by Down the Hill » Wed Aug 03, 2016 10:20 am
by Look Good In Leather » Wed Aug 03, 2016 10:30 am
Dogwatcher wrote:Brighton?
by Dols » Wed Aug 03, 2016 11:00 am
the SAAFL should not get that call. There should not be different rules for different divisions.Down the Hill wrote:Win the GF and you will get promoted!!!
Div 4 GF teams since 2013 reads like this.
2013 - Plympton 1st promoted to Div 3, Brahma Lodge 2nd and elected to be dropped to A5 and went winless.
2014 - GG 1st promoted to Div 3, Salisbury West 2nd and elected to be dropped to A7 and won 5 games
2015 - Kilburn 1st promoted to Div 3, Salisbury 2nd and elected to stay in Div 4 and still a chance to challenge for a flag.
The runners up have made their own call for the past 3 years so the only difference this year is that the SAAFL has made the call for them.
by Jimmy_041 » Wed Aug 03, 2016 11:09 am
Dols wrote:the SAAFL should not get that call. There should not be different rules for different divisions.Down the Hill wrote:Win the GF and you will get promoted!!!
Div 4 GF teams since 2013 reads like this.
2013 - Plympton 1st promoted to Div 3, Brahma Lodge 2nd and elected to be dropped to A5 and went winless.
2014 - GG 1st promoted to Div 3, Salisbury West 2nd and elected to be dropped to A7 and won 5 games
2015 - Kilburn 1st promoted to Div 3, Salisbury 2nd and elected to stay in Div 4 and still a chance to challenge for a flag.
The runners up have made their own call for the past 3 years so the only difference this year is that the SAAFL has made the call for them.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
by Dols » Wed Aug 03, 2016 11:10 am
it only has a derogatory effect on 10% of the clubsJimmy_041 wrote:Dols wrote:the SAAFL should not get that call. There should not be different rules for different divisions.Down the Hill wrote:Win the GF and you will get promoted!!!
Div 4 GF teams since 2013 reads like this.
2013 - Plympton 1st promoted to Div 3, Brahma Lodge 2nd and elected to be dropped to A5 and went winless.
2014 - GG 1st promoted to Div 3, Salisbury West 2nd and elected to be dropped to A7 and won 5 games
2015 - Kilburn 1st promoted to Div 3, Salisbury 2nd and elected to stay in Div 4 and still a chance to challenge for a flag.
The runners up have made their own call for the past 3 years so the only difference this year is that the SAAFL has made the call for them.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Actually the SAAFL clubs made the call. 90% of the clubs voted yes
by Dutchy » Wed Aug 03, 2016 11:13 am
by heater31 » Wed Aug 03, 2016 11:18 am
Dutchy wrote:Is Brighton & MVPFC joining just the start?
by Look Good In Leather » Wed Aug 03, 2016 11:45 am
heater31 wrote:Dutchy wrote:Is Brighton & MVPFC joining just the start?
Are Hackham working on their issues that got them denied?
Potentially 4 clubs leaving inside 2 seasons is not a good look for a League.
by zedman » Wed Aug 03, 2016 12:10 pm
Jimmy_041 wrote:Dols wrote:the SAAFL should not get that call. There should not be different rules for different divisions.Down the Hill wrote:Win the GF and you will get promoted!!!
Div 4 GF teams since 2013 reads like this.
2013 - Plympton 1st promoted to Div 3, Brahma Lodge 2nd and elected to be dropped to A5 and went winless.
2014 - GG 1st promoted to Div 3, Salisbury West 2nd and elected to be dropped to A7 and won 5 games
2015 - Kilburn 1st promoted to Div 3, Salisbury 2nd and elected to stay in Div 4 and still a chance to challenge for a flag.
The runners up have made their own call for the past 3 years so the only difference this year is that the SAAFL has made the call for them.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Actually the SAAFL clubs made the call. 90% of the clubs voted yes
by Dols » Wed Aug 03, 2016 12:12 pm
a mathematician, how exciting.zedman wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:Dols wrote:the SAAFL should not get that call. There should not be different rules for different divisions.Down the Hill wrote:Win the GF and you will get promoted!!!
Div 4 GF teams since 2013 reads like this.
2013 - Plympton 1st promoted to Div 3, Brahma Lodge 2nd and elected to be dropped to A5 and went winless.
2014 - GG 1st promoted to Div 3, Salisbury West 2nd and elected to be dropped to A7 and won 5 games
2015 - Kilburn 1st promoted to Div 3, Salisbury 2nd and elected to stay in Div 4 and still a chance to challenge for a flag.
The runners up have made their own call for the past 3 years so the only difference this year is that the SAAFL has made the call for them.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Actually the SAAFL clubs made the call. 90% of the clubs voted yes
thats because 90% of the clubs arent affected by it this year..do the maths..
by human_torpedo » Wed Aug 03, 2016 12:21 pm
by Jimmy_041 » Wed Aug 03, 2016 12:25 pm
Dols wrote:Down the Hill wrote:Win the GF and you will get promoted!!!
Div 4 GF teams since 2013 reads like this.
2013 - Plympton 1st promoted to Div 3, Brahma Lodge 2nd and elected to be dropped to A5 and went winless.
2014 - GG 1st promoted to Div 3, Salisbury West 2nd and elected to be dropped to A7 and won 5 games
2015 - Kilburn 1st promoted to Div 3, Salisbury 2nd and elected to stay in Div 4 and still a chance to challenge for a flag.
The runners up have made their own call for the past 3 years so the only difference this year is that the SAAFL has made the call for them.
the SAAFL should not get that call. There should not be different rules for different divisions.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
by The Hound » Wed Aug 03, 2016 1:52 pm
heater31 wrote:Footy Chick wrote:
What are Brighton anyway? Are they the Bombers?
Of the yellow and black variety.....can all visiting sides please visit a tanning salon prior to your visit
by old farmer » Wed Aug 03, 2016 2:41 pm
human_torpedo wrote:4 clubs affected. 65 clubs at a quick count. 6.15% of clubs potentially could be affected for the growth of the league.
I feel for those 4 affected clubs. But sometimes in life to establish growth some short term pain will be felt. I'm sure those affected clubs would have been setting themselves for a premiership anyway, unfortunately this year their wont be a consolation prize..
by old farmer » Wed Aug 03, 2016 2:45 pm
by human_torpedo » Wed Aug 03, 2016 2:52 pm
old farmer wrote:human_torpedo wrote:4 clubs affected. 65 clubs at a quick count. 6.15% of clubs potentially could be affected for the growth of the league.
I feel for those 4 affected clubs. But sometimes in life to establish growth some short term pain will be felt. I'm sure those affected clubs would have been setting themselves for a premiership anyway, unfortunately this year their wont be a consolation prize..
4 divisions and 5 teams in each finals series. That's a few more than 4 affected. And i know for a fact that there was not 20 hands up at the meeting. Yours definitely wouldn't have been up, not going to affect Trinity at all........
Anyway, a vote is a vote and was definitely a majority rule. Now lets sit back and enjoy the excitement Morphies and Brighton will bring to our comp.....
by Executive Member » Wed Aug 03, 2016 2:54 pm
human_torpedo wrote:old farmer wrote:human_torpedo wrote:4 clubs affected. 65 clubs at a quick count. 6.15% of clubs potentially could be affected for the growth of the league.
I feel for those 4 affected clubs. But sometimes in life to establish growth some short term pain will be felt. I'm sure those affected clubs would have been setting themselves for a premiership anyway, unfortunately this year their wont be a consolation prize..
4 divisions and 5 teams in each finals series. That's a few more than 4 affected. And i know for a fact that there was not 20 hands up at the meeting. Yours definitely wouldn't have been up, not going to affect Trinity at all........
Anyway, a vote is a vote and was definitely a majority rule. Now lets sit back and enjoy the excitement Morphies and Brighton will bring to our comp.....
It only affects the losing grand finalist of div 4, 5, 6 and 7? How does it affect all 5 finalists in 4 divisions.. Unless you make the GF you don't go up. If you win it, you still go up. Hence, the only affected clubs are the 4 losing Grand Finalists.. That's all I was saying. If Ingle Farm make and lose the GF this year, my heart will bleed for you Old Farmer
by old farmer » Wed Aug 03, 2016 3:03 pm
human_torpedo wrote:old farmer wrote:human_torpedo wrote:4 clubs affected. 65 clubs at a quick count. 6.15% of clubs potentially could be affected for the growth of the league.
I feel for those 4 affected clubs. But sometimes in life to establish growth some short term pain will be felt. I'm sure those affected clubs would have been setting themselves for a premiership anyway, unfortunately this year their wont be a consolation prize..
4 divisions and 5 teams in each finals series. That's a few more than 4 affected. And i know for a fact that there was not 20 hands up at the meeting. Yours definitely wouldn't have been up, not going to affect Trinity at all........
Anyway, a vote is a vote and was definitely a majority rule. Now lets sit back and enjoy the excitement Morphies and Brighton will bring to our comp.....
It only affects the losing grand finalist of div 4, 5, 6 and 7? How does it affect all 5 finalists in 4 divisions.. Unless you make the GF you don't go up. If you win it, you still go up. Hence, the only affected clubs are the 4 losing Grand Finalists.. That's all I was saying. If Ingle Farm make and lose the GF this year, my heart will bleed for you Old Farmer
by Footy Chick » Wed Aug 03, 2016 3:05 pm
old farmer wrote:i know what i mean because i run a football club, not coach B Grade
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by zedman » Wed Aug 03, 2016 3:16 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |