by dogbreath » Thu Dec 01, 2016 9:10 pm
by Eagles2014 » Thu Dec 01, 2016 9:16 pm
dogbreath wrote:Not that I give a rats toss bag about Central missing out.
But doesn't it seem a tad suspicious that the clubs that had their womens team application rejected were the two clubs (Central & South) that voted against the AFL reserves teams entering the SANFL.
Surely the Northern & Southern suburbs are two huge potential growth areas for a fledgling womens comp.
Payback ?????
by whufc » Thu Dec 01, 2016 9:18 pm
by heater31 » Thu Dec 01, 2016 9:53 pm
whufc wrote:Somethings gone on especially considering Centrals already had an established side
by Wedgie » Thu Dec 01, 2016 10:38 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by dogbreath » Thu Dec 01, 2016 10:40 pm
by Wedgie » Thu Dec 01, 2016 10:43 pm
dogbreath wrote:Let's hear what those reasons are then. Why hasn't the SANFL disclosed them ?
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Magellan » Fri Dec 02, 2016 2:30 am
by mots02 » Fri Dec 02, 2016 8:13 am
dogbreath wrote:Let's hear what those reasons are then. Why hasn't the SANFL disclosed them ?
by MW » Fri Dec 02, 2016 8:18 am
by vics01 » Fri Dec 02, 2016 8:25 am
by stan » Fri Dec 02, 2016 9:48 am
by MatteeG » Fri Dec 02, 2016 10:01 am
stan wrote:This whole thing still makes no sense to me. There is already a WFL in SA at the moment, the SANFL should be integrating with that rather than starting another one from scratch.
helicopterking wrote:Flaggies will choke. Always have.
by Booney » Fri Dec 02, 2016 10:10 am
dogbreath wrote:Not that I give a rats toss bag about Central missing out.
by Magellan » Fri Dec 02, 2016 10:28 am
MatteeG wrote:stan wrote:This whole thing still makes no sense to me. There is already a WFL in SA at the moment, the SANFL should be integrating with that rather than starting another one from scratch.
Spot on. And how the frick can we possibly afford a side when we have more pressing issues currently (like actual survival).
by southee » Fri Dec 02, 2016 12:39 pm
by Reddeer » Fri Dec 02, 2016 1:34 pm
southee wrote:Considering the massive amount of youth unemployment in the North and South you would think the SANFL brains trust would have teams in the regions. (Running a great female youth program for participation)
I'm all for the conspiracy theory - we (and the doggies) got shafted big time.
by darley16 » Fri Dec 02, 2016 2:23 pm
by Broken Down Hack » Fri Dec 02, 2016 8:04 pm
Magellan wrote:MatteeG wrote:stan wrote:This whole thing still makes no sense to me. There is already a WFL in SA at the moment, the SANFL should be integrating with that rather than starting another one from scratch.
Spot on. And how the frick can we possibly afford a side when we have more pressing issues currently (like actual survival).
Like others, I doubt there's a conspiracy re: South and Centrals. However, I think MatteeG makes a good point, given the Bays current precarious finances.
Apologies for what might be the bleedin' obvious, but what's this project expected to cost each club all up? I understand the Essayeneffell are putting 10K in for each club, and I assume it costs more than that to run this comp, so does that means the balance is paid out by the individual clubs, or is the AFL coming in to apply more funds?
As MatteeG says, surely the Bays have better things to do with their money than fund this experiment, like staying alive. I can only presume that the Bays wouldn't have put their hand up if it would put them further in the red, and thus there would have to be some financial assistance offered by someone to bankroll their participation and justify their nomination.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |