by Bluedemon » Tue Jul 18, 2017 5:28 pm
by Senor Moto Gadili » Tue Jul 18, 2017 6:01 pm
by Robb_Stark » Tue Jul 18, 2017 7:41 pm
Senor Moto Gadili wrote:I'm not sure what you are looking for RS. He played Juniors in Hills League and got cleared to Glenunga this year. I assume he is a zero pointer because he only played juniors in Hills, no Senior games. Why would the Uraidla coach be picking a Glenunga player to play in his A grade team?
by Ian » Tue Jul 18, 2017 7:49 pm
Senor Moto Gadili wrote:I'm not sure what you are looking for RS. He played Juniors in Hills League and got cleared to Glenunga this year. I assume he is a zero pointer because he only played juniors in Hills, no Senior games. Why would the Uraidla coach be picking a Glenunga player to play in his A grade team?
by Senor Moto Gadili » Tue Jul 18, 2017 8:54 pm
Robb_Stark wrote:Senor Moto Gadili wrote:I'm not sure what you are looking for RS. He played Juniors in Hills League and got cleared to Glenunga this year. I assume he is a zero pointer because he only played juniors in Hills, no Senior games. Why would the Uraidla coach be picking a Glenunga player to play in his A grade team?
he is currently playing under 18s at uraidla and also playing A grade at Glenunga
by cracka » Tue Jul 18, 2017 9:19 pm
Senor Moto Gadili wrote:Robb_Stark wrote:Senor Moto Gadili wrote:I'm not sure what you are looking for RS. He played Juniors in Hills League and got cleared to Glenunga this year. I assume he is a zero pointer because he only played juniors in Hills, no Senior games. Why would the Uraidla coach be picking a Glenunga player to play in his A grade team?
he is currently playing under 18s at uraidla and also playing A grade at Glenunga
He played u18s for Uraidla on 1 Jul and played last two games for Glenunga A grade....so what. I'm sure it's all above board. If not the relevant authorities will sort out
by jo172 » Wed Jul 19, 2017 8:15 am
by Dutchy » Wed Jul 19, 2017 9:53 am
jo172 wrote:As part of the broader question, is there really much merit in allowing -1 point for under 18s in the Adelaide Footy League? I can't really see any overwhelming reasons in favour.
Secondly, if there is should the -1 only be allowed for juniors who have played enough games in the club's junior grade to be worth zero if coming from another club?
by jo172 » Wed Jul 19, 2017 9:57 am
Dutchy wrote:jo172 wrote:As part of the broader question, is there really much merit in allowing -1 point for under 18s in the Adelaide Footy League? I can't really see any overwhelming reasons in favour.
Secondly, if there is should the -1 only be allowed for juniors who have played enough games in the club's junior grade to be worth zero if coming from another club?
Serious? there is plenty of merit in allowing -1 for juniors to play senior footy.
by Robb_Stark » Wed Jul 19, 2017 10:19 am
by Dutchy » Wed Jul 19, 2017 10:49 am
jo172 wrote:Dutchy wrote:jo172 wrote:As part of the broader question, is there really much merit in allowing -1 point for under 18s in the Adelaide Footy League? I can't really see any overwhelming reasons in favour.
Secondly, if there is should the -1 only be allowed for juniors who have played enough games in the club's junior grade to be worth zero if coming from another club?
Serious? there is plenty of merit in allowing -1 for juniors to play senior footy.
Why?
Particularly in the Adelaide Footy League?
(as an unusual aside we've got a bloke who moved to town for Uni who's an Under 18, also playing seniors and is worth 3 points)
by The Bedge » Wed Jul 19, 2017 10:59 am
Dutchy wrote:Do I seriously have to spell it out for you?
I guess it spells out the disconnect between seniors and juniors in the city, despite playing for the same club....
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Jul 19, 2017 11:06 am
Zartan wrote:Dutchy wrote:Do I seriously have to spell it out for you?
I guess it spells out the disconnect between seniors and juniors in the city, despite playing for the same club....
I'd like it spelled out please. I don't see need for a junior being (-1), all it does is allow clubs to pick a couple of talented kids to free up room in the points for an extra recruit.
If you have a good relationship between juniors and seniors, and they're zero points, they'll still progress up into senior ranks, and if they're good enough they'll still get opportunity at a younger age.
by jo172 » Wed Jul 19, 2017 11:30 am
Dutchy wrote:jo172 wrote:Dutchy wrote:jo172 wrote:As part of the broader question, is there really much merit in allowing -1 point for under 18s in the Adelaide Footy League? I can't really see any overwhelming reasons in favour.
Secondly, if there is should the -1 only be allowed for juniors who have played enough games in the club's junior grade to be worth zero if coming from another club?
Serious? there is plenty of merit in allowing -1 for juniors to play senior footy.
Why?
Particularly in the Adelaide Footy League?
(as an unusual aside we've got a bloke who moved to town for Uni who's an Under 18, also playing seniors and is worth 3 points)
Do I seriously have to spell it out for you?
I guess it spells out the disconnect between seniors and juniors in the city, despite playing for the same club....
by jo172 » Wed Jul 19, 2017 11:31 am
Zartan wrote:Dutchy wrote:Do I seriously have to spell it out for you?
I guess it spells out the disconnect between seniors and juniors in the city, despite playing for the same club....
I'd like it spelled out please. I don't see need for a junior being (-1), all it does is allow clubs to pick a couple of talented kids to free up room in the points for an extra recruit.
If you have a good relationship between juniors and seniors, and they're zero points, they'll still progress up into senior ranks, and if they're good enough they'll still get opportunity at a younger age.
by jo172 » Wed Jul 19, 2017 11:42 am
Zartan wrote:Dutchy wrote:If you have a good relationship between juniors and seniors, and they're zero points, they'll still progress up into senior ranks, and if they're good enough they'll still get opportunity at a younger age.
by Robb_Stark » Wed Jul 19, 2017 1:07 pm
by scottroo » Wed Jul 19, 2017 1:31 pm
by cracka » Wed Jul 19, 2017 1:37 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:Zartan wrote:Dutchy wrote:Do I seriously have to spell it out for you?
I guess it spells out the disconnect between seniors and juniors in the city, despite playing for the same club....
I'd like it spelled out please. I don't see need for a junior being (-1), all it does is allow clubs to pick a couple of talented kids to free up room in the points for an extra recruit.
If you have a good relationship between juniors and seniors, and they're zero points, they'll still progress up into senior ranks, and if they're good enough they'll still get opportunity at a younger age.
I don't mind juniors being -1, I don't think it's right when they play for a different club though.
by Dolphin Treasure » Wed Jul 19, 2017 1:39 pm
scottroo wrote:25 games after the player turns 13yo
Example.
If a player turns 13 in December, any games played as a 12yo that year are included
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |