11 Crows cleared for SANFL finals

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Re: 11 Crows cleared for SANFL finals

Postby LPH » Tue Sep 11, 2007 1:19 pm

sturtpeter wrote:My point: Why take an out of form Martin Mattner to Melbourne as Emergency when Vince is in CAREER BEST FORM :roll: :roll:


Because it's a conspiracy directed @ Sturt !!! :roll:

So you don't get the Double Chance & are knocked out in the Elimination Final :shock:
Stephen Trigg & Rob Chapman are SA Football Patriots
User avatar
LPH
League - Best 21
 
Posts: 2455
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 10:45 am
Location: Craven Cottage
Has liked: 541 times
Been liked: 326 times
Grassroots Team: Kenilworth

Re: 11 Crows cleared for SANFL finals

Postby Dogwatcher » Tue Sep 11, 2007 1:20 pm

Hmmm - he does have a good point.

I'm just not sure what it's got to do with karma.
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
Dogwatcher
Coach
 
 
Posts: 29318
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:29 am
Location: The Bronx
Has liked: 1425 times
Been liked: 1152 times
Grassroots Team: Elizabeth

Re: 11 Crows cleared for SANFL finals

Postby Mickyj » Tue Sep 11, 2007 8:15 pm

sturtpeter wrote:My point: Why take an out of form Martin Mattner to Melbourne as Emergency when Vince is in CAREER BEST FORM :roll: :roll:

Seeing I was sitting in the grandstand not far from LEH and didn't witness the Crows game.Can I ask why they took ROO with an injured knee into such an important game .They could have taken everyone with them but if THEY played injured players its the Crows coaching staffs fault.Seeing Douglas went along why not play him
But personally I'm glad they didn't take Vince. :wink: :lol:
Land based Lure Bream Fisherman
PB
Hardbody Bream 38cm
Hardbody Mulloway 40cm
Softplastic Bream 38cm
Fly Bream 30cm
User avatar
Mickyj
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7125
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 3:51 pm
Location: Barry Jarman Stand FORTRESS WOODVILLE
Has liked: 154 times
Been liked: 22 times

Re: 11 Crows cleared for SANFL finals

Postby BPBRB » Tue Sep 11, 2007 10:24 pm

sturtpeter wrote:My point: Why take an out of form Martin Mattner to Melbourne as Emergency when Vince is in CAREER BEST FORM :roll: :roll:


So Sturt can play can "out of form player" they are that desperate? Seriously SP you couldn't give a shit about the Crows playing an "in form" SANFL player - you only want Mattner to bolster Sturt because they have no depth.
BPBRB
 

Re: 11 Crows cleared for SANFL finals

Postby csbowes » Tue Sep 11, 2007 10:42 pm

I'm beginning to think I'm the only one who thinks letting these players back into the SANFL is wrong. I think players should have to actually play something like 7 games to play in the finals. I think its rich that a whole bunch of players from a local AFL team that has been an abject failure in a given year, can then overload a local team, taking spots from other deserving players, with its cast offs, thus tipping the balance of SANFL finals.

I don't think Mattner should play for Sturt. He hasn't earnt the right to play for our club. Its the rest of the team that got them to where they are and they deserve the opportunity to make something of the finals series.

Plus if you're a club that produces talented players, who make the AFL grade, but get drafted interstate, you luck out big time when compared to other clubs who just so happen to have their players drafted by the Crows or Power. I really don't understand why more SANFL teams, lets be honest, the bottom 6 clubs, don't protest against it and change the rules. Why Sturt would want to allow North, Torrens and Centrals to be overloaded with AFL players at finals time is beyond me.

Anyway, just my thoughts. Sturt made the bed, so they can lie in it. This isn't a whinge because of where my club finds itself, I just honestly don't feel its right to change the composition of sides at finals time like we do.

I'm actually surprised the league even likes it.
csbowes
League - Best 21
 
Posts: 1632
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 7:32 pm
Location: Alma
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 77 times

Re: 11 Crows cleared for SANFL finals

Postby BPBRB » Tue Sep 11, 2007 10:51 pm

I agree with you csbowes but despite having a bigger qualification criteria e.g. at least half the games in the SANFL, there are still loopholes. If the 2 Adelaide based AFL clubs whilst alive in their finals can play any of their players in our finals.

So to give an absurd example - if Power played last week and lost and have to play again this week (double chance) but they deemed that both Cornes boys were sh*t last week and decided to drop them they would play for the Bays this week, even though neither has played a game for the bays for years! They could play the following week too if Port stayed alive including upto the AFL GF weekend. They couldn't play in our GF as they don't meet the standard 3 game criteria.
BPBRB
 

Re: 11 Crows cleared for SANFL finals

Postby sturt1 » Tue Sep 11, 2007 11:26 pm

BPBRB wrote:
sturtpeter wrote:My point: Why take an out of form Martin Mattner to Melbourne as Emergency when Vince is in CAREER BEST FORM :roll: :roll:


So Sturt can play can "out of form player" they are that desperate? Seriously SP you couldn't give a s***t about the Crows playing an "in form" SANFL player - you only want Mattner to bolster Sturt because they have no depth.


They have plenty of depth, they just have too many injuries. Injuries that north couldnt cope with.
But it was more than a victory for Greece. It was a stirring example to free people throughout the world of what a few brave men can accomplish once they refuse to submit to tyranny.
sturt1
Under 18s
 
Posts: 719
Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2006 7:29 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: 11 Crows cleared for SANFL finals

Postby Hondo » Tue Sep 11, 2007 11:30 pm

Oh here we go ....

:D
In between signatures .....
User avatar
Hondo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7927
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Glandore, Adelaide
Has liked: 70 times
Been liked: 32 times

Re: 11 Crows cleared for SANFL finals

Postby BPBRB » Tue Sep 11, 2007 11:35 pm

sturt1 wrote:
BPBRB wrote:
sturtpeter wrote:My point: Why take an out of form Martin Mattner to Melbourne as Emergency when Vince is in CAREER BEST FORM :roll: :roll:


So Sturt can play can "out of form player" they are that desperate? Seriously SP you couldn't give a s***t about the Crows playing an "in form" SANFL player - you only want Mattner to bolster Sturt because they have no depth.


They have plenty of depth, they just have too many injuries. Injuries that north couldnt cope with.


Crap - we have bad injury runs the last 2 years in the minor round but still managed to finish second and you would have to be thick if you argue Sturt's depth is that of North's. We managed to cover our injuries for the past two years and now you get some injuries your all crying out for AFL listed players to save you.
BPBRB
 

Re: 11 Crows cleared for SANFL finals

Postby Grahaml » Tue Sep 11, 2007 11:44 pm

Westy will be allowed to play the SANFL GF after the AFL GF under the rules but whether the Power allows it to happen is another matter. Would have thought the kid would be eager to play once AFL duties are done and dusted.

The other matter of the "bottom 6" clubs complaining about the issue is those are the clubs most likely to benefit from any qualification of AFL players for finals. Those clubs are the ones who are more likely to want the status quo so if they make the finals next season they can have their best side in given they have first pick in the mini draft.

And anyone saying you just can't take injured players into a GF is delusional. No footy team at that time of year plays a team of fully fit players. If they'd known how it would end up they wouldn't have played him but Riccuito carrying a knee is worth more than Douglas fully fit 90% of the time. If you knew the reality of how many players carry injuries through finals series you wouldn't have a 22 man team!
Grahaml
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4812
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 11:59 am
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 169 times

Re: 11 Crows cleared for SANFL finals

Postby LPH » Wed Sep 12, 2007 10:26 am

Grahaml wrote:Westy will be allowed to play the SANFL GF after the AFL GF under the rules but whether the Power allows it to happen is another matter. Would have thought the kid would be eager to play once AFL duties are done and dusted.

The other matter of the "bottom 6" clubs complaining about the issue is those are the clubs most likely to benefit from any qualification of AFL players for finals. Those clubs are the ones who are more likely to want the status quo so if they make the finals next season they can have their best side in given they have first pick in the mini draft.

And anyone saying you just can't take injured players into a GF is delusional. No footy team at that time of year plays a team of fully fit players. If they'd known how it would end up they wouldn't have played him but Riccuito carrying a knee is worth more than Douglas fully fit 90% of the time. If you knew the reality of how many players carry injuries through finals series you wouldn't have a 22 man team!


Good call on ALL counts here 'GL' :)
I don't believe you are a Centrals supporter !!! LOL :lol: :lol:
Stephen Trigg & Rob Chapman are SA Football Patriots
User avatar
LPH
League - Best 21
 
Posts: 2455
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 10:45 am
Location: Craven Cottage
Has liked: 541 times
Been liked: 326 times
Grassroots Team: Kenilworth

Re: 11 Crows cleared for SANFL finals

Postby Blue Boy » Wed Sep 12, 2007 11:16 am

Our depth has been tested at the wrong end of the year there is no doubt about that at all - as at the start of the year both the league side and reserves were both winning games.

Now our league side has fallen from 2nd to 4th and our reserves have not even made the finals - so it is obvious to eveyone our depth must be improved and im pretty confident that it will be in the up and coming years.

Now for Marty Mattner I am stoked that he will be playing and will not shy away from him making our finals side at all and even more so as he is a real Blue Boy . The Double Blues have been on the wrong end of the AFL player rule a few times in the past as every team probably has so I am taking Marty's place in the side as a massive bonus for us.

We have played several first gamers over the last few weeks as we have needed to cover injuries so I really dont believe that anyone will be really missing out as no one has really put up there hand and say pick me again as our results have shown.
It is what it is !!!
User avatar
Blue Boy
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3625
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2006 3:44 pm
Location: Any where between here and there
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1 time
Grassroots Team: Flagstaff Hill

Re: 11 Crows cleared for SANFL finals

Postby sturtpeter » Wed Sep 12, 2007 2:42 pm

I am a little confused about you being confused about me writing about Karma???


The Karma is, Mattner travelling as an emergency to Melbourne worked out as Karma for Professor Craig.

Vince in form would surely have been a sounder option.

Go U Blues :lol: :lol: :lol:
Avid Sturt supporter and SANFL fanatic.
User avatar
sturtpeter
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1680
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2005 9:11 am
Location: Parkside SA
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 4 times
Grassroots Team: Glenunga

Re: 11 Crows cleared for SANFL finals

Postby Dogwatcher » Wed Sep 12, 2007 2:50 pm

I wasn't sure who the Karma was for Craigy, Mattner, Vince or the Eagles, who knows with you.

I don't think Mattner nor Vince would've changed what happened to the Crows.

Roo is their talisman, he thought he was fit enough to play - that alone would've boosted the Crows significantly. That role alone made him very important.
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
Dogwatcher
Coach
 
 
Posts: 29318
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:29 am
Location: The Bronx
Has liked: 1425 times
Been liked: 1152 times
Grassroots Team: Elizabeth

Re: 11 Crows cleared for SANFL finals

Postby sturt1 » Wed Sep 12, 2007 8:21 pm

BPBRB wrote:
sturt1 wrote:
BPBRB wrote:
sturtpeter wrote:My point: Why take an out of form Martin Mattner to Melbourne as Emergency when Vince is in CAREER BEST FORM :roll: :roll:


So Sturt can play can "out of form player" they are that desperate? Seriously SP you couldn't give a s***t about the Crows playing an "in form" SANFL player - you only want Mattner to bolster Sturt because they have no depth.


They have plenty of depth, they just have too many injuries. Injuries that north couldnt cope with.


Crap - we have bad injury runs the last 2 years in the minor round but still managed to finish second and you would have to be thick if you argue Sturt's depth is that of North's. We managed to cover our injuries for the past two years and now you get some injuries your all crying out for AFL listed players to save you.


You cant be humble in victory, i will give you no credit for it. Injuries were the reason, full stop.
But it was more than a victory for Greece. It was a stirring example to free people throughout the world of what a few brave men can accomplish once they refuse to submit to tyranny.
sturt1
Under 18s
 
Posts: 719
Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2006 7:29 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: 11 Crows cleared for SANFL finals

Postby Grahaml » Wed Sep 12, 2007 8:45 pm

Does anyone remember ayybuddeeee from footysa? These posts have a rather familiar sound about them....
Grahaml
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4812
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 11:59 am
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 169 times

Re: 11 Crows cleared for SANFL finals

Postby Wedgie » Wed Sep 12, 2007 8:47 pm

Good call, he does to!
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Re: 11 Crows cleared for SANFL finals

Postby BPBRB » Thu Sep 13, 2007 12:37 am

sturt1 wrote: You cant be humble in victory, i will give you no credit for it. Injuries were the reason, full stop.


Humble in victory - go back and read the majority of my posts re the game from Friday night and this weeks elimination final FFS!!! I have been more than complimentary about Sturt's performance considering their injuries and the fact North got out of jail but you have refused to acknowledge those posts and now you give me a condensending sarcastic response. You and one or two other Sturt "fans" are really carrying on like babies. The fact is you blew a 50 point lead 5 minutes into the third quarter and as bad as North have been in some years in past "era's" I can't ever recall them doing what Sturt did. Cue Spelly to see if we can chalk up another record for those "might baby blues"?

Seriously you would think that North went out during the week and intentionally mugged your players then used dirty tatics to take out Feast and Sheedy but I'm sure you will have some link to blame North for those injuires.
BPBRB
 

Re: 11 Crows cleared for SANFL finals

Postby sturt1 » Thu Sep 13, 2007 7:45 am

BPBRB wrote:
sturt1 wrote: You cant be humble in victory, i will give you no credit for it. Injuries were the reason, full stop.


Humble in victory - go back and read the majority of my posts re the game from Friday night and this weeks elimination final FFS!!! I have been more than complimentary about Sturt's performance considering their injuries and the fact North got out of jail but you have refused to acknowledge those posts and now you give me a condensending sarcastic response. You and one or two other Sturt "fans" are really carrying on like babies. The fact is you blew a 50 point lead 5 minutes into the third quarter and as bad as North have been in some years in past "era's" I can't ever recall them doing what Sturt did. Cue Spelly to see if we can chalk up another record for those "might baby blues"?

Seriously you would think that North went out during the week and intentionally mugged your players then used dirty tatics to take out Feast and Sheedy but I'm sure you will have some link to blame North for those injuires.


Ask ginger about that, he is tough. Looking for our biggest player to take out.
But it was more than a victory for Greece. It was a stirring example to free people throughout the world of what a few brave men can accomplish once they refuse to submit to tyranny.
sturt1
Under 18s
 
Posts: 719
Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2006 7:29 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: 11 Crows cleared for SANFL finals

Postby Wedgie » Thu Sep 13, 2007 8:10 am

sturt1 is the clever one, he's finally worked out our plan.
Get Brett O'Hara to play many years with the Eagles including juniors without doing one thing to get reported, get him to play state games without get reported, get him to play for North for 2 years without getting reported and THEN get him to thump (ie push in the chest) a Sturt player.
What a mongrel and all part of our 8 year plan to win a game against Sturt at Adelaide Oval on a Friday Night! :lol:
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 6 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |