by Dogwatcher » Wed Aug 23, 2017 10:46 am
by morell » Wed Aug 23, 2017 10:48 am
Very reliable source has stated this is categorically untrue, so carry on!morell wrote:Little birdy told me that the rumour is - Round 5, May 6, "Tanti" played under Todd Lamont's name, against Salisbury West., a game which TOS won by 33 points and "Tanti" kicked 2 goals.
Lamont played off HBF all year but also hardly played until July this year. The clearance was lodged 1st May but approved 11th May - only leaves one game possible where clearance hadn't gone through yet...
Allegedly.
by Inallseriousness » Thu Aug 24, 2017 12:47 pm
by Footy Chick » Thu Aug 24, 2017 2:01 pm
Inallseriousness wrote:Rumour flying around that Salisbury West may be starting 2018 on negative points after the tribunal last night. Will make preseason a tough gig if true!?
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by Dolphin Treasure » Thu Aug 24, 2017 3:37 pm
Footy Chick wrote:Inallseriousness wrote:Rumour flying around that Salisbury West may be starting 2018 on negative points after the tribunal last night. Will make preseason a tough gig if true!?
Wouldn't be the first time.
And even last time it did happen, they still won a flag.
by Boosh » Thu Aug 24, 2017 5:33 pm
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Footy Chick wrote:Inallseriousness wrote:Rumour flying around that Salisbury West may be starting 2018 on negative points after the tribunal last night. Will make preseason a tough gig if true!?
Wouldn't be the first time.
And even last time it did happen, they still won a flag.
I know.... Shouldn't have stayed in Div 4
by Footy Chick » Thu Aug 24, 2017 7:48 pm
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by old farmer » Fri Aug 25, 2017 5:32 pm
Footy Chick wrote:Good Thumbs up from the Old Farmer tonight on the news. At least you got your 15 seconds of fame, unlike poor Giffo last week
by Footy Chick » Fri Aug 25, 2017 9:46 pm
Inallseriousness wrote:Rumour flying around that Salisbury West may be starting 2018 on negative points after the tribunal last night. Will make preseason a tough gig if true!?
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by Old Red » Fri Aug 25, 2017 10:24 pm
Footy Chick wrote:Inallseriousness wrote:Rumour flying around that Salisbury West may be starting 2018 on negative points after the tribunal last night. Will make preseason a tough gig if true!?
Turns out you were lukewarm on this one. This was just released:
Hi all. The League’s position towards on field behaviour is well documented.
Recently and following a review of tribunal records and as the season was drawing to an end, it was determined that 3 clubs were required to deposit a bond to remain eligible to compete in whatever division they were graded due to a disturbing level of tribunal activity.
This was deemed to be the most conciliatory course of action to offer some confidence to the league and opposition clubs that a player, players or club would not breach any ongoing sanction and avoid expulsion from the competition which is considered a last resort.
One of those clubs was the Salisbury West Football Club. Last Sunday a player from the SWFC Under 18Y team was reported for striking and subsequently suspended for 3 matches. The SWFC have been reported 5 times for a total of 35 matches this season.
The League offered the SWFC the opportunity to submit another deposit in lieu of the one forfeited so their U18 team may compete this Sunday in the U18Y Preliminary Final. The SWFC have voluntarily determined that they will not submit a bond and in turn forfeit the match allowing the Portland U18Y team rite of passage to the U18 Grand Final.
The League’s view on this is if any club that is required to submit a financial surety to generate some confidence that they might conduct themselves as expected and does not, validates the very concept of a bond and that is if the given club is not willing to risk a further loss of funds, why would the League risk it either.
The Salisbury West Football Club’s affiliation for season 2018 is subsequently under review.
by Inallseriousness » Fri Aug 25, 2017 10:43 pm
Footy Chick wrote:Inallseriousness wrote:Rumour flying around that Salisbury West may be starting 2018 on negative points after the tribunal last night. Will make preseason a tough gig if true!?
Turns out you were lukewarm on this one. This was just released:
Hi all. The League’s position towards on field behaviour is well documented.
Recently and following a review of tribunal records and as the season was drawing to an end, it was determined that 3 clubs were required to deposit a bond to remain eligible to compete in whatever division they were graded due to a disturbing level of tribunal activity.
This was deemed to be the most conciliatory course of action to offer some confidence to the league and opposition clubs that a player, players or club would not breach any ongoing sanction and avoid expulsion from the competition which is considered a last resort.
One of those clubs was the Salisbury West Football Club. Last Sunday a player from the SWFC Under 18Y team was reported for striking and subsequently suspended for 3 matches. The SWFC have been reported 5 times for a total of 35 matches this season.
The League offered the SWFC the opportunity to submit another deposit in lieu of the one forfeited so their U18 team may compete this Sunday in the U18Y Preliminary Final. The SWFC have voluntarily determined that they will not submit a bond and in turn forfeit the match allowing the Portland U18Y team rite of passage to the U18 Grand Final.
The League’s view on this is if any club that is required to submit a financial surety to generate some confidence that they might conduct themselves as expected and does not, validates the very concept of a bond and that is if the given club is not willing to risk a further loss of funds, why would the League risk it either.
The Salisbury West Football Club’s affiliation for season 2018 is subsequently under review.
by jo172 » Sat Aug 26, 2017 11:09 am
by Bullrider » Sat Aug 26, 2017 8:47 pm
jo172 wrote:How do you get to a stage where you don't have the confidence to keep one team in line for 8 quarters of footy?
by lovetotalkfooty » Sat Aug 26, 2017 11:01 pm
by Inallseriousness » Sat Aug 26, 2017 11:34 pm
lovetotalkfooty wrote:Congratulations to Ingle Farm today. Managed to be on the right end of the scoreline when the siren went. I will be very interested to see Ingle Farms thoughts on the game.
To the brahma lodge football club, today just wasnt our day. We won 5 of the 8 quarters we played this final series but find ourselves with no more football.
Based on today performance i am not sure Ingle Farm have the cattle to match elizabeth. Both relegated sides will go back to division 5.
Good luck to all involved and i look forward to what 2018 has to offer
by one day I will » Sun Aug 27, 2017 6:19 pm
by Robb_Stark » Sun Aug 27, 2017 6:39 pm
one day I will wrote:All credit goes to pulteney on Saturday. They have been the better team all year and deserve the first spot in the GF. We let ourselves down in the last quarter and it cost us the game. But it's funny how their supporters started abusing our players with centrelink remarks once they hit the front, just shows how up themselves they are. But I guess we will see what happens.
by heater31 » Sun Aug 27, 2017 6:58 pm
Let me guess Elizabeth supporters never trotted out the 'Private School Boy' routine.....one day I will wrote:All credit goes to pulteney on Saturday. They have been the better team all year and deserve the first spot in the GF. We let ourselves down in the last quarter and it cost us the game. But it's funny how their supporters started abusing our players with centrelink remarks once they hit the front, just shows how up themselves they are. But I guess we will see what happens.
by one day I will » Sun Aug 27, 2017 7:01 pm
Robb_Stark wrote:one day I will wrote:All credit goes to pulteney on Saturday. They have been the better team all year and deserve the first spot in the GF. We let ourselves down in the last quarter and it cost us the game. But it's funny how their supporters started abusing our players with centrelink remarks once they hit the front, just shows how up themselves they are. But I guess we will see what happens.
Elizabeth has very high unemployment
by The Bedge » Sun Aug 27, 2017 7:10 pm
one day I will wrote:Haha this is true. We cop that rubbish all the time, get some new material. 95% of players don't even live in Elizabeth. Whilst the other 5% may be unemployed
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |