by MW » Mon Jun 26, 2017 2:03 pm
by Dutchy » Mon Jun 26, 2017 2:07 pm
MW wrote:In a perfect world, do you want it back to how it used to be with AFL players spread out across all teams? or AFL players out of the league all together?
by Booney » Mon Jun 26, 2017 2:08 pm
Dutchy wrote:MW wrote:In a perfect world, do you want it back to how it used to be with AFL players spread out across all teams? or AFL players out of the league all together?
Either would be fine, having them completely out of the comp would allow the SANFL to grow though
by Hazydog » Mon Jun 26, 2017 2:15 pm
MW wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:Cool, I guess Adelaide supporters will be happy with other AFL clubs having a higher salary cap than them in the AFL.
Yep I would be, as long as the other clubs with higher salary caps play only the reserves, kids, and top up players
by Pseudo » Mon Jun 26, 2017 2:22 pm
MW wrote:therisingblues wrote:MW wrote:What cracka said.
If money decided who wins a football game, why aren't Crows and Port undefeated over the last few years?
Because the competition is now contrived.
There is also the "give a shit" factor. Something that we were all assured would not happen when the Crows were begging to be let in, now their coach buggers off whenever he feels like it to go watch the real Crows play. No matter what the state of the game of the actual team he is being paid to coach.
Come on MW, we have covered all of this ground a hundred times over, do you still need to be told by the likes of me, again?
You do realise there are two AFL sides in the SANFL?
So you're upset that they are not winning?
by another grub » Mon Jun 26, 2017 2:25 pm
nwdfanparade wrote:I would rather have a Norwood win with a comfortable margin than a win with a "nail biting" winning margin but would be happy with a win no matter what the margin.
by stan » Mon Jun 26, 2017 2:34 pm
another grub wrote:After the rigged preliminary final last year thd sanfl can go get f@#ed
by another grub » Mon Jun 26, 2017 2:42 pm
nwdfanparade wrote:I would rather have a Norwood win with a comfortable margin than a win with a "nail biting" winning margin but would be happy with a win no matter what the margin.
by hollywood7477 » Mon Jun 26, 2017 3:08 pm
another grub wrote:A packet. Had them going to win the flag too.
Never have i seen a side play like that in finals. It was clearly rigged
by cracka » Mon Jun 26, 2017 3:25 pm
therisingblues wrote:cracka wrote:johntheclaret wrote:MW wrote:I didn't realise money affected a players ability.
Damn it...I wish someone paid me to play and I would of been a decent player!
You come across like a clever bloke MW so I'll assume you are deliberately missing the point, but in case I'm wrong and you really aren't that smart, I'll spell it out for you.
Paying players more money doesn't make them better players.
Better players command a higher salary, just like in any other line of work.
Having a higher salary cap enables a club to attract the better players because it can pay more.
Two teams in a league where their salary cap is significantly higher than the other teams competing in the same league, have a significant advantage over those other teams.
So would you agree a team with a salary cap 100 times greater, (or whatever the exact ratio is), than another team in the same league has an advantage. Or more to the point, do you think it is fair?
If it was all the best players on Adelaides & Ports lists then yeah its totally unfair but thats not the case. Its mainly the 2nd tier & rookie listed players that play in the SANFL.
I don't have access to the actual figures myself Cracka, but I would hazard a guess that those second tier and rookie players are also on a truckload more cash than the rest of the competition.
Are you then claiming that it would only be unfair if the wealthiest players in Australia competed in the SANFL, but seeing as the reserves, while far exceeding the salary of the top paid part time footballer in the SANFL, are not the wealthiest, then it is okay?
I am sure the SANFL regulars, while they are toiling away at their boiler-making, tile-laying, teaching, marine research, or whatever it is they must do to pay their mortgage, put food on the table and send their kids to school, are thanking their lucky stars that it is only the 2nd tier full time footballers who are being trained in the state of the art facilities, tended to by the nation's best sports doctors and taught the game by Australia's highest paid coaches, that they must play against on weekends.
Yeah, sounds COMPLETELY fair to me. Glad that the Crows fans realise that it would be totally unfair for the TOP paid players on their list to be playing in the SANFL.
by Dutchy » Mon Jun 26, 2017 3:33 pm
Booney wrote:Dutchy wrote:MW wrote:In a perfect world, do you want it back to how it used to be with AFL players spread out across all teams? or AFL players out of the league all together?
Either would be fine, having them completely out of the comp would allow the SANFL to grow though
How do you propose it will grow then?
by Booney » Mon Jun 26, 2017 3:38 pm
Dutchy wrote:Booney wrote:Dutchy wrote:MW wrote:In a perfect world, do you want it back to how it used to be with AFL players spread out across all teams? or AFL players out of the league all together?
Either would be fine, having them completely out of the comp would allow the SANFL to grow though
How do you propose it will grow then?
Play to the competitions strengths, suburban, tribal, local, 2nd tier footy based around the next best from the AFL....simply make it the competition that players want to be part of once their AFL career finishes or stalls. And one that the grassroots footballer wants to be part of.
Imagine a comp that seriously attracted ex-AFL players and the best of the Ammo's/Country (there are thousands playing each weekend that are good enough), it would be a serious 2nd tier comp
by Ronnie » Mon Jun 26, 2017 3:54 pm
by Booney » Mon Jun 26, 2017 4:01 pm
Ronnie wrote:It will be interesting to see if there comes a time when struggling families, particularly in a state like SA, drop off in any meaningful number from the AFL, where they are helping to subsidize players who on average, will next year earn $370,000? The players in the AFL are so divorced from their own reality that some might have no choice if the disconnect gets any bigger. If that happens the SANFL and even some more prominent A1 clubs can hopefully get a bit more attention.
by Booney » Mon Jun 26, 2017 4:18 pm
Dutchy wrote:Booney wrote:Dutchy wrote:MW wrote:In a perfect world, do you want it back to how it used to be with AFL players spread out across all teams? or AFL players out of the league all together?
Either would be fine, having them completely out of the comp would allow the SANFL to grow though
How do you propose it will grow then?
Play to the competitions strengths, suburban, tribal, local, 2nd tier footy based around the next best from the AFL....simply make it the competition that players want to be part of once their AFL career finishes or stalls. And one that the grassroots footballer wants to be part of.
Imagine a comp that seriously attracted ex-AFL players and the best of the Ammo's/Country (there are thousands playing each weekend that are good enough), it would be a serious 2nd tier comp
by amber_fluid » Mon Jun 26, 2017 5:02 pm
Ronnie wrote:It will be interesting to see if there comes a time when struggling families, particularly in a state like SA, drop off in any meaningful number from the AFL, where they are helping to subsidize players who on average, will next year earn $370,000? The players in the AFL are so divorced from their own reality that some might have no choice if the disconnect gets any bigger. If that happens the SANFL and even some more prominent A1 clubs can hopefully get a bit more attention.
by Booney » Mon Jun 26, 2017 5:26 pm
amber_fluid wrote:Ronnie wrote:It will be interesting to see if there comes a time when struggling families, particularly in a state like SA, drop off in any meaningful number from the AFL, where they are helping to subsidize players who on average, will next year earn $370,000? The players in the AFL are so divorced from their own reality that some might have no choice if the disconnect gets any bigger. If that happens the SANFL and even some more prominent A1 clubs can hopefully get a bit more attention.
This is a very good post.
I went to my first SANFL game this year with my son on the weekend and it was so much more enjoyable and affordable than the AFL.
I had change from $100 which never happens at Adelaide Oval.
I'll be going back to Gliderol Stadium more often now as the little fella loved it as he could run around and I could have a few beers whilst watching him and the footy at the same time.
Better value for money I reckon even if the standard isn't as good.
I suspect as people tighten the purse strings that he SANFL becomes more attractive and better value.
by amber_fluid » Mon Jun 26, 2017 5:39 pm
Booney wrote:amber_fluid wrote:Ronnie wrote:It will be interesting to see if there comes a time when struggling families, particularly in a state like SA, drop off in any meaningful number from the AFL, where they are helping to subsidize players who on average, will next year earn $370,000? The players in the AFL are so divorced from their own reality that some might have no choice if the disconnect gets any bigger. If that happens the SANFL and even some more prominent A1 clubs can hopefully get a bit more attention.
This is a very good post.
I went to my first SANFL game this year with my son on the weekend and it was so much more enjoyable and affordable than the AFL.
I had change from $100 which never happens at Adelaide Oval.
I'll be going back to Gliderol Stadium more often now as the little fella loved it as he could run around and I could have a few beers whilst watching him and the footy at the same time.
Better value for money I reckon even if the standard isn't as good.
I suspect as people tighten the purse strings that he SANFL becomes more attractive and better value.
That depends on many factors.
If you're a non-drinker, like my Mum, who takes her own food to Adelaide Oval, it's not that expensive with a 11 game season ticket.
If you're like me, a drinker, then a walk around to Alberton with 7 or 8 beers, admission and a pasty is more costly that Mum's day at AO.
by another grub » Mon Jun 26, 2017 5:46 pm
nwdfanparade wrote:I would rather have a Norwood win with a comfortable margin than a win with a "nail biting" winning margin but would be happy with a win no matter what the margin.
by Ronnie » Mon Jun 26, 2017 5:51 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |