CH9AFL Division 6 2016

Adelaide Footy League Talk
Locked

Who will win the D6 Grand Final?

Adelaide Lutheran
1
1%
Brahma Lodge
10
11%
Fitzroy
4
4%
Ingle Farm
9
10%
Houghton Districts
11
12%
Mawson Lakes
4
4%
Mitchell Park
4
4%
Trinity OS
6
7%
West Croydon
29
32%
Woodville South
13
14%
 
Total votes: 91

The Bedge
Coach
Posts: 17875
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2015 11:58 am
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Location: BarbeeCueAria
Has thanked: 3336 times
Been thanked: 4470 times
Contact:

Re: CH9AFL Division 6 2016

Post by The Bedge »

Robb_Stark wrote:Woodville South will be pissed they got rolled by brahma on the weekend i dont think any team would want to bump into woods the following week :)

You just worry about planning for D7 next year buddy :twisted:
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
User avatar
Q.
Coach
Posts: 22019
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:46 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Collingwood
Team: Houghton Districts
Location: El Dorado
Has thanked: 970 times
Been thanked: 2397 times
Contact:

Re: CH9AFL Division 6 2016

Post by Q. »

Zartan wrote:
Robb_Stark wrote:Woodville South will be pissed they got rolled by brahma on the weekend i dont think any team would want to bump into woods the following week :)

You just worry about planning for D7 next year buddy :twisted:


You just worry about planning for D6 next year pal :P
User avatar
morell
Coach
Posts: 6466
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 9:26 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Team: Mitchell Park
Has thanked: 2032 times
Been thanked: 1182 times
Contact:

Re: CH9AFL Division 6 2016

Post by morell »

Houghton would be pretty short priced favourites to stay up, shirley.
human_torpedo
League Bench Warmer
Posts: 1210
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 12:17 pm
Team: Eagles
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 371 times
Contact:

Re: CH9AFL Division 6 2016

Post by human_torpedo »

morell wrote:Houghton would be pretty short priced favourites to stay up, shirley.

Running into a fairly in form side in the Roys.. I think the Roys will win, and with a point differential hovering around 25 goals between HD and MP % wise I think HD are up against it.. But home ground advantage gives them a sniff no doubt
User avatar
morell
Coach
Posts: 6466
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 9:26 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Team: Mitchell Park
Has thanked: 2032 times
Been thanked: 1182 times
Contact:

Re: CH9AFL Division 6 2016

Post by morell »

The Mountain Men are made of stern stuff and fear is one of humanities greatest motivators. Reckon they'll get the chocolates.
human_torpedo
League Bench Warmer
Posts: 1210
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 12:17 pm
Team: Eagles
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 371 times
Contact:

Re: CH9AFL Division 6 2016

Post by human_torpedo »

All I want from Saturday is for there to be a chocolate donut left in the Houghton canteen when I arrive..
The Bedge
Coach
Posts: 17875
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2015 11:58 am
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Location: BarbeeCueAria
Has thanked: 3336 times
Been thanked: 4470 times
Contact:

Re: CH9AFL Division 6 2016

Post by The Bedge »

Just my observation from Saturday.. they had some handy sorts in their side, but the depth was severely lacking. Keetch, McMurtrie and Vandermoer seemed to be doing a large amount of the work, Schutz was good as usual - but not as good as I've seen him (to be expected returning from injury though).

Schneider was alright but Roling and Dolan were useless. ;)

Too few contributors and a lot of blokes who looked out of their depth in A grade.. Obviously better suited to their ground, but 'Roys oval is around the same size and I think they'll have too much zip around the ground for the bulky Raiders.
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
User avatar
morell
Coach
Posts: 6466
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 9:26 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Team: Mitchell Park
Has thanked: 2032 times
Been thanked: 1182 times
Contact:

Re: CH9AFL Division 6 2016

Post by morell »

Would you buttholes stop giving them extra motivation FFS.
The Bedge
Coach
Posts: 17875
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2015 11:58 am
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Location: BarbeeCueAria
Has thanked: 3336 times
Been thanked: 4470 times
Contact:

Re: CH9AFL Division 6 2016

Post by The Bedge »

Ian Henderson surely sniffing for an A grade call up this week though? Bloke carved up our B grade Saturday, must've had about 30 kicks, a few contested marks, a couple clearances and played in just about every position on the ground except the ruck!

Get him in there!
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
BZB27
League - Best 21
Posts: 2028
Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 5:27 pm
Team: North Adelaide
Team: St Kilda
Team: Salisbury
Has thanked: 216 times
Been thanked: 173 times
Contact:

Re: CH9AFL Division 6 2016

Post by BZB27 »

Zartan wrote:Just my observation from Saturday.. they had some handy sorts in their side, but the depth was severely lacking. Keetch, McMurtrie and Vandermoer seemed to be doing a large amount of the work, Schutz was good as usual - but not as good as I've seen him (to be expected returning from injury though).

Schneider was alright but Roling and Dolan and Bray were useless. ;)

Too few contributors and a lot of blokes who looked out of their depth in A grade.. Obviously better suited to their ground, but 'Roys oval is around the same size and I think they'll have too much zip around the ground for the bulky Raiders.


I had a stinker on the weekend.
the milky bar kid
League - Best 21
Posts: 1701
Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 1:20 pm
Team: Houghton Districts
Location: underneath the Bedge's wing
Has thanked: 119 times
Been thanked: 241 times
Contact:

Re: CH9AFL Division 6 2016

Post by the milky bar kid »

BZB27 wrote:
Zartan wrote:Just my observation from Saturday.. they had some handy sorts in their side, but the depth was severely lacking. Keetch, McMurtrie and Vandermoer seemed to be doing a large amount of the work, Schutz was good as usual - but not as good as I've seen him (to be expected returning from injury though).

Schneider was alright but Roling and Dolan and Bray were useless. ;)

Too few contributors and a lot of blokes who looked out of their depth in A grade.. Obviously better suited to their ground, but 'Roys oval is around the same size and I think they'll have too much zip around the ground for the bulky Raiders.


I had a stinker on the weekend.


Far from the worst, as I said Saturday, blame the midfield! ;)
Computer Crashed
Reserves
Posts: 824
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2015 6:04 pm
Team: Eagles
Team: North Melbourne
Team: Moonta
Has thanked: 213 times
Been thanked: 124 times
Contact:

Re: CH9AFL Division 6 2016

Post by Computer Crashed »

Zartan wrote:Just my observation from Saturday.. they had some handy sorts in their side, but the depth was severely lacking. Keetch, McMurtrie and Vandermoer seemed to be doing a large amount of the work, Schutz was good as usual - but not as good as I've seen him (to be expected returning from injury though).

Schneider was alright but Roling and Dolan were useless. ;)

Too few contributors and a lot of blokes who looked out of their depth in A grade.. Obviously better suited to their ground, but 'Roys oval is around the same size and I think they'll have too much zip around the ground for the bulky Raiders.

Vanders for the medal I reckon.
User avatar
old farmer
League Bench Warmer
Posts: 1247
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2008 10:47 pm
Team: Central District
Team: Hawthorn
Team: Ingle Farm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 112 times
Contact:

Re: CH9AFL Division 6 2016

Post by old farmer »

Computer Crashed wrote:
Zartan wrote:Just my observation from Saturday.. they had some handy sorts in their side, but the depth was severely lacking. Keetch, McMurtrie and Vandermoer seemed to be doing a large amount of the work, Schutz was good as usual - but not as good as I've seen him (to be expected returning from injury though).

Schneider was alright but Roling and Dolan were useless. ;)

Too few contributors and a lot of blokes who looked out of their depth in A grade.. Obviously better suited to their ground, but 'Roys oval is around the same size and I think they'll have too much zip around the ground for the bulky Raiders.

Vanders for the medal I reckon.


Gee you Pooraka boys stick together. Robb Stark runner up too CC. ;)
What about the young lad at IF that kicked 7 on the weekend. Rate him at all CC. 8)
Success is not final; failure is not fatal: It is the courage to continue that counts....
Arch44
League - Top 5
Posts: 2998
Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2014 3:47 pm
Team: Central District
Team: Hawthorn
Has thanked: 730 times
Been thanked: 285 times
Contact:

Re: CH9AFL Division 6 2016

Post by Arch44 »

human_torpedo wrote:All I want from Saturday is for there to be a chocolate donut left in the Houghton canteen when I arrive..

Unlikely with me there
Hogg Shield Div IV 2018 Winner
Computer Crashed
Reserves
Posts: 824
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2015 6:04 pm
Team: Eagles
Team: North Melbourne
Team: Moonta
Has thanked: 213 times
Been thanked: 124 times
Contact:

Re: CH9AFL Division 6 2016

Post by Computer Crashed »

old farmer wrote:
Computer Crashed wrote:
Zartan wrote:Just my observation from Saturday.. they had some handy sorts in their side, but the depth was severely lacking. Keetch, McMurtrie and Vandermoer seemed to be doing a large amount of the work, Schutz was good as usual - but not as good as I've seen him (to be expected returning from injury though).

Schneider was alright but Roling and Dolan were useless. ;)

Too few contributors and a lot of blokes who looked out of their depth in A grade.. Obviously better suited to their ground, but 'Roys oval is around the same size and I think they'll have too much zip around the ground for the bulky Raiders.

Vanders for the medal I reckon.


Gee you Pooraka boys stick together. Robb Stark runner up too CC. ;)
What about the young lad at IF that kicked 7 on the weekend. Rate him at all CC. 8)

Not yet.
adr107
Under 16s
Posts: 285
Joined: Sun May 18, 2014 8:09 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Team: Houghton Districts
Has thanked: 305 times
Been thanked: 83 times
Contact:

Re: CH9AFL Division 6 2016

Post by adr107 »

Arch44 wrote:
human_torpedo wrote:All I want from Saturday is for there to be a chocolate donut left in the Houghton canteen when I arrive..

Unlikely with me there


PLUG - Don't worry gentleman, the beautiful people from Lovells Bakery Inglewood will be stocking the place for the day. What a set up.
User avatar
Q.
Coach
Posts: 22019
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:46 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Collingwood
Team: Houghton Districts
Location: El Dorado
Has thanked: 970 times
Been thanked: 2397 times
Contact:

Re: CH9AFL Division 6 2016

Post by Q. »

Computer Crashed wrote:Vanders for the medal I reckon.


Would be nice, But could be a bit tough polling big with only six wins for the year.
The Bedge
Coach
Posts: 17875
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2015 11:58 am
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Location: BarbeeCueAria
Has thanked: 3336 times
Been thanked: 4470 times
Contact:

Re: CH9AFL Division 6 2016

Post by The Bedge »

Q. wrote:
Computer Crashed wrote:Vanders for the medal I reckon.


Would be nice, But could be a bit tough polling big with only six wins for the year.

Not out of the question though. Bit like Grant Hawksworth one season at Ingle Farm - side got flogged each week by 150+ and didn't win a game, and he finished top 3 or so in the count.. picked up a lot of 2nd and 3rd preference votes.

Strong sides like WS & WC have good depth, you'd think they would have a good spread of vote getters, which may affect individual medal chances - where as someone like Vanders will be a stand out in a losing side, and likely very dominant in a winning side - every chance he could poll 20 votes and win the medal..
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
Computer Crashed
Reserves
Posts: 824
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2015 6:04 pm
Team: Eagles
Team: North Melbourne
Team: Moonta
Has thanked: 213 times
Been thanked: 124 times
Contact:

Re: CH9AFL Division 6 2016

Post by Computer Crashed »

Zartan wrote:
Q. wrote:
Computer Crashed wrote:Vanders for the medal I reckon.


Would be nice, But could be a bit tough polling big with only six wins for the year.

Not out of the question though. Bit like Grant Hawksworth one season at Ingle Farm - side got flogged each week by 150+ and didn't win a game, and he finished top 3 or so in the count.. picked up a lot of 2nd and 3rd preference votes.

Strong sides like WS & WC have good depth, you'd think they would have a good spread of vote getters, which may affect individual medal chances - where as someone like Vanders will be a stand out in a losing side, and likely very dominant in a winning side - every chance he could poll 20 votes and win the medal..

My thoughts were exactly that, lots of seconds and thirds, chuck in a couple of firsts and whacko.
Was surprised by his physic actually when I saw him, he's dropped a fair bit of weight I reckon even though he wasn't overly heavy beforehand.
Covers the ground a lot better.
Could be the bumble bee jumper.
Good luck to him.
Junior CC actually acquired his Christian name from him.
Bit of irony they ended up playing against each other.
Robb_Stark
League - Best 21
Posts: 1810
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2013 10:31 am
Team: Eagles
Team: Adelaide Crows
Has thanked: 72 times
Been thanked: 155 times
Contact:

Re: CH9AFL Division 6 2016

Post by Robb_Stark »

smart money would be on a forward line player from brahma lodge but i forget his name think has kicked a lot of goals this year :)
Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 47 guests