by Dutchy » Thu Sep 14, 2017 12:49 pm
by Off The Wall » Thu Sep 14, 2017 1:46 pm
Dutchy wrote:Onto this weekend of Prelim's, if results go the way of the favourite's in each grade we will have only 3 clubs represented across the 5 games on GF day.
by Dutchy » Thu Sep 14, 2017 2:01 pm
by Wilbur » Thu Sep 14, 2017 2:30 pm
Demon fan wrote:Interested in people's thoughts so who is at fault,
Porties who claimed to have ask if OK to play but clearly did the wrong thing on 5/08, SFL for not picking it up prior to game or MVale for asking the question?
by Swooper16 » Thu Sep 14, 2017 2:54 pm
Demon fan wrote:Interested in people's thoughts so who is at fault,
Porties who claimed to have ask if OK to play but clearly did the wrong thing on 5/08, SFL for not picking it up prior to game or MVale for asking the question?
by shoe boy » Thu Sep 14, 2017 5:13 pm
Dutchy wrote:Dunno, was impressed with the Shoe's 13's last week.
by Demon fan » Thu Sep 14, 2017 5:15 pm
Wilbur wrote:Demon fan wrote:Interested in people's thoughts so who is at fault,
Porties who claimed to have ask if OK to play but clearly did the wrong thing on 5/08, SFL for not picking it up prior to game or MVale for asking the question?
You're surely joking. Port Noarlunga 100% at fault.
by banterfordays » Fri Sep 15, 2017 9:17 am
King wrote:Front & Centre wrote:Anyone care to confirm if their club is not looking for a new coach next year? Numbers seem to be growing
Names of candidates being mentioned include Mitch Portlock, Justin Calderbank, Trent Mills, Marty Clifton, Ben Porter, Matt Golding with Mr Crate being asked to take the helm at CB. Care to confirm LGIL?
Don't know Mitty's plans for next year ........ bit premature with a GF on Saturday week, but if he needs an enticement to stay, l'll marry his daughter!!!!
by Oldman Munga » Fri Sep 15, 2017 10:18 pm
by norwood8 » Sat Sep 16, 2017 1:26 am
Oldman Munga wrote:Just heard Lonsdale have voted 40-5 in favour of leaving the SFL ,can someone from within confirm
by King » Sat Sep 16, 2017 9:17 pm
by shoe boy » Sat Sep 16, 2017 10:37 pm
King wrote:Two fairly ordinary games today in the SFL A & B grade prelims. Hope the standard, both footy ability and physically, rise for next week's GF's.
by King » Sun Sep 17, 2017 11:01 am
shoe boy wrote:King wrote:Two fairly ordinary games today in the SFL A & B grade prelims. Hope the standard, both footy ability and physically, rise for next week's GF's.
How many Prelims have you played and what grade ?
by shoe boy » Sun Sep 17, 2017 11:33 am
King wrote:shoe boy wrote:King wrote:Two fairly ordinary games today in the SFL A & B grade prelims. Hope the standard, both footy ability and physically, rise for next week's GF's.
How many Prelims have you played and what grade ?
SB, I could quote all kinds of amazing stats relating to my footy career and you would have no idea if they were true or not. However I will not do that simply as it is totally irrelevant to my original post. If you thought the two prelims were good games, so be it; I didn't.
by banterfordays » Sun Sep 17, 2017 5:23 pm
by Look Good In Leather » Sun Sep 17, 2017 10:04 pm
A-Grade was quite physical earlier in the game, Morphett Vale looked spent in the second halfKing wrote:Two fairly ordinary games today in the SFL A & B grade prelims. Hope the standard, both footy ability and physically, rise for next week's GF's.
by Front & Centre » Mon Sep 18, 2017 3:49 pm
by The Bedge » Mon Sep 18, 2017 3:50 pm
Front & Centre wrote:Interesting situation with the U16s girls competition Grand Final.
Christies Beach played unqualified players and Happy Valley had unqualified players on teamsheet without a number next to their name who did not play. League investigating and apparently want to call it a no result grand final.
Surely one of these offences where the girls actually played is worse than leaving a name on the teamsheet without a number next to their name which apparently was given the OK but SFL representative on the day.
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by Dutchy » Mon Sep 18, 2017 4:20 pm
Front & Centre wrote:Interesting situation with the U16s girls competition Grand Final.
Christies Beach played unqualified players and Happy Valley had unqualified players on teamsheet without a number next to their name who did not play. League investigating and apparently want to call it a no result grand final.
Surely one of these offences where the girls actually played is worse than leaving a name on the teamsheet without a number next to their name which apparently was given the OK but SFL representative on the day.
by Off The Wall » Mon Sep 18, 2017 4:40 pm
Dutchy wrote:Front & Centre wrote:Interesting situation with the U16s girls competition Grand Final.
Christies Beach played unqualified players and Happy Valley had unqualified players on teamsheet without a number next to their name who did not play. League investigating and apparently want to call it a no result grand final.
Surely one of these offences where the girls actually played is worse than leaving a name on the teamsheet without a number next to their name which apparently was given the OK but SFL representative on the day.
I heard the rule is if CB are found guilty, their score gets wiped like Porties did, however the issue is HV didn't score so makes it a 0-0 result!!!!
Surely it wouldn't take long for the SFL to oversee the team sheets say 24 hours before each final to confirm eligibility? would save a lot of these issues.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |