by The Bedge » Fri Jul 07, 2017 5:14 pm
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by jo172 » Fri Jul 07, 2017 5:16 pm
Zartan wrote:Is it true that Adel Uni / Colin Rowston reported Matt Stent after watching the SA Footballer footage of the match that went up on YouTube this morning?
Heard he's also been informed he cant play until he's had his tribunal hearing? Guilty until proven innocent?
Sounds pretty harsh to me, or am i in the minority?
by Trader » Fri Jul 07, 2017 5:18 pm
by Arch44 » Fri Jul 07, 2017 5:21 pm
by daysofourlives » Fri Jul 07, 2017 5:27 pm
Zartan wrote:Is it true that Adel Uni / Colin Rowston reported Matt Stent after watching the SA Footballer footage of the match that went up on YouTube this morning?
Heard he's also been informed he cant play until he's had his tribunal hearing? Guilty until proven innocent?
Sounds pretty harsh to me, or am i in the minority?
by The Bedge » Fri Jul 07, 2017 5:30 pm
Trader wrote:Haven't seen the footage, got a link?
I believe there is a bylaw that says you can't play until you attend the tribunal.
I guess what makes it a little unfair for Matty is that in this instance (assuming Zartan has is correct) is that he hasn't been given an opportunity to attend a tribunal between being reported and the next game.
I can only assume the footage is fairly damning and its obvious he'll get at least 1 game.
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by Footy Chick » Fri Jul 07, 2017 5:36 pm
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by jo172 » Fri Jul 07, 2017 5:37 pm
daysofourlives wrote:Zartan wrote:Is it true that Adel Uni / Colin Rowston reported Matt Stent after watching the SA Footballer footage of the match that went up on YouTube this morning?
Heard he's also been informed he cant play until he's had his tribunal hearing? Guilty until proven innocent?
Sounds pretty harsh to me, or am i in the minority?
Wouldnt there be a cut off time for reports to be made? At a guess probably on a Monday or Tuesday,
by jo172 » Fri Jul 07, 2017 5:38 pm
Zartan wrote:Trader wrote:Haven't seen the footage, got a link?
I believe there is a bylaw that says you can't play until you attend the tribunal.
I guess what makes it a little unfair for Matty is that in this instance (assuming Zartan has is correct) is that he hasn't been given an opportunity to attend a tribunal between being reported and the next game.
I can only assume the footage is fairly damning and its obvious he'll get at least 1 game.
The footage was apparently taken down after finding out that the report had been made.
It's pretty unfair on Matty and TTG to find out on a Friday afternoon that he can't play.
by Trader » Fri Jul 07, 2017 5:43 pm
by jo172 » Fri Jul 07, 2017 5:58 pm
by Eagles2014 » Fri Jul 07, 2017 6:19 pm
jo172 wrote:Fairly reliable source that Matt is playing tomorrow and will go through the usual league processes next week. Fair result
by daysofourlives » Fri Jul 07, 2017 10:22 pm
jo172 wrote:daysofourlives wrote:Zartan wrote:Is it true that Adel Uni / Colin Rowston reported Matt Stent after watching the SA Footballer footage of the match that went up on YouTube this morning?
Heard he's also been informed he cant play until he's had his tribunal hearing? Guilty until proven innocent?
Sounds pretty harsh to me, or am i in the minority?
Wouldnt there be a cut off time for reports to be made? At a guess probably on a Monday or Tuesday,
Presumably not if new evidence arises that can lead to a report/suspension by investigation?
by Trader » Sat Jul 08, 2017 12:44 am
by Senor Moto Gadili » Sat Jul 08, 2017 11:02 am
Q. wrote:What was the offence?
by Jimmy_041 » Sat Jul 08, 2017 1:48 pm
daysofourlives wrote:Zartan wrote:Is it true that Adel Uni / Colin Rowston reported Matt Stent after watching the SA Footballer footage of the match that went up on YouTube this morning?
Heard he's also been informed he cant play until he's had his tribunal hearing? Guilty until proven innocent?
Sounds pretty harsh to me, or am i in the minority?
Wouldnt there be a cut off time for reports to be made? At a guess probably on a Monday or Tuesday,
by daysofourlives » Sat Jul 08, 2017 3:19 pm
Jimmy_041 wrote:daysofourlives wrote:Zartan wrote:Is it true that Adel Uni / Colin Rowston reported Matt Stent after watching the SA Footballer footage of the match that went up on YouTube this morning?
Heard he's also been informed he cant play until he's had his tribunal hearing? Guilty until proven innocent?
Sounds pretty harsh to me, or am i in the minority?
Wouldnt there be a cut off time for reports to be made? At a guess probably on a Monday or Tuesday,
48.1 Any Member Club or person may lodge a complaint in writing to The League within seven (7) days in respect of any matter relating to any aspect of The League or any matches played in The League.
48.2 The League, the Executive Committee, the Tribunal or the Investigation Committee shall deal with such complaint.
48.3 Any complaint in respect of any matter relating to any aspect of The League or any matches played in The League lodged after seven (7) days shall only be considered at the discretion of The League.
by Senor Moto Gadili » Sat Jul 08, 2017 5:38 pm
by carey » Sat Jul 08, 2017 7:41 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |