The South Australian Political Landscape

Labor, Liberal, Greens, Democrats? Here's the place to discuss.
Post Reply
User avatar
Jimmy_041
Coach
Posts: 15660
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 6:00 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Collingwood
Team: Port District
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by Jimmy_041 »

morell wrote:What deceit? They saw some plans, didn't like them.

You want them to release and tacitly endorse plans they don't actually support?


Former Veterans Affairs Minister Martin Hamilton Smith this morning admitted he believed the Labor Government kept the plans under wraps “because the government didn’t like it (the plans) at all”.


I can see why you don't think its deceit
They kept their plans for the Repat and Noarlunga quiet until after the 2 by-elections last time
dedja: Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
jo172
Veteran
Posts: 3602
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 5:30 pm
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by jo172 »

morell wrote:What deceit? They saw some plans, didn't like them.

You want them to release and tacitly endorse plans they don't actually support?


But for allowing the sale of the Hospital and DPA to make the plans possible/feasible.

They didn't have to like the plans but their policy positions undoubtedly created the underlying situation that led to the Plans.

Hamilton-Smith and Labor can hardly wash their hands and say nothing to do with us.
User avatar
Jimmy_041
Coach
Posts: 15660
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 6:00 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Collingwood
Team: Port District
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by Jimmy_041 »

jo172 wrote:
morell wrote:What deceit? They saw some plans, didn't like them.

You want them to release and tacitly endorse plans they don't actually support?


But for allowing the sale of the Hospital and DPA to make the plans possible/feasible.

They didn't have to like the plans but their policy positions undoubtedly created the underlying situation that led to the Plans.

Hamilton-Smith and Labor can hardly wash their hands and say nothing to do with us.


Or maybe release them and say they don't support them
But that would be like releasing other information like, say, cabinet documents to show when you knew about Oakden, or a safety report for nRAH
How fortunate we were that Gillman went to the Supreme Court so we could all see the lies told to us
dedja: Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
User avatar
heater31
Moderator
Posts: 16794
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 2:12 am
Team: Sturt
Location: the back blocks
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by heater31 »

4 Department chiefs told to clean out their desks this morning.
User avatar
Jimmy_041
Coach
Posts: 15660
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 6:00 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Collingwood
Team: Port District
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by Jimmy_041 »

heater31 wrote:4 Department chiefs told to clean out their desks this morning.


Do you reckon this bloke might be $hitting himself?

Image
dedja: Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
User avatar
morell
Coach
Posts: 6466
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 9:26 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Team: Mitchell Park
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by morell »

If not releasing plans before they're ready or you're happy with them is deceitful than I've been deceitful my entire career in the public service. As has every Government, ever.
jo172
Veteran
Posts: 3602
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 5:30 pm
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by jo172 »

morell wrote:If not releasing plans before they're ready or you're happy with them is deceitful than I've been deceitful my entire career in the public service. As has every Government, ever.


Morrell, they were the developers plans, not the governments.

They were clearly held under wraps for the sole purpose of not further alienating opponents of the sale of the Repat.
User avatar
Booney
Coach
Posts: 64099
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:17 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Location: Alberton proud
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by Booney »

There's been a noticeable shift in people's defence/offence strategies in this thread since last Saturday night.

Been interesting to watch.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
User avatar
morell
Coach
Posts: 6466
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 9:26 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Team: Mitchell Park
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by morell »

jo172 wrote:
morell wrote:If not releasing plans before they're ready or you're happy with them is deceitful than I've been deceitful my entire career in the public service. As has every Government, ever.


Morrell, they were the developers plans, not the governments.

They were clearly held under wraps for the sole purpose of not further alienating opponents of the sale of the Repat.

Well if they were the developers plans, what responsibility does the Government have to release them?

More than likely the Government contracted a consultant to prepare a master plan? The process for that is iterative in nature. It's not about being deceitful, it's about ensuring peoples wants and needs are considered.
User avatar
morell
Coach
Posts: 6466
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 9:26 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Team: Mitchell Park
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by morell »

Jimmy_041 wrote:
jo172 wrote:
morell wrote:What deceit? They saw some plans, didn't like them.

You want them to release and tacitly endorse plans they don't actually support?


But for allowing the sale of the Hospital and DPA to make the plans possible/feasible.

They didn't have to like the plans but their policy positions undoubtedly created the underlying situation that led to the Plans.

Hamilton-Smith and Labor can hardly wash their hands and say nothing to do with us.


Or maybe release them and say they don't support them
and if they did that they'd be naive in the extreme. And foolish.

Have you been involved in the public consultation space before?
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
Posts: 20533
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:34 pm
Team: Glenelg
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by am Bays »

Booney wrote:There's been a noticeable shift in people's defence/offence strategies in this thread since last Saturday night.

Been interesting to watch.

Best explanation I can come up with is: Glasnost
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
User avatar
Jimmy_041
Coach
Posts: 15660
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 6:00 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Collingwood
Team: Port District
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by Jimmy_041 »

morell wrote:
Jimmy_041 wrote:
jo172 wrote:
morell wrote:What deceit? They saw some plans, didn't like them.

You want them to release and tacitly endorse plans they don't actually support?


But for allowing the sale of the Hospital and DPA to make the plans possible/feasible.

They didn't have to like the plans but their policy positions undoubtedly created the underlying situation that led to the Plans.

Hamilton-Smith and Labor can hardly wash their hands and say nothing to do with us.


Or maybe release them and say they don't support them
and if they did that they'd be naive in the extreme. And foolish.

Have you been involved in the public consultation space before?


Yes, but I wasn't involved in this one:

https://www.sa.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf ... al-DPA.pdf

So, the Development Plan was changed to allow a wider range of uses for the new owners.
Very convenient. Probably doubled or tripled the price.
Who would have thought we would end up with what they are proposing now? :-k

ACH Group’s vision for renewal of the Repat includes an exciting mixed-use site for the whole community (included but not limited to):
• health and aged care services, including transition care and day hospital services
• both inpatient and outpatient services
• education and training facilities
• accommodation with an emphasis towards supporting the needs of aged persons, retirement living, Veterans, disability and students
• a research and innovation hub
• open, green spaces, gardens and cafes that will be available for the whole community to use
• continued community use of the hydrotherapy pool
• veterans’ services; and
• allied health services including medical imaging, pathology, podiatry, and pharmacy.


Very LTO like. Allow the new owners access to the data and, bingo; 4x the price

But nothing to do with the government is it?????
dedja: Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
Posts: 20533
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:34 pm
Team: Glenelg
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by am Bays »

jo172 wrote:Re Mawson if you take Antony Green's word for it most of the remaining votes to count are declarations rather than postals and as such are unlikely to skew Liberal to the same extent as the postals.

Inside word is that of the 1000 odd absentee votes counted today Biggles has done the best
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
jo172
Veteran
Posts: 3602
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 5:30 pm
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by jo172 »

am Bays wrote:
jo172 wrote:Re Mawson if you take Antony Green's word for it most of the remaining votes to count are declarations rather than postals and as such are unlikely to skew Liberal to the same extent as the postals.

Inside word is that of the 1000 odd absentee votes counted today Biggles has done the best


Electoral Commission has his lead back to 198 votes.
User avatar
morell
Coach
Posts: 6466
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 9:26 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Team: Mitchell Park
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by morell »

Jimmy_041 wrote:
morell wrote:
Jimmy_041 wrote:
jo172 wrote:But for allowing the sale of the Hospital and DPA to make the plans possible/feasible.

They didn't have to like the plans but their policy positions undoubtedly created the underlying situation that led to the Plans.

Hamilton-Smith and Labor can hardly wash their hands and say nothing to do with us.


Or maybe release them and say they don't support them
and if they did that they'd be naive in the extreme. And foolish.

Have you been involved in the public consultation space before?


Yes, but I wasn't involved in this one:

https://www.sa.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf ... al-DPA.pdf

So, the Development Plan was changed to allow a wider range of uses for the new owners.
Very convenient. Probably doubled or tripled the price.
Who would have thought we would end up with what they are proposing now? :-k

ACH Group’s vision for renewal of the Repat includes an exciting mixed-use site for the whole community (included but not limited to):
• health and aged care services, including transition care and day hospital services
• both inpatient and outpatient services
• education and training facilities
• accommodation with an emphasis towards supporting the needs of aged persons, retirement living, Veterans, disability and students
• a research and innovation hub
• open, green spaces, gardens and cafes that will be available for the whole community to use
• continued community use of the hydrotherapy pool
• veterans’ services; and
• allied health services including medical imaging, pathology, podiatry, and pharmacy.


Very LTO like. Allow the new owners access to the data and, bingo; 4x the price

But nothing to do with the government is it?????
It has everything to do with the Government. I just don't know what your actual problem is. Everything you've said is pretty much standard practice.
User avatar
Jimmy_041
Coach
Posts: 15660
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 6:00 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Collingwood
Team: Port District
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by Jimmy_041 »

morell wrote: It has everything to do with the Government. I just don't know what your actual problem is. Everything you've said is pretty much standard practice.


It certainly was
dedja: Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
User avatar
Jimmy_041
Coach
Posts: 15660
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 6:00 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Collingwood
Team: Port District
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by Jimmy_041 »

Booney wrote:
GWW wrote:Any thoughts on the ministry?

Chapman - Attorney General?

Lucas - Treasurer (confirmed)

Wingard - Transport?

Spiers - ?

?

?


Tarzia will be given something juicy as reward. Health or police?


How about Speaker? :shock:
Mind you, it wouldn’t be hard to do a better job
dedja: Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
jo172
Veteran
Posts: 3602
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 5:30 pm
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by jo172 »

Jimmy_041 wrote:
Booney wrote:
GWW wrote:Any thoughts on the ministry?

Chapman - Attorney General?

Lucas - Treasurer (confirmed)

Wingard - Transport?

Spiers - ?

?

?


Tarzia will be given something juicy as reward. Health or police?


How about Speaker? :shock:
Mind you, it wouldn’t be hard to do a better job


Well the test is not sending pornography to female legislators.

What the Labor Right will let people get away with in the name of holding power never ceases to amaze
User avatar
stan
Coach
Posts: 15668
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:23 am
Team: Norwood
Team: West Coast Eagles
Team: Goodwood Saints
Location: North Eastern Suburbs
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by stan »

jo172 wrote:
Jimmy_041 wrote:
Booney wrote:
GWW wrote:Any thoughts on the ministry?

Chapman - Attorney General?

Lucas - Treasurer (confirmed)

Wingard - Transport?

Spiers - ?

?

?


Tarzia will be given something juicy as reward. Health or police?


How about Speaker? :shock:
Mind you, it wouldn’t be hard to do a better job


Well the test is not sending pornography to female legislators.

What the Labor Right will let people get away with in the name of holding power never ceases to amaze


I don't know mate, I have seen some crazy stuff from all sides of politics to hold power. I think our pollies are all good and ethical until it affects there hold on power, then as you said it is amazing what they are allowed to get away with.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
User avatar
morell
Coach
Posts: 6466
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 9:26 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Team: Mitchell Park
Contact:

Re: The South Australian Political Landscape

Post by morell »

Jimmy_041 wrote:
morell wrote: It has everything to do with the Government. I just don't know what your actual problem is. Everything you've said is pretty much standard practice.


It certainly was
and will continue to be. No matter who is in power at the time, getting master plans right and suitable for public consumption before releasing them is going to continue.

Trust you will be calling the new Liberal Government deceitful when they do the exact same thing.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests