Southern Football League

A forum dedicated to the Southern Football League!
woodublieve12
Coach
Posts: 17951
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 5:48 pm
Team: Glenelg
Team: Sydney Swans
Has thanked: 3235 times
Been thanked: 2576 times
Contact:

Re: Southern Football League

Post by woodublieve12 »

Tiger83 wrote:
woodublieve12 wrote:
Dutchy wrote:
shoe boy wrote:I believe a number of parents are not happy that during the under 12 carnival their kids missed out so that kids that had played under 13 all year played in the 12 carnival at the expense of their kids who had played under 12 all year !

good luck getting them parents back.


Which club?

We didn't play 5 kids who have been playing u13's all year cause of this issue specifically.

This is another issue with the ridiculous 13/15/17.5 junior set up, should have never been agreed to in the first place, time to go back to 14/16/18.


THIS!!!
Made zero sense changing it in the first place...


Might not make sense at local level, but isn’t it to bring the age groups into line statewide?? Was that the reason for the change?? The old CFB getting to push their weight around??

But you'd think being in line with SANFL is more important???
"Be curious, not judgmental""
Courtney Fish
Under 16s
Posts: 421
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 9:17 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Team: OSB Lonsdale
Location: Usually near the Bar
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 45 times
Contact:

Re: Southern Football League

Post by Courtney Fish »

Look Good In Leather wrote:
Dutchy wrote:This is another issue with the ridiculous 13/15/17.5 junior set up, should have never been agreed to in the first place, time to go back to 14/16/18.


Rubbish, one of the best things we ever did.

We have not been split up once on a Saturday this year, all clubs have a full set (except for one team in the 17.5s), less behavioral issue as the older kids are now playing senior football whilst also providing a larger pool of players in the oldest age group.

The mistake was not changing the Minis to be inline (ie U/11, U/9 & U/7)


I agree, having a stand alone year level in the middle of the junior setup is a bad idea. Have either all odd years starting at under 7's finishing at 17.5's or all even years starting at under 8's through to 18's.
Tiger83
Under 18s
Posts: 581
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 10:43 am
Has thanked: 48 times
Been thanked: 23 times
Contact:

Re: Southern Football League

Post by Tiger83 »

THIS!!!
Made zero sense changing it in the first place...[/quote]

Might not make sense at local level, but isn’t it to bring the age groups into line statewide?? Was that the reason for the change?? The old CFB getting to push their weight around??[/quote]
But you'd think being in line with SANFL is more important???[/quote]

You’d think so yes, but I think the SANFL get bent over for anything the AFL want and I think that’s where the directive ultimately came from...
Broken Down Hack
Rookie
Posts: 152
Joined: Fri May 11, 2012 5:26 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Has thanked: 49 times
Been thanked: 15 times
Contact:

Re: Southern Football League

Post by Broken Down Hack »

Impressive finish to the minor round season off SFL
average winning margin 130pts ....
jake the snake
Under 16s
Posts: 339
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 7:24 pm
Been thanked: 15 times
Contact:

Re: Southern Football League

Post by jake the snake »

League is cooked, crowds are down, I thought results would even up with marion and osb leaving?
User avatar
helicopterking
Coach
Posts: 5860
Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 9:38 pm
Team: West Coast Eagles
Has thanked: 310 times
Been thanked: 713 times
Contact:

Re: Southern Football League

Post by helicopterking »

Is this competition still going?
Courtney Fish
Under 16s
Posts: 421
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 9:17 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Team: OSB Lonsdale
Location: Usually near the Bar
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 45 times
Contact:

Re: Southern Football League

Post by Courtney Fish »

jake the snake wrote:League is cooked, crowds are down, I thought results would even up with marion and osb leaving?


It's just someone elses turn to be the easybeats now. Someone has to be at the bottom.
User avatar
Zelezny Chucks
League - Best 21
Posts: 2080
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 5:57 pm
Team: North Melbourne
Team: Morphett Vale
Has thanked: 22 times
Been thanked: 99 times
Contact:

Re: Southern Football League

Post by Zelezny Chucks »

Courtney Fish wrote:
jake the snake wrote:League is cooked, crowds are down, I thought results would even up with marion and osb leaving?


It's just someone elses turn to be the easybeats now. Someone has to be at the bottom.


Except it's more than that. The standard of the league has dropped dramatically.

Flaggies would be the only team I would rate as being up with the best in the state. 10 years ago I would have said the top 6 would have mixed it at that level. Top players wouldn't even consider playing in the SFL anymore if they aren't already aligned with a club.

When the top side is beating the 4th side by 20 goals a week out from finals it raises questions. Sadly though it's probably too late to fix.
The_Goss
Mini-League
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2017 10:35 am
Team: South Adelaide
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Aldinga
Been thanked: 2 times
Contact:

Re: Southern Football League

Post by The_Goss »

helicopterking wrote:Is this competition still going?


Coming from a Marion supporter whose club took the easy option, moved to a competition/division which would be the 2nd or 3rd worst standard in the state, spent a bucket load of cash and still probably won't win the flag....... Laughable!
jet-airport
Rookie
Posts: 227
Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 7:14 pm
Team: South Adelaide
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Reynella
Location: Behind the Keg
Has thanked: 34 times
Been thanked: 15 times
Contact:

Re: Southern Football League

Post by jet-airport »

Zelezny Chucks wrote:
Courtney Fish wrote:
jake the snake wrote:League is cooked, crowds are down, I thought results would even up with marion and osb leaving?


It's just someone elses turn to be the easybeats now. Someone has to be at the bottom.


Except it's more than that. The standard of the league has dropped dramatically.

Flaggies would be the only team I would rate as being up with the best in the state. 10 years ago I would have said the top 6 would have mixed it at that level. Top players wouldn't even consider playing in the SFL anymore if they aren't already aligned with a club.

When the top side is beating the 4th side by 20 goals a week out from finals it raises questions. Sadly though it's probably too late to fix.


Think you'll find it was a dead rubber game as such, Saints couldn't move from 4th.
User avatar
Zelezny Chucks
League - Best 21
Posts: 2080
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 5:57 pm
Team: North Melbourne
Team: Morphett Vale
Has thanked: 22 times
Been thanked: 99 times
Contact:

Re: Southern Football League

Post by Zelezny Chucks »

jet-airport wrote:
Zelezny Chucks wrote:
Courtney Fish wrote:
jake the snake wrote:League is cooked, crowds are down, I thought results would even up with marion and osb leaving?


It's just someone elses turn to be the easybeats now. Someone has to be at the bottom.


Except it's more than that. The standard of the league has dropped dramatically.

Flaggies would be the only team I would rate as being up with the best in the state. 10 years ago I would have said the top 6 would have mixed it at that level. Top players wouldn't even consider playing in the SFL anymore if they aren't already aligned with a club.

When the top side is beating the 4th side by 20 goals a week out from finals it raises questions. Sadly though it's probably too late to fix.


Think you'll find it was a dead rubber game as such, Saints couldn't move from 4th.


LOL - you can't be serious that you think this is the reason they got beaten by 20 goals? What did the Bushpigs have to play for? They'd wrapped up top spot already as well. A 10 goal loss you might be able to make a case for but at some point pride should kick in.
jet-airport
Rookie
Posts: 227
Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 7:14 pm
Team: South Adelaide
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Reynella
Location: Behind the Keg
Has thanked: 34 times
Been thanked: 15 times
Contact:

Re: Southern Football League

Post by jet-airport »

[


When the top side is beating the 4th side by 20 goals a week out from finals it raises questions. Sadly though it's probably too late to fix.[/quote]

Think you'll find it was a dead rubber game as such, Saints couldn't move from 4th.[/quote]

LOL - you can't be serious that you think this is the reason they got beaten by 20 goals? What did the Bushpigs have to play for? They'd wrapped up top spot already as well. A 10 goal loss you might be able to make a case for but at some point pride should kick in.[/quote]

Wasn't at the game, so cant comment on why 20 goal, my comment was Saints side could not change positions was my point, I wouldn't expect the same result come finals if they did cross paths? maybe only 10 goals as you said :D
Animus
Under 16s
Posts: 449
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 1:48 pm
Team: West Coast Eagles
Has thanked: 14 times
Been thanked: 20 times
Contact:

Re: Southern Football League

Post by Animus »

Saints were playing for 3rd spot & the double chance, not exactly a dead rubber
jet-airport
Rookie
Posts: 227
Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 7:14 pm
Team: South Adelaide
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Reynella
Location: Behind the Keg
Has thanked: 34 times
Been thanked: 15 times
Contact:

Re: Southern Football League

Post by jet-airport »

Animus wrote:Saints were playing for 3rd spot & the double chance, not exactly a dead rubber


Porties were playing M / vale and had 5% better % than Christies, as I said Christies couldn't get any higher .

Look forward to a close finals series, should be 2 x competitive games Sat & Sunday. Shoe and the Winey's for me.
Animus
Under 16s
Posts: 449
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 1:48 pm
Team: West Coast Eagles
Has thanked: 14 times
Been thanked: 20 times
Contact:

Re: Southern Football League

Post by Animus »

jet-airport wrote:
Animus wrote:Saints were playing for 3rd spot & the double chance, not exactly a dead rubber


Porties were playing M / vale and had 5% better % than Christies, as I said Christies couldn't get any higher .

Look forward to a close finals series, should be 2 x competitive games Sat & Sunday. Shoe and the Winey's for me.



Christies % was 2.26 better than Porties after Rd 17...but let's not let the truth get in the way of a good story :roll:
User avatar
Zelezny Chucks
League - Best 21
Posts: 2080
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 5:57 pm
Team: North Melbourne
Team: Morphett Vale
Has thanked: 22 times
Been thanked: 99 times
Contact:

Re: Southern Football League

Post by Zelezny Chucks »

Animus wrote:
jet-airport wrote:
Animus wrote:Saints were playing for 3rd spot & the double chance, not exactly a dead rubber


Porties were playing M / vale and had 5% better % than Christies, as I said Christies couldn't get any higher .

Look forward to a close finals series, should be 2 x competitive games Sat & Sunday. Shoe and the Winey's for me.



Christies % was 2.26 better than Porties after Rd 17...but let's not let the truth get in the way of a good story :roll:


Not sure what point was trying to be made with his original comment anyway. Christies rolling over because they couldn't move up or down is a pretty poor excuse for a drubbing if true and has no bearing on the fact that the standard of the league has dropped overall.

I'm sure Shaun Tanner would love to have heard that no one gave a shit about the result in a milestone game as well.
jet-airport
Rookie
Posts: 227
Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 7:14 pm
Team: South Adelaide
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Reynella
Location: Behind the Keg
Has thanked: 34 times
Been thanked: 15 times
Contact:

Re: Southern Football League

Post by jet-airport »

Animus wrote:
jet-airport wrote:
Animus wrote:Saints were playing for 3rd spot & the double chance, not exactly a dead rubber


Porties were playing M / vale and had 5% better % than Christies, as I said Christies couldn't get any higher .

Look forward to a close finals series, should be 2 x competitive games Sat & Sunday. Shoe and the Winey's for me.



Christies % was 2.26 better than Porties after Rd 17...but let's not let the truth get in the way of a good story :roll:


My bad was looking at final ladder% :oops:
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
Posts: 47486
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Team: Glenelg
Team: North Melbourne
Location: Location, Location
Has thanked: 2936 times
Been thanked: 4838 times
Contact:

Re: Southern Football League

Post by Dutchy »

Christies also playing for a home final
User avatar
helicopterking
Coach
Posts: 5860
Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 9:38 pm
Team: West Coast Eagles
Has thanked: 310 times
Been thanked: 713 times
Contact:

Re: Southern Football League

Post by helicopterking »

The_Goss wrote:
helicopterking wrote:Is this competition still going?


Coming from a Marion supporter whose club took the easy option, moved to a competition/division which would be the 2nd or 3rd worst standard in the state, spent a bucket load of cash and still probably won't win the flag....... Laughable!


Let me guess, Flagstaff Hill or Noarlunga involved?
Huge crowd at Marion today. Playing a GF next week and working up the divisions.
Could have stayed and been smashed every week, attracting no players and struggling to keep juniors transitioning into seniors because of it.
Can’t wait See how long Morphettvale stay being the whipping boys of the comp.
Last edited by helicopterking on Sun Sep 02, 2018 4:38 am, edited 1 time in total.
sweendog
Rookie
Posts: 143
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 9:46 am
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Collingwood
Team: Christies Beach
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 12 times
Contact:

Re: Southern Football League

Post by sweendog »

Well!! I hope saints put up a better fight than the cockdivers did today...while I’m at it can I get a refund??
Confirms sfl is on deathrow
oh when the saints go marching in
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests