Aerie wrote:Bancroft to bat 6. Keep Wade. Renshaw stays as opener.
Would rather 3 others before Wade.
Aerie wrote:Bancroft to bat 6. Keep Wade. Renshaw stays as opener.
Lightning McQueen wrote:Aerie wrote:Bancroft to bat 6. Keep Wade. Renshaw stays as opener.
Would rather 3 others before Wade.
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
PatowalongaPirate wrote:We are always going to pick an “all rounder” at 6 and it is not going to be another spinner.
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
The Bedge wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:Aerie wrote:Bancroft to bat 6. Keep Wade. Renshaw stays as opener.
Would rather 3 others before Wade.
Would rather play one short before Wade.

The Bedge wrote:PatowalongaPirate wrote:We are always going to pick an “all rounder” at 6 and it is not going to be another spinner.
More I think about, the more I think you're correct.
3x seamers and a spinner over 5 days is too thin, need a 4th seam option.
Lightning McQueen wrote:The Bedge wrote:PatowalongaPirate wrote:We are always going to pick an “all rounder” at 6 and it is not going to be another spinner.
More I think about, the more I think you're correct.
3x seamers and a spinner over 5 days is too thin, need a 4th seam option.
F*** the allrounder though, we can eek enough runs out of our bowlers.
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
The Bedge wrote:It's not about the runs, it's about taking 20 wickets and bowler work loads - if England have a good test and bat 2 consecutive days, you'd think Lyon will bowl the best part of 70 overs and Cummins, Hazlewood and Starc 30-35 each.
Australia will want someone who can bowl 5-10 overs an innings if need be, who is also capable of picking up a wicket.
The Bedge wrote:PatowalongaPirate wrote:We are always going to pick an “all rounder” at 6 and it is not going to be another spinner.
More I think about, the more I think you're correct.
3x seamers and a spinner over 5 days is too thin, need a 4th seam option.
Booney wrote:The Bedge wrote:PatowalongaPirate wrote:We are always going to pick an “all rounder” at 6 and it is not going to be another spinner.
More I think about, the more I think you're correct.
3x seamers and a spinner over 5 days is too thin, need a 4th seam option.
That's 5th bowler barely gets used though, they certainly don't bowl 15 or 18 overs an innings very often. If Lyon can't plug away at one end for 20 overs straight as the three quicks rotate through 4 or 5 over spells at the other end something is wrong with them all.
If desperate times call then Smith or Warner can throw an over or two down prior to a break to give Lyon a few overs off going into lunch or tea or give the three quicks the same respite.
Our fascination with the all-rounders position baffles me and I know I'm not alone.
Booney wrote:The Bedge wrote:PatowalongaPirate wrote:We are always going to pick an “all rounder” at 6 and it is not going to be another spinner.
More I think about, the more I think you're correct.
3x seamers and a spinner over 5 days is too thin, need a 4th seam option.
That's 5th bowler barely gets used though, they certainly don't bowl 15 or 18 overs an innings very often. If Lyon can't plug away at one end for 20 overs straight as the three quicks rotate through 4 or 5 over spells at the other end something is wrong with them all.
If desperate times call then Smith or Warner can throw an over or two down prior to a break to give Lyon a few overs off going into lunch or tea or give the three quicks the same respite.
Our fascination with the all-rounders position baffles me and I know I'm not alone.
daysofourlives wrote:heater31 wrote:daysofourlives wrote:I think the selectors will be salivating at Shaun Marsh making a 60 in the first shield game, cant really not pick him now. I think after 16 years in the system he is finally ready to reach his full potential.
you forgot one of these........
I like to keep people guessing
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
Brodlach wrote:Does Paine even keep for Tassie? Thought Wade did
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 125 guests