bennymacca wrote:The saltiness of port supporters is one of my favourite things
Saltiness? Beaten by the premiership favorite by 3 goals and we're 2-1. I'm alright thanks.
With GWS to come who smashed you last year then Carlton the week after. And you've been our(Carlton's) bitches the last few years so you could quickly be 2-3.
There are no stupid questions, just stupid people.
bennymacca wrote:The saltiness of port supporters is one of my favourite things
Saltiness? Beaten by the premiership favorite by 3 goals and we're 2-1. I'm alright thanks.
With GWS to come who smashed you last year then Carlton the week after. And you've been our(Carlton's) bitches the last few years so you could quickly be 2-3.
Fancy a wager? Assuming you'll be at the AO for the Carlton game.
bennymacca wrote:The saltiness of port supporters is one of my favourite things
Saltiness? Beaten by the premiership favorite by 3 goals and we're 2-1. I'm alright thanks.
With GWS to come who smashed you last year then Carlton the week after. And you've been our(Carlton's) bitches the last few years so you could quickly be 2-3.
Fancy a wager? Assuming you'll be at the AO for the Carlton game.
I don't gamble as it impedes my drinking funds. If the game was at the MCG I would but being at AO you may start slight favourites.
There are no stupid questions, just stupid people.
LaughingKookaburra wrote:Sorry I didn't word that correctly. Her partner looks like a well known Port fan.
IF it is the people I think it is then there will be no charges laid and taken completely out of the media and handed to a government department to handle.
Unfortunately I was 100% correct with my call on this. It's sad but the person(s) involved have integration difficulties.
Can you bring a man to his feet when defeat is on repeat?
LaughingKookaburra wrote:Sorry I didn't word that correctly. Her partner looks like a well known Port fan.
IF it is the people I think it is then there will be no charges laid and taken completely out of the media and handed to a government department to handle.
Unfortunately I was 100% correct with my call on this. It's sad but the person(s) involved have integration difficulties.
They were on the channel 7 news tonight being interviewed about their comments.
There are no stupid questions, just stupid people.
They should fear for their safety to be honest, neither of them would know how to handle being agressively approached and that will no doubt happen in coming days or weeks.
I am kind of shocked that 7 news put them in the lime light, really didn't do anyone any favours. They clearly don't understand what their words say and mean to others.
I'm not defending them by the way as I couldn't give a shit but all it takes is 1 person to "shoot first and ask questions later" with their fists then the both of them who would struggle to count to 10 could get the shit kicked out of them.
Can you bring a man to his feet when defeat is on repeat?
Yeah this is a bit unseemly Channel 7 should be ashamed of themselves this is akin to Sam Newman and his old street talk stuff. The guy clearly isn't playing with a full deck and she's just too feral to expect better of. Channel 7 should not be exploiting people like this for a cheap story whatever happened to ethical reporting standards in the media.
"The factory of the future will have only two employees, a man and a dog. The man will be there to feed the dog. The dog will be there to keep the man from touching the equipment" – Warren Bennis
