by Rik E Boy » Sat May 05, 2018 7:05 pm
by JK » Sat May 05, 2018 7:10 pm
by Rik E Boy » Sat May 05, 2018 7:17 pm
JK wrote:Sub-standard skills a bigger problem than the congestion imho
by daysofourlives » Sat May 05, 2018 7:24 pm
JK wrote:Sub-standard skills a bigger problem than the congestion imho
by Jim05 » Sat May 05, 2018 7:34 pm
Rik E Boy wrote:JK wrote:Sub-standard skills a bigger problem than the congestion imho
Spot on mate. Two teams too many. Essendon the worst in the league at the moment.
regards,
REB
by heater31 » Sat May 05, 2018 7:49 pm
by LMA » Sat May 05, 2018 8:23 pm
heater31 wrote:Would adopting the SANFL out of bounds rules fix all of this?
Believe the AFL have been keeping an eye on the data.
by JK » Sat May 05, 2018 8:24 pm
daysofourlives wrote:JK wrote:Sub-standard skills a bigger problem than the congestion imho
Yeah the skills arent fantastic but i think we under estimate the pressure the players are under and the margin for error is so small in todays passing when picking your way through zones. Im more with Chirs Scott than Garry Lyon on this issue.
We have to reduce conjestion anyway we can, all 36 players within 60-70 m is just crap football and you expect them to find a target or make some space.
by mighty_tiger_79 » Sat May 05, 2018 8:38 pm
Rik E Boy wrote:JK wrote:Sub-standard skills a bigger problem than the congestion imho
Spot on mate. Two teams too many. Essendon the worst in the league at the moment.
regards,
REB
by Spargo » Sun May 06, 2018 12:01 am
by daysofourlives » Sun May 06, 2018 12:53 am
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:Rik E Boy wrote:JK wrote:Sub-standard skills a bigger problem than the congestion imho
Spot on mate. Two teams too many. Essendon the worst in the league at the moment.
regards,
REB
Carlton say hi
by Booney » Mon May 07, 2018 9:16 am
by FlyingHigh » Mon May 07, 2018 12:02 pm
LMA wrote:Chopping the arms needs to go, need to promote strong hands in the contest again. I also don't like players getting pinged for putting hands in the back to hold their ground, stronger players are getting penalised. The 50m for entering a protected area MUST go, ridiculously harsh penalty. Whatever changes are made if any, take as much grey area interpretation away from the umps as possible
by Dutchy » Mon May 07, 2018 1:16 pm
heater31 wrote:Would adopting the SANFL out of bounds rules fix all of this?
Believe the AFL have been keeping an eye on the data.
by whufc » Mon May 07, 2018 8:24 pm
Dutchy wrote:heater31 wrote:Would adopting the SANFL out of bounds rules fix all of this?
Believe the AFL have been keeping an eye on the data.
We have been using it in the SFL this year, even in the juniors, and its not as bad as I thought it would be. Instead of a short throw in into congestion you have a 40-60m kick to a target or space.
by heater31 » Mon May 07, 2018 9:04 pm
Cut off the 45 and cover the spread and they wont have an option but to go down the line.whufc wrote:Dutchy wrote:heater31 wrote:Would adopting the SANFL out of bounds rules fix all of this?
Believe the AFL have been keeping an eye on the data.
We have been using it in the SFL this year, even in the juniors, and its not as bad as I thought it would be. Instead of a short throw in into congestion you have a 40-60m kick to a target or space.
While I agree with what your saying I think at AFL the tactic will be a bit different and teams will look to slingshot to the other side, go backwards etc. I don't think to many teams at AFL will potentially give the ball back by kicking to a contest 40-60m up the ground.
by whufc » Mon May 07, 2018 9:21 pm
heater31 wrote:Cut off the 45 and cover the spread and they wont have an option but to go down the line.whufc wrote:Dutchy wrote:heater31 wrote:Would adopting the SANFL out of bounds rules fix all of this?
Believe the AFL have been keeping an eye on the data.
We have been using it in the SFL this year, even in the juniors, and its not as bad as I thought it would be. Instead of a short throw in into congestion you have a 40-60m kick to a target or space.
While I agree with what your saying I think at AFL the tactic will be a bit different and teams will look to slingshot to the other side, go backwards etc. I don't think to many teams at AFL will potentially give the ball back by kicking to a contest 40-60m up the ground.
by daysofourlives » Fri May 18, 2018 3:35 pm
by Lightning McQueen » Fri May 18, 2018 3:44 pm
daysofourlives wrote:Loved Chris Judds suggestion of scrapping percentage. He wants to just have points for counted. Would promote heavier scoring in some respects. Obviously coaches would still put 4 points first but we might find a better balance between attack and defence
by daysofourlives » Fri May 18, 2018 3:48 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:daysofourlives wrote:Loved Chris Judds suggestion of scrapping percentage. He wants to just have points for counted. Would promote heavier scoring in some respects. Obviously coaches would still put 4 points first but we might find a better balance between attack and defence
I think it would have a negative affect, once a team can't win they will call "uncle" and get smashed. End up with 14 on the field to minimize injury risk.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |