by MW » Fri Mar 16, 2018 12:19 pm
by Pseudo » Fri Mar 16, 2018 12:48 pm
MW wrote:I find it astounding that you want them out of the SANFL at any cost, yet want compensation for them playing in another league.
by Booney » Fri Mar 16, 2018 12:49 pm
MW wrote:I find it astounding that you want them out of the SANFL at any cost, yet want compensation for them playing in another league.
by UK Fan » Fri Mar 16, 2018 12:53 pm
MW wrote:I find it astounding that you want them out of the SANFL at any cost, yet want compensation for them playing in another league.
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by MW » Fri Mar 16, 2018 12:54 pm
Pseudo wrote:MW wrote:I find it astounding that you want them out of the SANFL at any cost, yet want compensation for them playing in another league.
How about compensation for breaking the 15-year contract?
Not that I would expect the tossrags at the SANFL to pursue any compensation in the event that the garbage actually did exit the league before the contract was complete.
by MW » Fri Mar 16, 2018 12:55 pm
UK Fan wrote:MW wrote:I find it astounding that you want them out of the SANFL at any cost, yet want compensation for them playing in another league.
Oh no a complete crows nerd finds it astounding I want to keep the afl accountable.
CGAF.
by Booney » Fri Mar 16, 2018 12:57 pm
Pseudo wrote:MW wrote:I find it astounding that you want them out of the SANFL at any cost, yet want compensation for them playing in another league.
How about compensation for breaking the 15-year contract?
by UK Fan » Fri Mar 16, 2018 12:58 pm
MW wrote:UK Fan wrote:MW wrote:I find it astounding that you want them out of the SANFL at any cost, yet want compensation for them playing in another league.
Oh no a complete crows nerd finds it astounding I want to keep the afl accountable.
CGAF.
accountable for removing themselves from a toxic environment that you don't want them in in the first place
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by Booney » Fri Mar 16, 2018 1:01 pm
by Pseudo » Fri Mar 16, 2018 1:03 pm
MW wrote:Pseudo wrote:MW wrote:I find it astounding that you want them out of the SANFL at any cost, yet want compensation for them playing in another league.
How about compensation for breaking the 15-year contract?
Not that I would expect the tossrags at the SANFL to pursue any compensation in the event that the garbage actually did exit the league before the contract was complete.
so let me see if I have this right...
1. You want them out of the SANFL at any cost
2. AFL are planning to get out of SANFL
3. You want compensation because they are breaking a 15 year contract
4. If they stay and honour the contract, revert back to step 1.
by Hazydog » Fri Mar 16, 2018 1:09 pm
Magellan wrote:beef wrote:Panther Pack wrote:The AFL was always going to introduce a reserves competition as some stage it was just a matter of when.
I'm excited that the SANFL will no longer have the AFL teams involved in the competition.
I think this is a great opportunity for the SANFL to once again market itself as its own league without AFL involvement and could potentially bring disgruntled supporters back to clubs.
Its the next generation that will kill off the SANFL. No one under 25 really follows it now unless they know someone playing. No port or crows will mean no interest from kids and now they can see their reserve players before the league game they have no reason to look at the sanfl. Where are top up players coming from or if they increase list size. Standard will drop then even less interest from younger fans
True point about the lack of kids' interest, although Port and Crows kids are not flocking to watch the up and coming players in the SANFL. This is ultimately a policy question for the SANFL and clubs to work out how and where to position itself. It's probably it's most challenging task going forward.
The SANFL comp may dissolve, weaken, or even die in time. So be it, better to die on its feet than live in its knees.
You know, there could even be spot available for Carlton to join the SANFL if they continue their perpetual lapse into irrelevance.
by Booney » Fri Mar 16, 2018 1:18 pm
Hazydog wrote:
Carlton no...Port Melbourne on the other hand...?? Seriously though, as good as this news is for the true SANFL fans, it raises the question of where does it leave the likes of Port Melbourne and the other one or two stand alone clubs currently in the VFL.
by Jim05 » Fri Mar 16, 2018 1:20 pm
Booney wrote:Hazydog wrote:
Carlton no...Port Melbourne on the other hand...?? Seriously though, as good as this news is for the true SANFL fans, it raises the question of where does it leave the likes of Port Melbourne and the other one or two stand alone clubs currently in the VFL.
Where does it leave the likes of Glenelg and West who could lose, immediately, $100k+ from their bottom line ( $50k from Adelaide and whatever they get from sponsors through the C7 deal ).
by Jim05 » Fri Mar 16, 2018 1:21 pm
Hazydog wrote:Magellan wrote:beef wrote:Panther Pack wrote:The AFL was always going to introduce a reserves competition as some stage it was just a matter of when.
I'm excited that the SANFL will no longer have the AFL teams involved in the competition.
I think this is a great opportunity for the SANFL to once again market itself as its own league without AFL involvement and could potentially bring disgruntled supporters back to clubs.
Its the next generation that will kill off the SANFL. No one under 25 really follows it now unless they know someone playing. No port or crows will mean no interest from kids and now they can see their reserve players before the league game they have no reason to look at the sanfl. Where are top up players coming from or if they increase list size. Standard will drop then even less interest from younger fans
True point about the lack of kids' interest, although Port and Crows kids are not flocking to watch the up and coming players in the SANFL. This is ultimately a policy question for the SANFL and clubs to work out how and where to position itself. It's probably it's most challenging task going forward.
The SANFL comp may dissolve, weaken, or even die in time. So be it, better to die on its feet than live in its knees.
You know, there could even be spot available for Carlton to join the SANFL if they continue their perpetual lapse into irrelevance.
Carlton no...Port Melbourne on the other hand...?? Seriously though, as good as this news is for the true SANFL fans, it raises the question of where does it leave the likes of Port Melbourne and the other one or two stand alone clubs currently in the VFL.
by UK Fan » Fri Mar 16, 2018 1:24 pm
Booney wrote:Hazydog wrote:
Carlton no...Port Melbourne on the other hand...?? Seriously though, as good as this news is for the true SANFL fans, it raises the question of where does it leave the likes of Port Melbourne and the other one or two stand alone clubs currently in the VFL.
Where does it leave the likes of Glenelg and West who could lose, immediately, $100k+ from their bottom line ( $50k from Adelaide and whatever they get from sponsors through the C7 deal ).
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by MW » Fri Mar 16, 2018 1:26 pm
by StrayDog » Fri Mar 16, 2018 1:28 pm
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:Something along the lines ofKahuna wrote:mighty_tiger_79 wrote:Anyone hear Ruccis dummy spit at Roy's open letter on wednesday arvo??
Is that the bit about "Centrals need to stop being part of the problem?".
'We know what the problems are Roy, we need solutions blah blah blah....and all i hear from Centrals is whinge, whinge, whinge
But Centrals to their credit (with South) voted against it....they can whinge as much as they like.
Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk
by therisingblues » Fri Mar 16, 2018 1:29 pm
Pseudo wrote:MW wrote:Pseudo wrote:MW wrote:I find it astounding that you want them out of the SANFL at any cost, yet want compensation for them playing in another league.
How about compensation for breaking the 15-year contract?
Not that I would expect the tossrags at the SANFL to pursue any compensation in the event that the garbage actually did exit the league before the contract was complete.
so let me see if I have this right...
1. You want them out of the SANFL at any cost
2. AFL are planning to get out of SANFL
3. You want compensation because they are breaking a 15 year contract
4. If they stay and honour the contract, revert back to step 1.
Personally, I want the garbage out of the league without condtion or qualification.
Nevertheless if the Clowns leave themselves in a legally questionable position then I say screw 'em for all they've got. Continuing to honour their agreement and pay each of the dinkum clubs $50K a year for the next decade might go some way to undoing the damage that their presence has wrought on the competition.
The Smears, OTOH, would seem to owe the SANFL nothing. Kick 'em out and be done with it.
by MW » Fri Mar 16, 2018 1:31 pm
by Wedgie » Fri Mar 16, 2018 1:31 pm
MW wrote:Caught up to what? That the AFL sides being in the SANFL is a big financial win for the SANFL clubs?
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |