Dutchy wrote:Ports first night game for 2 months tonight
I hope the trains are on time tonight.
by PatowalongaPirate » Fri Jul 01, 2016 4:36 pm
Dutchy wrote:Ports first night game for 2 months tonight
by JK » Fri Jul 01, 2016 4:41 pm
Booney wrote:Zartan wrote:Booney wrote:I don't think we'll give up anything that would be considered worth a first round pick, unless we got a big offer for a key player.
So, second round pick - Jonas, Ah Chee
Third round - O'Shea, Clurey. Colquhoun
So you don't think Hartlett will come under fire end of year?
Also with some of those players, other clubs might also view them as being far more valuable than what Port do - might get some decent deals out of it..
No, I personally think all the talk about Hartlett is bullshit. He's been average this year, sometimes average at best, but he's a keeper. Plus nobody would be prepared to take his contract on, not the money, but the length.
by Sheik Yerbouti » Fri Jul 01, 2016 4:48 pm
by hawks21 » Fri Jul 01, 2016 4:53 pm
JK wrote:Booney wrote:Zartan wrote:Booney wrote:I don't think we'll give up anything that would be considered worth a first round pick, unless we got a big offer for a key player.
So, second round pick - Jonas, Ah Chee
Third round - O'Shea, Clurey. Colquhoun
So you don't think Hartlett will come under fire end of year?
Also with some of those players, other clubs might also view them as being far more valuable than what Port do - might get some decent deals out of it..
No, I personally think all the talk about Hartlett is bullshit. He's been average this year, sometimes average at best, but he's a keeper. Plus nobody would be prepared to take his contract on, not the money, but the length.
Wouldn't that suggest you're happy with average?
He's much more capable than he's shown, but surely you'd at least test the waters to if there's an interest and what it could potentially bring in?
by Booney » Fri Jul 01, 2016 4:58 pm
JK wrote:Wouldn't that suggest you're happy with average?
He's much more capable than he's shown, but surely you'd at least test the waters to if there's an interest and what it could potentially bring in?
by marbles » Fri Jul 01, 2016 5:45 pm
Sheik Yerbouti wrote:I think if Westoff, Pittard or Young rolled up to training in their present state of football day grooming in 1965 Fos would have the barber in quick smart.
Donald Dickie would just be bashed.
by Jim05 » Fri Jul 01, 2016 6:10 pm
by carey » Fri Jul 01, 2016 7:17 pm
Jim05 wrote:Hombsch out with a quad injury tonight now
by Brodlach » Fri Jul 01, 2016 7:29 pm
carey wrote:Jim05 wrote:Hombsch out with a quad injury tonight now
Hope Clurey comes in not Paul Stewart. If Stewart comes in on Jack= Game over. Tigers win
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by Ruben Carter » Fri Jul 01, 2016 8:18 pm
Booney wrote:Ruben Carter wrote:GWW wrote:Westhoff is 30 in October this year, he doesnt have much value.
Just a number. Brent Harvey is nearly 40 and only a midget, Westie still has plenty of value IMO. Keep him!
Yeah, but Brent Harvey plays 5 minutes of football every 3 weeks now so.....
Westhoff has ZERO trade value.
by JK » Fri Jul 01, 2016 8:34 pm
Booney wrote:JK wrote:Wouldn't that suggest you're happy with average?
He's much more capable than he's shown, but surely you'd at least test the waters to if there's an interest and what it could potentially bring in?
Not one bit am I happy with average. However, if you can mount a case for someone to replace him who will offer us more at this point in time I'm all ears. Needless to say, that's the problem with the depth in our list.
by carey » Sat Jul 02, 2016 12:35 am
carey wrote:MW wrote:Mitchell in normally spells disaster, Richmond a certainty this week
Whilst in theory I agree I think we still win.
Saying that I think we win big or lose nothing in between if you get what I mean. Hoff due for his monthly good game, Hartlett simply must perform, Broadbent won't have to worry about anyone so he'll play well. Ollie simply must show last years form, I reckon Gray and Chad might get a handful each, Ebert should only be allowed to Handball wish he could like he can run.
Boak and Charlie still dealt with harshly for mine.
Surely it's a case of shutting down Jack and Dusty and it's game over?? Let Cotchin have his 35 Kane Cornes touches they don't hurt anyone.
by UK Fan » Sat Jul 02, 2016 8:49 am
Former Glory wrote:carey wrote:Zartan wrote:carey wrote:Where is UK's crowd predication for tonight?
I'll do it for him.
Crowd predication tonight? I cant see it being more than sub 30,000.
I was thinking 35ish
Will get over 40k i reckon. Richmond draw ok crowds here, port should win, Friday night and the weather not bad.
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by MW » Sat Jul 02, 2016 10:30 am
carey wrote:carey wrote:MW wrote:Mitchell in normally spells disaster, Richmond a certainty this week
Whilst in theory I agree I think we still win.
Saying that I think we win big or lose nothing in between if you get what I mean. Hoff due for his monthly good game, Hartlett simply must perform, Broadbent won't have to worry about anyone so he'll play well. Ollie simply must show last years form, I reckon Gray and Chad might get a handful each, Ebert should only be allowed to Handball wish he could like he can run.
Boak and Charlie still dealt with harshly for mine.
Surely it's a case of shutting down Jack and Dusty and it's game over?? Let Cotchin have his 35 Kane Cornes touches they don't hurt anyone.
I will happily wipe the egg off my face. Mitchell was super tonight, Ran with Cotch and toweled him up even helped himself to about 25 touches himself but his pressure was awesome. Ports tackling as a whole was awesome (conditions helped) but to win the tackles by nearly 50 and win the game by 6 goals is a good sign.
Boak was awesome, Ollie and Gray were good in fact most blokes except O'Shea were..
Really tough month coming up I guess the only thing we can hang our hat on is the fact over the last few years we match up well against the good sides it's the sides we should beat that we don't!
by amber_fluid » Sat Jul 02, 2016 5:14 pm
carey wrote:carey wrote:MW wrote:Mitchell in normally spells disaster, Richmond a certainty this week
Whilst in theory I agree I think we still win.
Saying that I think we win big or lose nothing in between if you get what I mean. Hoff due for his monthly good game, Hartlett simply must perform, Broadbent won't have to worry about anyone so he'll play well. Ollie simply must show last years form, I reckon Gray and Chad might get a handful each, Ebert should only be allowed to Handball wish he could like he can run.
Boak and Charlie still dealt with harshly for mine.
Surely it's a case of shutting down Jack and Dusty and it's game over?? Let Cotchin have his 35 Kane Cornes touches they don't hurt anyone.
I will happily wipe the egg off my face. Mitchell was super tonight, Ran with Cotch and toweled him up even helped himself to about 25 touches himself but his pressure was awesome. Ports tackling as a whole was awesome (conditions helped) but to win the tackles by nearly 50 and win the game by 6 goals is a good sign.
Boak was awesome, Ollie and Gray were good in fact most blokes except O'Shea were..
Really tough month coming up I guess the only thing we can hang our hat on is the fact over the last few years we match up well against the good sides it's the sides we should beat that we don't!
by amber_fluid » Sat Jul 02, 2016 5:26 pm
marbles wrote:Sheik Yerbouti wrote:I think if Westoff, Pittard or Young rolled up to training in their present state of football day grooming in 1965 Fos would have the barber in quick smart.
Donald Dickie would just be bashed.
exactly Shiek vote #1 for Fos
read this article...
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/afl/teams/port-adelaide/port-adelaides-kelly-gang-giving-the-team-a-scarier-look-says-coach-ken-hinkley/news-story/bf1ffbacf272e258bd99543996ea28fa
“If we start losing I think we’ll get rid of them.’’
why! why would that statement even be said?...... cos its vanity #idiotsspuds.jpg
by Booney » Sat Jul 02, 2016 7:51 pm
JK wrote:Booney wrote:JK wrote:Wouldn't that suggest you're happy with average?
He's much more capable than he's shown, but surely you'd at least test the waters to if there's an interest and what it could potentially bring in?
Not one bit am I happy with average. However, if you can mount a case for someone to replace him who will offer us more at this point in time I'm all ears. Needless to say, that's the problem with the depth in our list.
I can't mate, was talking about potentially shopping him (or moreso finding out what clubs would give up for him)
by Booney » Mon Jul 04, 2016 9:54 am
by stan » Mon Jul 04, 2016 10:57 am
by LaughingKookaburra » Mon Jul 04, 2016 11:04 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |