State of the game

Talk on the national game
Post Reply
User avatar
Lightning McQueen
Coach
Posts: 55280
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 9:43 am
Location: Radiator Springs
Has thanked: 4976 times
Been thanked: 9056 times
Contact:

Re: State of the game

Post by Lightning McQueen »

JK wrote:
Miss those days when opponents didnt act like best mates
and protected themselves rather than relying on the rules to do it for them.

Great umpiring at the start too, all it took was the ump to bounce the ball and the blue was over.


Probably because the whole team was related.


I can't believe no one was seriously injured, there were some big hits thrown. I'm not sure what I'd do if I was umpiring and something like that broke out in this day and age.
HOGG SHIELD DIVISION V WINNER 2018.
User avatar
Booney
Coach
Posts: 64107
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:47 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Location: Alberton proud
Has thanked: 8792 times
Been thanked: 12735 times
Contact:

Re: State of the game

Post by Booney »

Gil wants to trial rules in season, yeah?

What happened to Dean Bailey when he brought the game into disrepute?
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
westozfalcon
League Bench Warmer
Posts: 1082
Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 10:30 pm
Team: South Adelaide
Team: Brisbane Lions
Location: Perth WA
Has thanked: 113 times
Been thanked: 28 times
Contact:

Re: State of the game

Post by westozfalcon »

A good rule to introduce for stopping congestion is one that applies in Australia v Ireland International Rules games i.e if a player is on the ground he can't grab the ball, he must punch or tap it away. This would stop players diving on the footy which in turn leads to the formation of packs.
tigerpie
Coach
Posts: 5098
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2011 1:00 pm
Team: Glenelg
Team: Collingwood
Has thanked: 651 times
Been thanked: 529 times
Contact:

Re: State of the game

Post by tigerpie »

How many times does the player know he's had no prior opportunity so just absorbs the tackle without really trying to dispose of it?
Maybe if you are caught with the ball regardless of prior opportunity its holding the ball.
That'll do 2 things...reward a solid tackle and, the players will tend to tap it into space releasing a runner. Ala Cyril.
Just a thought.
whufc
Coach
Posts: 29217
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 9:56 am
Team: Central District
Team: BSR
Location: Blakeview
Has thanked: 6065 times
Been thanked: 2933 times
Contact:

Re: State of the game

Post by whufc »

Booney wrote:Gil wants to trial rules in season, yeah?

What happened to Dean Bailey when he brought the game into disrepute?


Agree, surely that's what the pre-season is for where I think it is perfectly acceptable to trial new rules. (not that I agree with constant rule changes)
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
woodublieve12
Coach
Posts: 17954
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 5:48 pm
Team: Glenelg
Team: Sydney Swans
Has thanked: 3236 times
Been thanked: 2578 times
Contact:

Re: State of the game

Post by woodublieve12 »

My thoughts on the rules committee

Image
"Be curious, not judgmental""
User avatar
bennymacca
Coach
Posts: 15028
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 11:22 am
Team: Central District
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Freeling
Has thanked: 2253 times
Been thanked: 1803 times
Contact:

Re: State of the game

Post by bennymacca »

HH3 wrote:
bennymacca wrote:
HH3 wrote:Haven't watched a game in years. Probably won't watch one ever again. This is laughable at best.


You haven’t watched an afl game in years?!?!?


Nope. I've seen bits and pieces, but I can't sit through a whole quarter anymore. Once a blatant holding the ball call is let go, I can't watch.

Also, the commentary annoys the f**k out of me.

I like the sport. Not how it's umpired or broadcast.


How can you possibly comment on the game or any team any more, let alone the team you supposedly support.

At least WHUFC has never claimed to be an AFL fan
User avatar
Footy Smart
Coach
Posts: 5088
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 12:16 pm
Team: Sturt
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Modbury
Has thanked: 54 times
Been thanked: 118 times
Contact:

Re: State of the game

Post by Footy Smart »

Interesting comments from Alan Richardson who trialed some of the rule changes at training with AFL umpires and overseen by Hocking. He said that throwing the ball up quickly made it worse as players couldn’t clear the pack and re position
User avatar
HH3
Coach
Posts: 11643
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 2:14 pm
Team: North Melbourne
Team: North Haven
Has thanked: 3301 times
Been thanked: 2433 times
Contact:

Re: State of the game

Post by HH3 »

bennymacca wrote:
HH3 wrote:
bennymacca wrote:
HH3 wrote:Haven't watched a game in years. Probably won't watch one ever again. This is laughable at best.


You haven’t watched an afl game in years?!?!?


Nope. I've seen bits and pieces, but I can't sit through a whole quarter anymore. Once a blatant holding the ball call is let go, I can't watch.

Also, the commentary annoys the f**k out of me.

I like the sport. Not how it's umpired or broadcast.


How can you possibly comment on the game or any team any more, let alone the team you supposedly support.

At least WHUFC has never claimed to be an AFL fan


:lol:
I TOLD YOU SO

2013/14 NFL Tipping Comp Champion
Senor Moto Gadili
Veteran
Posts: 3645
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 3:52 pm
Team: North Adelaide
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Has thanked: 206 times
Been thanked: 540 times
Contact:

Re: State of the game

Post by Senor Moto Gadili »

Footy Smart wrote:Interesting comments from Alan Richardson who trialed some of the rule changes at training with AFL umpires and overseen by Hocking. He said that throwing the ball up quickly made it worse as players couldn’t clear the pack and re position

I heard that quote and it made absolutely no sense.
User avatar
Footy Smart
Coach
Posts: 5088
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 12:16 pm
Team: Sturt
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Modbury
Has thanked: 54 times
Been thanked: 118 times
Contact:

Re: State of the game

Post by Footy Smart »

Senor Moto Gadili wrote:
Footy Smart wrote:Interesting comments from Alan Richardson who trialed some of the rule changes at training with AFL umpires and overseen by Hocking. He said that throwing the ball up quickly made it worse as players couldn’t clear the pack and re position

I heard that quote and it made absolutely no sense.


no sense? he didnt say every stoppage, but stoppages with high numbers around the ball meant they didnt end up having time to leave the contested area and then are likely to enter the play/contest again. The result of the change is that nothing improves or changes.
woodublieve12
Coach
Posts: 17954
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 5:48 pm
Team: Glenelg
Team: Sydney Swans
Has thanked: 3236 times
Been thanked: 2578 times
Contact:

Re: State of the game

Post by woodublieve12 »

HH3 wrote:
bennymacca wrote:How can you possibly comment on the game or any team any more, let alone the team you supposedly support.

At least WHUFC has never claimed to be an AFL fan


:lol:

grow up HH3...
"Be curious, not judgmental""
mighty_tiger_79
Coach
Posts: 62506
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:29 pm
Team: Geelong
Location: at the TAB
Has thanked: 14199 times
Been thanked: 5168 times
Contact:

Re: State of the game

Post by mighty_tiger_79 »

Footy Smart wrote:Interesting comments from Alan Richardson who trialed some of the rule changes at training with AFL umpires and overseen by Hocking. He said that throwing the ball up quickly made it worse as players couldn’t clear the pack and re position

Not sure that was an issue before. Players seemed to clear the ball out pretty well
Matty Wade is a star and deserves more respect from the forum family!
User avatar
Footy Smart
Coach
Posts: 5088
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 12:16 pm
Team: Sturt
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Modbury
Has thanked: 54 times
Been thanked: 118 times
Contact:

Re: State of the game

Post by Footy Smart »

mighty_tiger_79 wrote:
Footy Smart wrote:Interesting comments from Alan Richardson who trialed some of the rule changes at training with AFL umpires and overseen by Hocking. He said that throwing the ball up quickly made it worse as players couldn’t clear the pack and re position

Not sure that was an issue before. Players seemed to clear the ball out pretty well


its aim is to speed play up and reduce congestion supposedly. Im not saying either way as i havent seen it play out, but it shows that there is always un intended consequences in change and that there i need for lengthy testing.
mighty_tiger_79
Coach
Posts: 62506
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:29 pm
Team: Geelong
Location: at the TAB
Has thanked: 14199 times
Been thanked: 5168 times
Contact:

Re: State of the game

Post by mighty_tiger_79 »

Footy Smart wrote:
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:
Footy Smart wrote:Interesting comments from Alan Richardson who trialed some of the rule changes at training with AFL umpires and overseen by Hocking. He said that throwing the ball up quickly made it worse as players couldn’t clear the pack and re position

Not sure that was an issue before. Players seemed to clear the ball out pretty well


its aim is to speed play up and reduce congestion supposedly. Im not saying either way as i havent seen it play out, but it shows that there is always un intended consequences in change and that there i need for lengthy testing.
Watching a replay recently of the SOO from '94 v Vics at Footy Park.
Boundary throw-ins and ball ups around the ground, saw the Umps just grab the ball and get the ball back in play regardless of who was around.
That kept the ball/game moving
Less congestion around the ball.
The ball was cleared out of these situations easily.

The AFL just like ******* things up.
The game naturally evolves, but the AFL feel the need to artificially manufacture results.

If only someone in there got rid of:
A) ruck noms
B)below the knee rubbish
C) pay holding the ball/incorrect disposal. The AFL looks more like Union at the moment.
D) reduce the Chopping Arm rule for blatant offences.
E) reward tackler, not those that dive forward when there is the faintest touch on the back.


Thats just to start with....

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk
Matty Wade is a star and deserves more respect from the forum family!
Senor Moto Gadili
Veteran
Posts: 3645
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 3:52 pm
Team: North Adelaide
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Has thanked: 206 times
Been thanked: 540 times
Contact:

Re: State of the game

Post by Senor Moto Gadili »

Footy Smart wrote:
Senor Moto Gadili wrote:
Footy Smart wrote:Interesting comments from Alan Richardson who trialed some of the rule changes at training with AFL umpires and overseen by Hocking. He said that throwing the ball up quickly made it worse as players couldn’t clear the pack and re position

I heard that quote and it made absolutely no sense.


no sense? he didnt say every stoppage, but stoppages with high numbers around the ball meant they didnt end up having time to leave the contested area and then are likely to enter the play/contest again. The result of the change is that nothing improves or changes.

The trial consisted of the following components;

Starting positions for ball ups in centre - 6:6:6
No prior opportunity
A line drawn through the centre of the ground and at every stoppage each team had to have at least two players on the attacking side of the line
Making the goal square twice as long - i.e. 18 m in lieu of 9m

This is what Alan Richardson said...

"Given that there were so many stoppages and so many ball-ups because there was no prior opportunity, and the way that was adjudicated was to be a ball-up, there was a lot of ball-ups," Richardson said.

"Then, when the umpires were really committed to throwing the ball up quickly, players just couldn't clear the area, so I think there'll be a lot that the AFL get out of that in terms of perhaps what not to do as opposed to, 'Yeah, that's a good look for us'."

So, I'm still not sure what point he is trying to make. I assume it is a criticism of applying zones at stoppages more so than any criticism of umpires throwing the ball up quickly at stoppages.
User avatar
goddy11
League Bench Warmer
Posts: 1368
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2014 4:35 pm
Team: Eagles
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Myponga-Sellicks
Has thanked: 677 times
Been thanked: 221 times
Contact:

Re: State of the game

Post by goddy11 »

Senor Moto Gadili wrote:
Footy Smart wrote:Interesting comments from Alan Richardson who trialed some of the rule changes at training with AFL umpires and overseen by Hocking. He said that throwing the ball up quickly made it worse as players couldn’t clear the pack and re position

I heard that quote and it made absolutely no sense.

My thoughts as well. I would have thought players could not get into defensive positions as quick. Maybe its the Saints are too slow to clear the ball.
woodublieve12
Coach
Posts: 17954
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 5:48 pm
Team: Glenelg
Team: Sydney Swans
Has thanked: 3236 times
Been thanked: 2578 times
Contact:

Re: State of the game

Post by woodublieve12 »

This is for all those proposed rule changes above

Image
"Be curious, not judgmental""
whufc
Coach
Posts: 29217
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 9:56 am
Team: Central District
Team: BSR
Location: Blakeview
Has thanked: 6065 times
Been thanked: 2933 times
Contact:

Re: State of the game

Post by whufc »

mighty_tiger_79 wrote:
Footy Smart wrote:
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:
Footy Smart wrote:Interesting comments from Alan Richardson who trialed some of the rule changes at training with AFL umpires and overseen by Hocking. He said that throwing the ball up quickly made it worse as players couldn’t clear the pack and re position

Not sure that was an issue before. Players seemed to clear the ball out pretty well


its aim is to speed play up and reduce congestion supposedly. Im not saying either way as i havent seen it play out, but it shows that there is always un intended consequences in change and that there i need for lengthy testing.
Watching a replay recently of the SOO from '94 v Vics at Footy Park.
Boundary throw-ins and ball ups around the ground, saw the Umps just grab the ball and get the ball back in play regardless of who was around.
That kept the ball/game moving
Less congestion around the ball.
The ball was cleared out of these situations easily.

The AFL just like ******* things up.
The game naturally evolves, but the AFL feel the need to artificially manufacture results.

If only someone in there got rid of:
A) ruck noms
B)below the knee rubbish
C) pay holding the ball/incorrect disposal. The AFL looks more like Union at the moment.
D) reduce the Chopping Arm rule for blatant offences.
E) reward tackler, not those that dive forward when there is the faintest touch on the back.


Thats just to start with....

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk


Wash your mouth, don’t discredit union like that, we are not allowed to knock the ball on.
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
whufc
Coach
Posts: 29217
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 9:56 am
Team: Central District
Team: BSR
Location: Blakeview
Has thanked: 6065 times
Been thanked: 2933 times
Contact:

Re: State of the game

Post by whufc »

goddy11 wrote:
Senor Moto Gadili wrote:
Footy Smart wrote:Interesting comments from Alan Richardson who trialed some of the rule changes at training with AFL umpires and overseen by Hocking. He said that throwing the ball up quickly made it worse as players couldn’t clear the pack and re position

I heard that quote and it made absolutely no sense.

My thoughts as well. I would have thought players could not get into defensive positions as quick. Maybe its the Saints are too slow to clear the ball.


I think what he was saying was that teams rely on structure and set plays to win the ball from balls up

By throwing the ball up quicker players could not get into a structured position meaning ruckman were not able to get hit outs to advantage and were nearly tapping the ball to what was still a 50/50 contest meaning the ball wasn’t cleared.
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 196 guests