by jo172 » Wed Apr 25, 2018 5:30 pm
by Senor Moto Gadili » Thu Apr 26, 2018 9:56 am
jo172 wrote:8? For striking? That seems on the high scale?
by S Demon » Fri Apr 27, 2018 1:56 pm
Senor Moto Gadili wrote:jo172 wrote:8? For striking? That seems on the high scale?
It does, but they have obviously graded it as intentional, so it would be within the guidelines. I assume it has been graded as one of the following....
Striking - Intentional/Severe Impact/High = 8 to 10 games
Striking - Intentional/High Impact/High = 6 to 8 games
The Goody Saints player left the field and didn't return. I hope he is OK and doesn't miss any footy.
by Love a rumour » Fri Apr 27, 2018 9:46 pm
by jo172 » Sat Apr 28, 2018 1:25 pm
by Senor Moto Gadili » Sat Apr 28, 2018 5:50 pm
by teamdefense2017 » Sun Apr 29, 2018 12:11 pm
by jo172 » Tue May 01, 2018 3:55 pm
by Footy Chick » Tue May 01, 2018 4:11 pm
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by jo172 » Wed May 02, 2018 10:56 am
by Lightning McQueen » Wed May 02, 2018 11:10 am
jo172 wrote:https://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/watch-suburban-player-with-ankle-bracelet-breaks-opponents-jaw-behind-play/news-story/0f3ac1df21454f02a4d753c4d51aa814
Looks like the Victorians have higher standards than our tribunal, automatic 16 games and Australia wide de-registration for this elbow.
This might be the wrong thread for it, but what are people's thoughts regarding automatic 12 week deregistering suspensions for intentional, high, severe, off-ball hits?
I tend to think it's 2018, people should know better now, why bother with second chances?
by Footy Chick » Wed May 02, 2018 11:26 am
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by Down the Hill » Wed May 02, 2018 11:48 am
jo172 wrote:https://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/watch-suburban-player-with-ankle-bracelet-breaks-opponents-jaw-behind-play/news-story/0f3ac1df21454f02a4d753c4d51aa814
Looks like the Victorians have higher standards than our tribunal, automatic 16 games and Australia wide de-registration for this elbow.
This might be the wrong thread for it, but what are people's thoughts regarding automatic 12 week deregistering suspensions for intentional, high, severe, off-ball hits?
I tend to think it's 2018, people should know better now, why bother with second chances?
by jo172 » Wed May 02, 2018 11:53 am
Down the Hill wrote:jo172 wrote:https://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/watch-suburban-player-with-ankle-bracelet-breaks-opponents-jaw-behind-play/news-story/0f3ac1df21454f02a4d753c4d51aa814
Looks like the Victorians have higher standards than our tribunal, automatic 16 games and Australia wide de-registration for this elbow.
This might be the wrong thread for it, but what are people's thoughts regarding automatic 12 week deregistering suspensions for intentional, high, severe, off-ball hits?
I tend to think it's 2018, people should know better now, why bother with second chances?
Bit harsh on our leagues tribunal jo172. I think we all agree that they have handed out penalties in recent years on the harsher end of the scale compared to previous standards but that we all applaud their stance. Assuming first offence for the TTG player then 8 games seems about right considering it was a concussion injury and no broken face. A fair chance that Victorian bloke had a previous record which may have contributed to dishing out 16 games plus a weekend in hospital with a badly broken jaw for the victim probably means the incident was worth double the penalty.
by Footy Chick » Wed May 02, 2018 12:22 pm
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by jo172 » Wed May 02, 2018 12:28 pm
Footy Chick wrote:That also has it's dangers and do automatically ban someone, you'd need to come in with undeniable proof I'd think - rather than banishing someone based on almost heresay,
by Q. » Wed May 02, 2018 12:54 pm
by Look Good In Leather » Wed May 02, 2018 12:56 pm
jo172 wrote:Footy Chick wrote:That also has it's dangers and do automatically ban someone, you'd need to come in with undeniable proof I'd think - rather than banishing someone based on almost heresay,
When you have the act on video it's a pretty bloody good start.
Hell, when two people are down one end of the field in 100 metres of space and one ends up unconscious or serverely injured it's a pretty good start.
by jo172 » Wed May 02, 2018 1:04 pm
Look Good In Leather wrote:jo172 wrote:Footy Chick wrote:That also has it's dangers and do automatically ban someone, you'd need to come in with undeniable proof I'd think - rather than banishing someone based on almost heresay,
When you have the act on video it's a pretty bloody good start.
Hell, when two people are down one end of the field in 100 metres of space and one ends up unconscious or serverely injured it's a pretty good start.
Whilst the footage was damning, there is nothing showing any events leading up to the incident. Could be a retaliation incident?
by Executive Member » Wed May 02, 2018 1:15 pm
jo172 wrote:Look Good In Leather wrote:jo172 wrote:Footy Chick wrote:That also has it's dangers and do automatically ban someone, you'd need to come in with undeniable proof I'd think - rather than banishing someone based on almost heresay,
When you have the act on video it's a pretty bloody good start.
Hell, when two people are down one end of the field in 100 metres of space and one ends up unconscious or serverely injured it's a pretty good start.
Whilst the footage was damning, there is nothing showing any events leading up to the incident. Could be a retaliation incident?
I very much do not subscribe to any two wrongs make a right view.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |