Wazz17 wrote:https://www.dartfish.tv/Player?CR=p132071c307101m4770473 around the 17 minute mark first quarter
Would have no problem if they just pissed the bloke off for good.
That's exactly the on thing that is majorly wrong with amateur football. Nothing more than a coward thug! The game is better off without blokes like him.
Didn't even faze the dude that got hit, should've been 50 though, possibly 100 given that he had already won the free kick.
Whether it fazed him or not his intent was a complete disgrace.
That’s as black and white a standard football play that didn’t require a bloke to start throwing punches as you will see. If he can’t deal with being tackled lol that there is no place in the sport for him. Needs to take up mma or boxing if he has the courage
whufc wrote:Whether it fazed him or not his intent was a complete disgrace.
That’s as black and white a standard football play that didn’t require a bloke to start throwing punches as you will see. If he can’t deal with being tackled lol that there is no place in the sport for him. Needs to take up mma or boxing if he has the courage
Ease up Turbo, I wasn't implying that I thought it was fine, just making a mere comment
I was going to say the same thing Trader. That bounce was never coming back up to him. Perfect tackle from the Seaton lad when dealing with a don't argue. And a nice face plant from Harris of Seaton as he tried to intervene. But definitely if you react that way to being fairly tackled then you should take up another past time.
Dutchy wrote:I like how not many of his team mates supported him when the Seaton boys went at him
That's because we have a melee rule. The seaton guy that came barrelling in and hit the broadies player in the back of the head on his way through probably shouldn't go unnoticed either.
^^^ imagine just standing around watching your team mates head get punched in and not at least helping diffuse the situation. Let’s just employ NHL rules when it comes to fights while we’re at it
Trader wrote:Can't see him getting away with less than 4 weeks for each of the 3 strikes, that will sort it out right there.
Will they charge him for each strike, or would it be one charge for the whole fiasco?
I'm going with 8 games total.. Intentional > High Contact > High Impact (could argue lesser impact).
If they want him out of the game, they charge him 3 times, intentional and high contact, then the impact doesn't really matter. If they want to give him another chance, then they could do it as one, but that would certainly leave the league open to criticism.
Danny Southern telling Plugga he's fat, I'd like to see that!
Hard to see un umpire watching that and changing his mind.
Whilst its a red im not sure it should reflect on SN too harshly as it was at least a footballing act despite being a bit reckless in this day and age.
Whilst I don’t condone what our lad did and he will be dealt with by the tribunal.However he received a free for A high tackle not against him for holding the ball, just to clear that up.
