts are to be penalised I don't believe taking the goal off them is an appropriate penalty.
I'm sure the powers to be will make the correct decision. My thoughts are the only suitable penalty is to disallow the goal as that's the only outcome which is fair to Henley who are the innocent victim I'm this case.
Please, Henley are the home team and have failed to provide a suitable interchange steward who was able to execute the duties of the role.
Henley should be fined by the league and have all future home games moved to a neutral venue until such time that the sharks are able to prove they have addressed the issue at hand. Furthermore, Henley should be required to issue a written apology to Port Districts for dragging them into this mess.
by jo172 » Wed Jul 03, 2019 3:48 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |