Norwood v WWT Fri 1920

All discussions to do with the SANFL
User avatar
SABRE
Reserves
Posts: 911
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 8:24 pm
Team: Norwood
Location: Beyond Redemption
Been thanked: 44 times
Contact:

Re: Norwood v WWT Fri 1920

Post by SABRE »

Jim05 wrote:Us by 3-4 goals

DOC wrote:Legs by 4 goals

:shock:
Close enough Jim & DOC !!!
Could I impose upon you both the choice of my X-Lotto numbers for a few weeks fellas ?
Please PM me, we don't wan't to split the prize too many ways.
:-BD
Luv,
Sabre.
NFC 2021
mal
Coach
Posts: 32312
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:15 pm
Has thanked: 2710 times
Been thanked: 2994 times
Contact:

Re: Norwood v WWT Fri 1920

Post by mal »

Been told a Gold Coast observer watched this game
Should he be recommending to draft number 16 for Norwood ?
Jim05
Coach
Posts: 49466
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 8:33 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Essendon
Team: South Gawler
Has thanked: 1137 times
Been thanked: 4041 times
Contact:

Re: Norwood v WWT Fri 1920

Post by Jim05 »

mal wrote:Been told a Gold Coast observer watched this game
Should he be recommending to draft number 16 for Norwood ?

They are there to see number 14 and a couple of mature age players
User avatar
Aerie
Coach
Posts: 5826
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 1:35 am
Team: Eagles
Has thanked: 199 times
Been thanked: 610 times
Contact:

Re: Norwood v WWT Fri 1920

Post by Aerie »

Jim05 wrote:
mal wrote:Been told a Gold Coast observer watched this game
Should he be recommending to draft number 16 for Norwood ?

They are there to see number 14 and a couple of mature age players


And maybe Lukosius...
wedgetail
Reserves
Posts: 790
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 10:16 pm
Team: Eagles
Location: The Eagle Eye over Oval Ave
Has thanked: 255 times
Been thanked: 112 times
Contact:

Re: Norwood v WWT Fri 1920

Post by wedgetail »

Norwood put on a clinic after 1/4 time. Too physically big and strong, quick, skilful ball movement, attractive brand of footy. Premiership favs without doubt.
Luck is where opportunity meets preparation
spell_check
Coach
Posts: 18872
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:26 pm
Team: Eagles
Has thanked: 51 times
Been thanked: 258 times
Contact:

Re: Norwood v WWT Fri 1920

Post by spell_check »

I thought the 1st quarter was befitting of a 1 v 2 contest. Best standard of footy I've seen for ages.

After that, I might go out on a limb and say it was the best standard of footy by one side I've seen live since Centrals were at their peak.
northerner
League Bench Warmer
Posts: 1294
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2017 4:18 pm
Team: Central District
Team: Eastern Park
Has thanked: 295 times
Been thanked: 573 times
Contact:

Re: Norwood v WWT Fri 1920

Post by northerner »

wedgetail wrote:Norwood put on a clinic after 1/4 time. Too physically big and strong, quick, skilful ball movement, attractive brand of footy. Premiership favs without doubt.


That's what I noticed when the Legs belted us at the Parade a couple of months ago. Even when they won their Premierships, these were based on a defensive-first philosophy which would have bored even the most ardent Leg supporters. Now they have been given license to run and gun and stun, and are playing without fear of making errors.
2018 is their Premiership to lose ;)

PS.... why are Grigg and Panos not seen as AFL players? Grigg is like a man amongst boys at SANFL level whilst Panos is a Pendlebury clone who kicks more goals … whats not to like?
Spargo
Coach
Posts: 17680
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2012 5:12 pm
Team: Glenelg
Team: North Melbourne
Team: Sacred Heart OC
Location: Getting out of Dodge
Has thanked: 6416 times
Been thanked: 5688 times
Contact:

Re: Norwood v WWT Fri 1920

Post by Spargo »

Aerie wrote:
Jim05 wrote:
mal wrote:Been told a Gold Coast observer watched this game
Should he be recommending to draft number 16 for Norwood ?

They are there to see number 14 and a couple of mature age players


And maybe Lukosius...


I would’ve thought. You Norwood lot are as arrogant as they come :lol:
2017 safooty NFL tipping champ
2024 champ, Spargo’s Good Friday Cup @ Ascot

Time to get moving…
User avatar
SABRE
Reserves
Posts: 911
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 8:24 pm
Team: Norwood
Location: Beyond Redemption
Been thanked: 44 times
Contact:

Re: Norwood v WWT Fri 1920

Post by SABRE »

northerner wrote:
wedgetail wrote:Norwood put on a clinic after 1/4 time. Too physically big and strong, quick, skilful ball movement, attractive brand of footy.
Premiership favs without doubt.


That's what I noticed when the Legs belted us at the Parade a couple of months ago. Even when they won their Premierships, these were based on a defensive-first philosophy which would have bored even the most ardent Leg supporters. Now they have been given license to run and gun and stun, and are playing without fear of making errors.
2018 is their Premiership to lose ;)

PS.... why are Grigg and Panos not seen as AFL players? Grigg is like a man amongst boys at
SANFL level whilst Panos is a Pendlebury clone who kicks more goals … whats not to like?


:-S
Dearest 'northerner',
Your outrageously accurate appraisal is most annoying.
Will you please shut the f**k up before we lose what's taken 3 years to build ?
A quick 'whip-around' within the Cheer/Grog Squad has raised $1,369.50 to get you to delete your post before AFL
a*******s see it and destroy us yet again. Please stop being so candid mate. We want another dynasty just like you had.
Is that asking too much? Please, please mate, we're begging you. Stop telling the truth !!!
[-o<
Luv,
Sabre.

p.s. Pendlebury??? Surely Matty Panos is far more like Robbie Flower !!!
:YMSMUG:
Last edited by SABRE on Tue Jul 31, 2018 12:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
NFC 2021
Jim05
Coach
Posts: 49466
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 8:33 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Essendon
Team: South Gawler
Has thanked: 1137 times
Been thanked: 4041 times
Contact:

Re: Norwood v WWT Fri 1920

Post by Jim05 »

Spargo wrote:
Aerie wrote:
Jim05 wrote:
mal wrote:Been told a Gold Coast observer watched this game
Should he be recommending to draft number 16 for Norwood ?

They are there to see number 14 and a couple of mature age players


And maybe Lukosius...


I would’ve thought. You Norwood lot are as arrogant as they come :lol:

They have seen plenty of him and like all clubs would rate him highly. I was definitely told they were going to state leagues to check out mature players for their later picks as they need to get some bigger bodies and nouse in there. For clubs at the bottom of the ladder their later picks and mature agers are often the difference
User avatar
stan
Coach
Posts: 15668
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:23 am
Team: Norwood
Team: West Coast Eagles
Team: Goodwood Saints
Location: North Eastern Suburbs
Has thanked: 88 times
Been thanked: 1332 times
Contact:

Re: Norwood v WWT Fri 1920

Post by stan »

Jim05 wrote:
Spargo wrote:
Aerie wrote:
Jim05 wrote:[quote="mal"]Been told a Gold Coast observer watched this game
Should he be recommending to draft number 16 for Norwood ?

They are there to see number 14 and a couple of mature age players


And maybe Lukosius...


I would’ve thought. You Norwood lot are as arrogant as they come [emoji38]

They have seen plenty of him and like all clubs would rate him highly. I was definitely told they were going to state leagues to check out mature players for their later picks as they need to get some bigger bodies and nouse in there. For clubs at the bottom of the ladder their later picks and mature agers are often the difference[/quote]This may end up frustrating if say we lost a Grigg or Panos type of player due to the Gold Coast being a massive shit factory.

Looking forward to the rape and pillage.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
User avatar
JK
Coach
Posts: 37469
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:41 am
Team: Norwood
Team: SMOSH West Lakes
Location: Coopers Hill
Has thanked: 4509 times
Been thanked: 3028 times
Contact:

Re: Norwood v WWT Fri 1920

Post by JK »

Much sooner lose them (and any other player) interstate rather than locally
FUSC
User avatar
goddy11
League Bench Warmer
Posts: 1368
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2014 5:05 pm
Team: Eagles
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Myponga-Sellicks
Has thanked: 678 times
Been thanked: 221 times
Contact:

Re: Norwood v WWT Fri 1920

Post by goddy11 »

JK wrote:Much sooner lose them (and any other player) interstate rather than locally


Can you not just match what the AFL side have to offer and keep them here. Money not an issue. :D
northerner
League Bench Warmer
Posts: 1294
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2017 4:18 pm
Team: Central District
Team: Eastern Park
Has thanked: 295 times
Been thanked: 573 times
Contact:

Re: Norwood v WWT Fri 1920

Post by northerner »

stan wrote:This may end up frustrating if say we lost a Grigg or Panos type of player due to the Gold Coast being a massive shit factory.

Looking forward to the rape and pillage.


Been there done that... Nick Holman. Ouch!
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 298 guests