by jo172 » Thu Oct 06, 2016 9:03 am
by Ian » Thu Oct 06, 2016 10:11 am
vics01 wrote:I wonder about the legality of the stat dec. before the courts? Let alone the overload in the courts what the time frame would be to get something so insignificant as local footy before a court.. Where will the money come from for the CFL to put a matter before the Court? If they win all good and well if they lose the cost will be massive.. Integrity officer really??
27—False declaration
(1) Any person who wilfully makes any declaration by virtue of this Part, knowing that declaration to be untrue in any material particular, shall be guilty of an offence, and shall be liable, upon conviction thereof, to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding four years.
(2) In any proceedings under this Part in relation to an offence referred to in subsection (1) of this section where the court is satisfied that the defendant knew that he was required to declare his belief in the truth of the declaration referred to in that subsection it shall not be a defence that the declaration was not duly made or that the declaration was not in the form prescribed by section 25 of this Act.
by Dutchy » Thu Oct 06, 2016 11:30 am
shoe boy wrote:.
The CFL is committed to Regulation 31 as is evident by the significant investigation network that has been established which now includes a part time resource purely focused on player payments.
Well well well , so now we have another snout in the trough .
by Bag & Sledge » Thu Oct 06, 2016 12:28 pm
jo172 wrote:Who I am is unimportant.
The basic answer to the only foolproof method to getting around the Salary Cap is complete and utter discretion. Everyone aware of it (player and official) needs to keep their mouth completely zipped.
The reality is that local football officials and gun local footballers are notoriously indiscreet, and are far more typically chest beaters.
For what it's worth the main amendment I would make to the salary cap is dramatically reducing the amount of paperwork required for compliance.
Having to report that you gave $20 to the BOG in the D Grade any given week is a bit much in my view.
by morell » Thu Oct 06, 2016 2:34 pm
Hahhah please. The vast majority of professionally run sporting institutions around the world have salary caps in one form or another.Bag & Sledge wrote:Currently Country Football is the only sport (that I'm aware of) where you are crucified for having your club in order and being successful.
by shoe boy » Thu Oct 06, 2016 3:13 pm
morell wrote:Hahhah please. The vast majority of professionally run sporting institutions around the world have salary caps in one form or another.Bag & Sledge wrote:Currently Country Football is the only sport (that I'm aware of) where you are crucified for having your club in order and being successful.
That's because they understand the mixture of greedy but average sportsmen, instant success oriented coaches/administrators and a free market often results in a rapid deterioration of the sport.
by morell » Thu Oct 06, 2016 3:30 pm
by Jimmy_041 » Thu Oct 06, 2016 3:32 pm
by Bag & Sledge » Thu Oct 06, 2016 5:36 pm
morell wrote:The EPL have a form of a salary cap. Clubs in excess of 50 odd million pounds are limited to smaller increases than others.
IPL has a salary cap ($10m)
The UFC is as much of a professionally run sport as WWE. And I've loved the UFC since I used to hire them on VHS from the Movieland on Cross Road to watch Royce Gracie strangle ****.
But nah, the AFL, NBA, NHL, NFL ... they don't know what they're doing. Old mates Bag & Sledge and shoe boy from safooty.net know better
by morell » Thu Oct 06, 2016 11:06 pm
by BigB » Sat Oct 08, 2016 8:18 am
Ian wrote:vics01 wrote:I wonder about the legality of the stat dec. before the courts? Let alone the overload in the courts what the time frame would be to get something so insignificant as local footy before a court.. Where will the money come from for the CFL to put a matter before the Court? If they win all good and well if they lose the cost will be massive.. Integrity officer really??
Extract from the South Australian Oaths Act - 193327—False declaration
(1) Any person who wilfully makes any declaration by virtue of this Part, knowing that declaration to be untrue in any material particular, shall be guilty of an offence, and shall be liable, upon conviction thereof, to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding four years.
(2) In any proceedings under this Part in relation to an offence referred to in subsection (1) of this section where the court is satisfied that the defendant knew that he was required to declare his belief in the truth of the declaration referred to in that subsection it shall not be a defence that the declaration was not duly made or that the declaration was not in the form prescribed by section 25 of this Act.
by Ditchy » Sun Oct 09, 2016 11:43 pm
by LaughingKookaburra » Sun Oct 09, 2016 11:52 pm
by Ditchy » Mon Oct 10, 2016 12:35 am
LaughingKookaburra wrote:Why would you ban clubs for that? Bit over the top.
by LaughingKookaburra » Mon Oct 10, 2016 6:09 am
by morell » Mon Oct 10, 2016 10:02 am
No one had ever been convicted of cyber crime in 1976 either.LaughingKookaburra wrote:Name 1 Australian club that has ever been kicked out of any competition for that? Way over the top.
by shoe boy » Wed Oct 12, 2016 8:00 am
by human_torpedo » Wed Oct 12, 2016 8:41 am
by Mr Beefy » Wed Oct 12, 2016 9:08 am
shoe boy wrote:Todays Tiser "Matt Turner" Probe into salary cap breaches.
Quote from Matt Duldig "We THINK it has worked really well"
You have to be joking ,this witch hunt is a disgrace to all grass roots football clubs .
Matt and his now army of volunteers who continue to tell all we are saving ourselves from ourselves !!
Matt go back and TRY another way to prop up a very poor product in the SANFL!
by jo172 » Wed Oct 12, 2016 9:13 am
human_torpedo wrote:Whether its being kicked out or not, that's open for debate. But I certainly think the first penalty handed down to a clear and heavy breach of the TPPS will set an important precedent..
The hard part being a monetary fine wont really hamper the sort of clubs who will heavily rort the system as they are more than likely financially strong so a sponsor will just chi[p in and pay the fine and they move on.. It has to hit the club where it hurts them. It will be interesting to see what they hand down to the first club they find in breach that's for sure
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |